PDA

View Full Version : Who do you think would make a worse president Hillary or Rudy?




Danny Molina
10-18-2007, 02:11 PM
I personally think it would be Rudy. He'd take away all of our liberties. It would be like having Putin as president.

steph3n
10-18-2007, 02:11 PM
both are evil.

Danny Molina
10-18-2007, 02:12 PM
The point is to pick the lesser of two evils.

Adamsa
10-18-2007, 02:13 PM
Definately Rudy, he is actually a dumbass. Hillary has a brain, but she is still a conformist domestic santa claus, but at least she isn't blowing everyone up.

Original_Intent
10-18-2007, 02:15 PM
So which is scarier,a CFR puppet with a brain or King George III?

theseus51
10-18-2007, 02:15 PM
Wow, do I want rapid socialism or authoritarian tyranny? That's tough.

JosephTheLibertarian
10-18-2007, 02:17 PM
I rather have Hillary than a new Benito Mussolini

fletcher
10-18-2007, 02:17 PM
Hillary would definitely be worse seeing the Democrats will be in control of Congress. Say hello to socialized medicine, and goodbye to control of your money.

AMack
10-18-2007, 02:18 PM
Hillary: Prolonged war, no civil liberties, no free market, socialized healthcare
Rudy: Prolonged war, no civil liberties, no free market, no socialized healthcare

Rudy barely scrapes by for me, but when I look at the two of them, I don't see much difference. Its like comparing two cars, totally identical except for the fact that one has a couple more cup holders.

r3volution
10-18-2007, 02:18 PM
i vote 3rd party or i dont vote .

Trassin
10-18-2007, 02:19 PM
I would probably be voting for the libertarian candidate if those were the two choices.

r3volution
10-18-2007, 02:20 PM
i wrote Ron Paul on my monitor and clicked on that :p

JosephTheLibertarian
10-18-2007, 02:20 PM
I won't be voting if these are my choices

JimDude
10-18-2007, 02:28 PM
Hillary would be much worse. Because of national health care, plus her war over seas, it would bankrupt us faster than we could ever imagine.

But if those are the choices, Ill vote for Ron Paul anyway.

AMack
10-18-2007, 02:28 PM
I won't be voting for either of these knuckleheads either, but in the hypothetical situation that I had no choice...

JMann
10-18-2007, 02:29 PM
Facist or Communist. That is a difficult one.

r3volution
10-18-2007, 02:38 PM
The point is to pick the lesser of two evils.

actually , thats not what the title says .. you asked who is worse .

quickmike
10-18-2007, 02:55 PM
This poll is unfair.

Its the same thing as the South Park choice between the douche and turd sandwich. Is there really any difference?

Danny Molina
10-18-2007, 02:56 PM
actually , thats not what the title says .. you asked who is worse .

Good Point. I was wrong. It's to pick the Evilest of two evils.

Minlawc
10-18-2007, 02:57 PM
Remember to read the thread title first before voting.
I voted for Rudy, he seems far more decietful then Clinton.

LibertyEagle
10-18-2007, 03:04 PM
Who do you think would make a worse president Hillary or Rudy?

There's a difference?

skiingff
10-18-2007, 03:06 PM
Well, let's see... Do we want World War III (Rudy), or a fake socialist bitch who is simply a continuation of the Clinton presidency?

Between those two choices, I'll take another 8 years of Clinton, please.

RonPaulFever
10-18-2007, 03:06 PM
They're equally undesirable.

Van Damme
10-18-2007, 03:08 PM
There's a difference?

Not much of one.

Brock Landers
10-18-2007, 03:12 PM
It was hard but I said Rudy. I'm assuming the dems will control congress, so I'm hoping Rudy would veto some of the universal healthcare crap. Also I think Hillary will be more authoritarian than some people are giving her credit for.

But really, it hard to tell. GW Bush had a lot of HORRIBLE qualities/views/positions which did not become apparent until after he was elected. I think Rudy and Hillary will both be similar in that respect....which one has more evil in their bag of tricks?


ooops....and I just realized I voted for Rudy to be the worst, when my thought process was that he would be the lesser of two evils. Oh well. I hope I don't make a similar mistake on super primary day....:(

Natalie
10-18-2007, 03:14 PM
Rudy is scarier. He even looks evil. I shudder when he smiles.

I wouldn't vote for either.

kylejack
10-18-2007, 03:14 PM
Either one would bring huge entitlement programs. Either one is likely to invade Iran and God knows where else. Rudy has the added bonus of possibly imposing a police state, moreso than we have already. I voted Rudy.

mavtek
10-18-2007, 03:18 PM
I didn't see assassinate so I'm writing it in.

blamx8
10-18-2007, 03:19 PM
Lets see, would I rather put my eyes out with a burning stick, or with battery acid?

lbrtylvr
10-18-2007, 03:19 PM
Hillary would definitely be worse seeing the Democrats will be in control of Congress. Say hello to socialized medicine, and goodbye to control of your money.

+1, gridlock FTW

steph3n
10-18-2007, 03:23 PM
I can't vote for either, I REFUSE to vote for either.

Original_Intent
10-18-2007, 03:32 PM
I can't vote for either, I REFUSE to vote for either.

I second that. I would never vote for either, third party if those are my choices.

Rudy would be the preferable choice for one reason - he will be so heavy handed with his authoritarianism that it would be more likely to cause an uprising, I think Hillary would be more likely to weasle things in and keep the public asleep until it is too late.

steph3n
10-18-2007, 03:33 PM
I will not join any healthcare plan nor pay taxes to fund it if it comes to that either :D

dircha
10-18-2007, 03:39 PM
At least with Hillary we will start to draw down troops immediately even if we have a lesser number of "peacekeeping" troops in there for another couple years.

And at least with Hillary there is hope that we will instead enter into a sanctions regime against Iran and delay the march to war. With Rudy there will be no delay, and no hope.

There is also no chance that Rudy will sign any bill restoring any of the liberties we've lost in the last 6 years. With Hillary there is a good chance.

Hillary is the lesser of two evils by a long shot.

If you think higher taxes are more of a threat than escalation and expansion of the war in the middle east and further surrendering of our civil liberties at home, you are nuts. Neither is good, but the former is clearly worse.

If Rudy Giuliani gets the Republican nomination, I will actively support Ron Paul as a third party candidate to ensure Rudy can't get enough votes, or barring that, will grit my teeth and actively campaign for Hillary to prevent Rudy from winning.


Having Rudy Giuliani as president would be as bad as having Dick Cheney as president.

JMann
10-18-2007, 03:41 PM
Though I like the direction on social issues that Rudy would lead the Rep party. I could never vote for a former prosecutor.

jointhefightforfreedom
10-18-2007, 03:46 PM
So what was the question Stalin or Hitler?

Lyn
10-18-2007, 03:52 PM
Just thinking about the choice gives me nausea and a huge splitting headache. You just gave me more reason to continue this battle to the White House. Hurry everyone!! More signs, more donations, more canvassing NOW!!

michaelwise
10-18-2007, 04:00 PM
How about a vote on, whose voice do you like better. Lispy Ruddy or Screechy Hillary?