PDA

View Full Version : Republicans took 100 seats in 1894!




libertybrewcity
10-06-2010, 06:02 PM
WSJ OP-ED

The real historical parallel may be 1894 when Republicans took 100 seats.

By JOHN FUND

As Election Day draws closer, every major public opinion poll shifts from interviewing registered voters to those whom it identifies as "likely" voters. Gallup, the oldest U.S. polling company, first developed the model it uses for identifying likely voters back in 1950 and its final election polls have proven highly accurate.

Yesterday, Gallup delivered its first 2010 "likely voter" poll and the results floored the political community. In the generic ballot question, which asks which party a voter would favor in a generic House contest, Gallup gave the GOP a 46% to 42% edge. But then Gallup applied two versions of its "likely voter" turnout model. In its "high turnout model," Republicans led Democrats by 53% to 40%. In its "low turnout model," the GOP edge was a stunning 56% to 38%. That kind of margin in favor of Republicans has never been seen in Gallup surveys.

CONTINUE: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703843804575534062655370740.html?m od=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion

forsmant
10-06-2010, 06:08 PM
You say you want a revolution? Vote in guys willing to fire the FBI and IRS. Take down for life pensions and fire some god damn people.

Matt Collins
10-06-2010, 06:32 PM
1984 is a bad year..... oh wait... 1894!?!? Oh... ok... dyslexia sometimes a problem is

:p

TonyFromTheBronx
10-06-2010, 07:12 PM
Repubs took 80 in 1938 anti-FDR backlash...

JohnEngland
10-07-2010, 03:31 AM
I think these elections are going to be closer than the pundits are thinking. The Republicans will make gains but not by as much as the chattering classes think. The unions have a lot of taxpayer bailout money to spend on elections.

Thus, the Democrats will declare that they've "saved or created" a number of house/senate seats.

Slutter McGee
10-07-2010, 07:14 AM
I don't want the Republicans to pick up that many seats. Just want them to get a big enough lead in the House to block the Obama Agenda...not enough that they start ignoring fiscal sanity again, and start promoting more stuff like the PATRIOT act.

Sincerely,

Slutter McGee

Aratus
10-07-2010, 07:41 AM
the 1894 election had a youthful governor from the state of ohio traveling by rail
around our nation giving speeches for the GOP candidates that year. in two years
time he would go on to defeat william jennings bryan after grover celevand lost
control of the Democratic party. i read the sweep of 1894 as a bill mckinley wave...

Dianne
10-07-2010, 07:01 PM
Keep in mind that republicans are just as corrupt as democrats; all rabid dogs owned by the same greedy masters. All best of friends at the dinner table, but actors who attempt to make their hatred for each other look real. Think of World Wide Wrestling, the way the guys love each other off the stage; but today you win, tomorrow I win.

Don't buy into republican versus democrat... They are all scum, bred from the same trailer trash called the New World Order.

tpreitzel
10-07-2010, 08:19 PM
Like I said elsewhere, this upcoming election could be one of historic proportion in the US. We'll see. As our country is on the rocks, our republic certainly needs a reprieve from the goons at the top pulling the strings of both political parties.

One of the great aspects of this upcoming election is the increasing number of candidates in the GOP advocating a more constitutional stance on issues. As a group, we worked much harder over the past two years to get some credible constitutional candidates to run for office and some of them won their primaries, the second most important part of any election.

Fozz
10-07-2010, 08:24 PM
This was not good news. Back then, the Democrat Party was the party of liberty.

cindy25
10-08-2010, 09:08 AM
not 100 but 130

http://clerk.house.gov/art_history/house_history/partyDiv.html

cindy25
10-08-2010, 09:09 AM
sorry double post

Aratus
10-08-2010, 11:32 AM
1894 + 1994 = 2010? either my math is lousy
or my historic analogies are most totally apt!

Stary Hickory
10-08-2010, 11:50 AM
The Republicans of 1894 were probably still Lincoln "American system" Republicans. I don't know when the Democratic party turned progressive but I imagine even in 1894 the Democrats were the guys you would want. But I could be wrong.