Need Your Opinion - Quick!

[skiingff]

Ok, we've designed 2 different versions of the military ad based on ya'lls input. Which do you like best?

http://www.operationnh.com/newspaperad2.jpg

-OR-

http://www.operationnh.com/alt.jpg

[KewlRonduderules]

I like the first one

[micahnelson]

the first one. Excellent work btw.

[Ridiculous]

They are both good.

Also, does Paul still have the top military donations in Q3? If not you should put in small print underneath the military donations part *based on 2nd Quarter Donations.

[CodeMonkey]

I like the first one. That box around the issues sort of grounds the photo, which seems to float and looks out of place in the 2nd.

Although, I would hate to make you edit it again, but the photo might be even better inside the box in the top right corner, to the right of the first couple of bullet points.

[uncloned21]

Um, every time the news has mentioned the military it has been the most out of the REPUBLICAN candidates. Please check on this before finalizing the ad!!

[skiingff]

Um, every time the news has mentioned the military it has been the most out of the REPUBLICAN candidates. Please check on this before finalizing the ad!!

Source:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/5223477.html

[uncloned21]

Source:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/5223477.html+

Ok, cool. Just checking! Nice ad!

[ValidusCustodiae]

The first one is much more aesthetically arranged =c)

[LibertyEagle]

The first one, hands down. The boxes need to be on opposite corners. Otherwise, the entire ad is out of balance.

[SlapItHigh]

I like the first one. That box around the issues sort of grounds the photo, which seems to float and looks out of place in the 2nd.

Same here.

[quickmike]

First one.

Only change I would make to anything, would be to add an updated picture to it somehow along with the older pictures.

I dont know, just showing old photos of him might give some people out there the impression that hes just a thing of the past. Alot of people are weird like that.

[davidkachel]

This ad quite plainly was not designed by a professional.
Please consult a professional. Otherwise your money will be wasted.
The layout is wrong, the photos are wrong, the text is wrong.
And I don't mean just a little bit wrong either.

There must be lots of layout designers and copywriters in the RP campaign. Please get some of them to help you. This ad as it stands is a serious mistake.

[Paulitician]

Why isn't there a current photo of Ron Paul on this ad?

[rpfreedom08]

Can you put Hope for America somewhere in the title? I think that resinates with people alot. Everyone knows we need some hope in these dark years of the bush administration.

[runderwo]

Ugh, PLEASE fix this sentence to read this way:


He opposed launching a preemptive strike on Iraq, stating that Iraq posed no threat to us, and Iraq was not responsible for the attacks on the USA.

Using "they" everywhere confuses the reader whether you're talking about Iraq or about the terrorists you just mentioned.

[DrNoZone]

This ad quite plainly was not designed by a professional.
Please consult a professional. Otherwise your money will be wasted.
The layout is wrong, the photos are wrong, the text is wrong.
And I don't mean just a little bit wrong either.

There must be lots of layout designers and copywriters in the RP campaign. Please get some of them to help you. This ad as it stands is a serious mistake.

Wow, sounds like you know it all. Why don't you do us a favor and design the PERFECT ad you seem to have in mind? In other words, make your criticism constructive.

[slantedview]

Nice ads.

[skiingff]

This ad quite plainly was not designed by a professional.


Actually, it was. Linda Lagana is a professional designer.

[TechnoGuyRob]

Someone PLEASE make the fact he's for pulling out of Iraq RIGHT NOW really clear!

[jgmaynard]

1st one - MUCH better balanced, IMNSHO :)

JM

[runderwo]

Please change the wording like I mentioned to make it clear that "they" means "Iraq" and not "the terrorists"...