PDA

View Full Version : RUBIO 50% stinkface 25% meek 19%




sarahgop
10-08-2010, 02:27 PM
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/florida/election_2010_florida_senate

great news

Kotin
10-08-2010, 02:29 PM
:rolleyes:


You are hopeless.

sarahgop
10-08-2010, 02:52 PM
i am very hopeful about nov 02

HOLLYWOOD
10-08-2010, 03:13 PM
HaHa your choice candidates for US Senator from Florida... the 3 Stooges: Poison, Polution, and Noise

wormyguy
10-08-2010, 03:36 PM
Slightly less awful candidate beating awful candidate 2 and awful candidate 3?

Slutter McGee
10-08-2010, 03:47 PM
I have some hope for Rubio. Not because I trust the guy. But because he is gonna owe a lot of favors to Demint.

Sincerley,

Slutter McGee

JohnEngland
10-08-2010, 04:08 PM
Whilst Rubio isn't in my top 3 senate races, I do like that he's a good family man and defends traditional values. His win would certainly be a good thing.

YouTube - Stand with Marco at MarcoRubio.com (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Yc-qRFpAM4)

sarahgop
10-08-2010, 06:41 PM
it would be a great thing.

RedStripe
10-08-2010, 06:46 PM
Yea a lot of things are gonna change for the better when these tea party folks get elected, with all their awesome family values. It's change I can believe in.

I just can't wait To Take Are Country Back(tm)

Mini-Me
10-08-2010, 06:55 PM
Yea a lot of things are gonna change for the better when these tea party folks get elected, with all their awesome family values. It's change I can believe in.

I just can't wait To Take Are Country Back(tm)

For a second, I thought you wrote, "To Take Are Country Back Ah Reckin." ;)

Seriously though, "family values" is the age-old self-righteous tripe we've been hearing from establishment Republican social conservatives for ages...not liberty-lovers. I mean, I'm cool with liberty-lovers who are social conservatives on the cultural side of things, but that doesn't mean I agree with it, and it's sure as hell not a substitute for actual substantive pro-liberty views in a politician.

BTW, sarahgop, how's Scott Brown doing? :rolleyes:

BamaFanNKy
10-08-2010, 07:14 PM
I was in Florida and I grabbed a bumper sticker. Was looking for a button.

He seems like a good dude but, a bit more like Huckabee.

TheTyke
10-08-2010, 07:25 PM
No use for Rubio. He's an Aspen Institute chap like Grayson and Conway in KY. Not everyone trumped as a "tea party candidate" is constitutional.... though we're very fortunate to have some real ones in the mix.

qh4dotcom
10-08-2010, 08:42 PM
Alex Snitker, the Florida Libertarian candidate, says Rubio won't sign a 10th amendment pledge, won't debate him

LibertyMage
10-08-2010, 08:46 PM
No use for Rubio. He's an Aspen Institute chap like Grayson and Conway in KY.

Winner!

TonyFromTheBronx
10-08-2010, 09:08 PM
there is something too slick about this dude...reminds me of newt gingrich

i wouldnt trust him

libertarian4321
10-09-2010, 03:03 AM
Whilst Rubio isn't in my top 3 senate races, I do like that he's a good family man and defends traditional values. His win would certainly be a good thing.



Every Republican is a "good family man who defends family values," right up until the day the photos come out showing him with a hooker, diddling a campaign staffer, or snorting coke off the nude body of his gay lover.

The primary Republican value seems to be hypocrisy.

JohnEngland
10-09-2010, 03:39 AM
Yea a lot of things are gonna change for the better when these tea party folks get elected, with all their awesome family values. It's change I can believe in.

Naturally, things will only change with liberty candidates, like Rand. However, it's also important that the people you elect are decent people. Decent people are less likely to lie and steal from you.

This is one of the great appeals of Ron Paul. Not only is he right on the issues, with regards to money, spending, taxes, war, the Constitution and so on, but he is also a good family man with traditional values. He's been faithfully married to his wife for, what, 50 or so years? He's lead an honest and clean life and defends human life. This all adds to his appeal.

This was the downfall of Mark Sanford. Seemed great on the issues. Real fiscal hawk. But betraying one's wife like that tells you a lot about the person... Same goes for Gingrich. If he could lie to his wives, why wouldn't he lie to the electorate?

Now, Rubio is far from perfect, but I'll wait until he's (presumably) in the senate and voting on legislation before I assume that he'll be like many of the others. But out of the three in this Florida race, he certainly appears to be the best option.

JohnEngland
10-09-2010, 03:40 AM
Every Republican is a "good family man who defends family values," right up until the day the photos come out showing him with a hooker, diddling a campaign staffer, or snorting coke off the nude body of his gay lover.

The primary Republican value seems to be hypocrisy.

Not so with Ron Paul!

Mini-Me
10-09-2010, 05:44 AM
Naturally, things will only change with liberty candidates, like Rand. However, it's also important that the people you elect are decent people. Decent people are less likely to lie and steal from you.

This is one of the great appeals of Ron Paul. Not only is he right on the issues, with regards to money, spending, taxes, war, the Constitution and so on, but he is also a good family man with traditional values. He's been faithfully married to his wife for, what, 50 or so years? He's lead an honest and clean life and defends human life. This all adds to his appeal.

This was the downfall of Mark Sanford. Seemed great on the issues. Real fiscal hawk. But betraying one's wife like that tells you a lot about the person... Same goes for Gingrich. If he could lie to his wives, why wouldn't he lie to the electorate?

Now, Rubio is far from perfect, but I'll wait until he's (presumably) in the senate and voting on legislation before I assume that he'll be like many of the others. But out of the three in this Florida race, he certainly appears to be the best option.

I don't get this talk of Rubio as a "decent person." Hypothetically, who is a more decent person to you:
A Wiccan man who has outrageously deviant sex with five other men every day but opposes war (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=262768) and the military-industrial complex?
Or a Church-going family man who has been faithfully married to his wife since he graduated high school, who has ten kids and loves them very much, but who supports war (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=262768) and the military industrial complex?

"Family values" are no substitute for true human decency, and I consider people getting their body parts blown off at their wedding to be far more obscene than anything a full-blown porn star has ever done.

sarahgop
10-09-2010, 05:48 AM
i love mr rubio.

Mini-Me
10-09-2010, 05:49 AM
i love mr rubio.

You loved Scott Brown, too. Forgive me for not giving much weight to your recommendation.

sarahgop
10-09-2010, 05:52 AM
I don't get this talk of Rubio as a "decent person." Hypothetically, who is a more decent person to you:
A Wiccan man who has outrageously deviant sex with five other men every day but opposes war (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=262768) and the military-industrial complex?
Or a Church-going family man who has been faithfully married to his wife since he graduated high school, who has ten kids and loves them very much, but who supports war (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=262768) and the military industrial complex?

"Family values" are no substitute for true human decency, and I consider people getting their body parts blown off at their wedding to be far more obscene than anything a full-blown porn star has ever done.

your political purity makes you meaningless in changing anything.:confused:

sarahgop
10-09-2010, 05:53 AM
You loved Scott Brown, too. Forgive me for not giving much weight to your recommendation.

he is the best we could do in commie MA. scotty is great.

RedStripe
10-09-2010, 06:08 AM
lol @ sarahgop

Either a clever troll gimmick or a perfect example of what's wrong with Amurica.

JacksonianBME
10-09-2010, 06:29 AM
lol @ sarahgop
perfect example of what's wrong with Amurica.

This

Mini-Me
10-09-2010, 06:30 AM
your political purity makes you meaningless in changing anything.:confused:

...really? What exactly is this typical Republican Rubio going to change, that is of any significance...?

Foreign policy is the single most important issue. It's an enormous part of the federal budget, and it involves killing innocent people with no accountability and begging for blowback, all so the military-industrial complex can make the big bucks. How is making that issue a dealbreaker, "political purity?" Opposing SENSELESS WARMONGERS is "political purity?"

If you really believe that, I could call you a "political purist" for opposing any politician over practically any other issue. Oppose pro-Obamacare politicians? Political purist! Oppose pro-cap and trade politicians? Political purist!


he is the best we could do in commie MA. scotty is great.

So basically, you're saying that an establishment neocon, who does not care about war, the police state, corporate fascism (i.e. the road to national socialism) or even the budget (so long as Republicans are the ones spending) is somehow any better than the establishment Democrats he ran against? ...and you're going further and calling him GREAT?

Let me guess: You're not actually a Ron Paul supporter, are you? I mean, you seem perfectly fine with the Republican establishment, so how could you be?

sarahgop
10-09-2010, 06:45 AM
ron paul is great in his district but ron paul wouldnt win in MA. i support the best person that can win. your political purity tests render you totally meaningless.

Mini-Me
10-09-2010, 06:50 AM
ron paul is great in his district but ron paul wouldnt win in MA. i support the best person that can win. your political purity tests render you totally meaningless.

Maybe you're right, but being totally meaningless is a whole lot better than actively contributing to the problem, like you do when you support guys like Brown and Rubio. When you call them the "best," you're missing the point: They're just as bad as their opponents.

RedStripe
10-09-2010, 06:51 AM
ron paul is great in his district but ron paul wouldnt win in MA. i support the best person that can win. your political purity tests render you totally meaningless.

10 years from now, no matter how many "best person that can win" are elected, we're still going to be headed in the same direction.


But if being a partisan cheerleader is what you like to do, go for it.

sarahgop
10-09-2010, 06:56 AM
10 years from now, no matter how many "best person that can win" are elected, we're still going to be headed in the same direction.


But if being a partisan cheerleader is what you like to do, go for it.

and 10 years from now what will you have accomplished poilitically?

RedStripe
10-09-2010, 06:57 AM
and 10 years from now what will you have accomplished poilitically?

I will be President of the United States of America.

Agorism
10-09-2010, 07:06 AM
Rubio will hurt Paul in the florida primary as he is jeb's man.

sarahgop
10-09-2010, 08:43 AM
Rubio will hurt Paul in the florida primary as he is jeb's man.

as long as he isnt reids man, as crist and meeks are.

wormyguy
10-09-2010, 09:26 AM
I will actually use this opportunity to defend Scott Brown. No, he's not perfect. In fact, he's pretty darned awful. But he is still far better than Martha Coakley. Sometimes, when you have a national frickin' emergency, like the Democrats having a 60-vote supermajority with which to ram through a truly insane socialist agenda, you have to hold your nose and pull the lever for the least worst option that actually has a shot at winning.

erowe1
10-09-2010, 09:31 AM
as long as he isnt reids man, as crist and meeks are.

Is that really all it takes for you to support a politician, that they help the Republicans grow government rather than helping the Dems do it?

Agorism
10-09-2010, 09:31 AM
There is a good libertarian candidate running in Florida.

Agorism
10-09-2010, 09:41 AM
Scott Brown is fine in that one election, but he needs a primary challenger.

Kotin
10-09-2010, 11:34 AM
and 10 years from now what will you have accomplished poilitically?

lolololololol....

Aratus
10-09-2010, 11:44 AM
Scott Brown is fine in that one election, but he needs a primary challenger.


me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me! me!

RonPaulFanInGA
10-09-2010, 12:30 PM
There is a good libertarian candidate running in Florida.

Who is going to finish in a distant fourth place (at best), with a very low single-digit vote percentage when the votes are actually counted on November 2nd. We all know that's where that candidacy is ending up.

I get what 'sarahgop' is saying. I still don't like Rubio, but if I lived in Florida I'd probably vote for him to ensure no Crist or Meek. I'm thankful I don't need to make that choice though.