PDA

View Full Version : The Empty Suit in the White House




Anti Federalist
10-02-2010, 01:04 AM
The Empty Suit in the White House
Posted by Lew Rockwell on October 1, 2010 09:09 PM

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/66492.html#more-66492

Thanks to the reader who sent me this “interview with an insider.” It reads like a Clinton Machine production, but is fascinating nonetheless:

A longtime Washington, D.C., insider, and former adviser to the Obama election campaign and transition team, speaks out on an administration in crisis, and a president increasingly withdrawn from the job of President.

2008 gave America an incredibly charismatic candidate for President of the United States. Speech after speech showed a candidate with increasing momentum as primary race after primary race concluded. And then came the nomination, more speeches, culminating in an election night victory.

According to the person sitting across from me, those were incredibly exciting times, even for one who had been a participant with three previous presidential hopefuls. Barack Obama appeared to move from one city to the next effortlessly, gaining confidence and motivation with each campaign stop. He was remarkable to watch. He took the script, elevated it with his oration, left the crowds screaming for more, and then would do it all over again, time after time after time. On the campaign trail, Obama is a machine.

When I asked this insider if the media gave candidate Obama an assist throughout his campaign, it elicits a sly smile.

Sure – we definitely had people in the media on our side. Absolutely. We went so far as to give them specific ideas for coverage. The ones who took that advice from the campaign were granted better access, and Obama was the biggest story in 2008, so yeah, that gave us a lot of leverage.

Could Obama have succeeded without the media’s help?

Yeah, I think so. As I said, on the campaign trail he is very-very good. The opposition didn’t have near the energy, or the celebrity attraction that Obama brings. Plus, the country was burned out after eight years of Bush. We knew that going in. We knew that if we won the Democrat nomination, we were likely going to cruise our way to the White House – and that is exactly what we did.”

But after Obama was sworn in, things began to change?

Almost immediately. Obama loved to campaign. He clearly didn’t like the work of being President though, and that attitude was felt by the entire White House staff within weeks after the inauguration. Obama the tireless, hard working candidate became a very tepid personality to us. And the few news stories that did come out against him were the only things he seemed to care about. He absolutely obsesses over Fox News. For being so successful, Barack Obama is incredibly thin-skinned. He takes everything very personally.

And you state he despises Joe Biden?

Oh yeah. That is very well known in the White House. Obama chose Biden for one reason – to have an older white guy with some international policy credentials. Period. If Biden has all of this international experience that Obama found so valuable, why has he buried him under the pile of crap that became the stimulus bill? What does Joe Biden know about budgets and economics? Not much – but Obama didn’t care. Give Joe a job and get him the hell out of my hair – that pretty much sums up the president’s feelings toward Joe Biden.

What about Hillary Clinton?

Obama is scared to death of Hillary. He doesn’t trust her – obsesses over her almost as much as he does Fox News. He respects her though, which might be why he fears her so much as well. He talks the game, but when it comes down to it, she has played the game on a far tougher level than he has, and Obama knows that.

How about Bill Clinton?

I never heard Obama say anything about Bill Clinton personally, though I was told he has cracked a few jokes about the former president since getting into the White House. I have heard that Bill Clinton does not like Barack Obama. That really started when Obama played the race card against him during the primary campaign. Apparently Clinton was apoplectic over that and still hasn’t gotten over it. If there is one thing I have learned in this town – don’t make an enemy of Bill Clinton.

So if Obama doesn’t appear interested in the job of president, what does he do day after day?

Well, he takes his meetings just like any other president would, though even then, he seems to lack a certain focus and on a few occasions, actually leaves with the directive that be given a summary of the meeting at a later date. I hear he plays a lot of golf, and watches a lot of television – ESPN mainly. I’ll tell you this – if you want to see President Obama get excited about a conversation, turn it to sports. That gets him interested. You start talking about Congress, or some policy, and he just kinda turns off. It’s really very strange. I mean, we were all led to believe that this guy was some kind of intellectual giant, right? Ivy League and all that. Well, that is not what I saw. Barack Obama doesn’t have a whole lot of intellectual curiosity. When he is off script, he is what I call a real “slow talker”. Lots of ummms, and lots of time in between answers where you can almost see the little wheel in his head turning very slowly. I am not going to say the president is a dumb man, because he is not, but yeah, there was a definite letdown when you actually hear him talking without the script.

That sounds like you are calling Obama stupid to me.

No – I am not going to call him stupid. He just doesn’t strike me as particularly smart. Bill Clinton is a smart guy – he would run intellectual circles around Barack Obama. And Bill Clinton loved the politics of being president. Obama seems to think he shouldn’t have to be bothered, which has created a considerable amount of conflict among his staff.

So how bad are things at the White House these days?

I don’t know about right now, because I have not been there in over a month. But I still hear things, and I know what it was like when I left. It’s not good. As bad as it might look to voters based on what they do know, it’s much worse. The infighting is off the charts. You got a Chief of Staff who despises cabinet members, advisors who despise the Chief of Staff, a President and First Lady having their own issues…

Come again – what about the First Lady?

(The insider takes a deep breath) Ok, look, just like any other marriage, folks have issues. The Obamas are no different, except of course they are very high profile. I was told they were having issues before the campaign, and they have even more issues now. Maybe that is why Obama seems so detached – not so much the stress of the White House, but the stress of personal issues. I can certainly relate to that kind of situation.

Care to clarify some more on the Obama marriage?

No. That is all I will say about that. Don’t ask again.

Ok, back to President Obama then. In just a few words, how would you describe him these days?

Like I said, it’s been a while since I was last at the White House, but I don’t have a problem saying that the president is losing it. I don’t mean he is like losing his mind. I mean to say that he is losing whatever spark he had during the campaign. When you take away the crowds, Obama gets noticeably smaller. He shrinks up inside of himself. He just doesn’t seem to have the confidence to do the job of President, and it’s getting worse and worse. Case in point – just a few days before I left, I saw first hand the President of the United States yelling at a member of his staff. He was yelling like a spoiled child. And then he pouted for several moments after. I wish I was kidding, or exaggerating, but I am not. The President of the United States threw a temper tantrum.

The jobs reports are always setting him off, and he is getting increasingly conspiratorial over the unemployment numbers. I never heard it myself, but was told that Obama thinks the banking system is out to get him now. That they and the big industries are making him pay for trying to regulate them more. That is the frame of mind the President is in these days. And you know what? Maybe he is right, who knows?

Will Obama run again in 2012?

I don’t know. That subject was never brought up again after 2008, at least not around me. If he does, I think it would have more to do with allowing him another year and a half of campaigning again. He just loves it so much. He really needs the crowds, the cheering, the support of the people.

Can he win in 2012?

Oh – absolutely. Who else campaigns as well as Barack Obama? Nobody. What politician is more loved and supported by the media? Nobody. I don’t see the Republicans offering up a candidate as powerful as Obama. I mean Sarah Palin? Really? Obama would defeat her by a 20 point landslide! Romney? The Republicans will enjoy these midterm elections, but 2012 is Obama’s year if he chooses to run again. As a president, Obama has many flaws, but as a candidate, he is near flawless.

But would another four years of an Obama presidency be the best thing for America?

(Long pause) Now that is a much more interesting question right there, and a question I think more and more Democrat Party insiders are asking themselves these days, myself included. I am going to come right out and say it – No. Obama is not up to the job of being president. He simply doesn’t seem to care about the work involved. You want to know what? Obama is lazy. He really is. And it is getting worse and worse. Would another four years of Obama be the best thing for America? No it would not. What this country needs is a president who is focused on the job more than on themselves. Obama is not that individual. I actually hope he doesn’t run again. Looking back, as much fun as the campaign in 2008 was, Hillary Clinton should have been the nominee. Hillary was ready to be president. Obama was not ready. He had never lost a campaign. Everything was handed to him. He doesn’t really understand the idea of work – real, hard, get your heart and soul into it work. And frankly, that is very disappointing to a whole lot of us…

So you still wish to keep your name hidden from the public? Why?

I intend to remain working in this town for a bit longer. A public disclosure might complicate that just a bit given who is in power right now. But I won’t be the last one from the current administration coming forward. After the midterms, there will be a number of us speaking about what is really going on in the Democrat Party, if for nothing else because it’s such a damn mess right now.

What do you mean “it’s a damn mess”? I mean just what I said. The Democrat Party is the most chaotic I have ever seen it – and that goes back almost 30 years.

So who is to blame? We all are. By we I mean those of us who were working within the party power structure the last ten years or so. We got so caught up in the hate Bush mentality, we let the party get hijacked by our own far left. That was disaster the moment it happened. The disaster that will be the midterm election in 2010 started in November of 2006 when Pelosi and Reid took over the Democrat Party. Those two have only brought trouble to the Democrat Party since day one of that time.

How do you mean?

(A long pause…) Look, I’ve been in the Democrat Party in one way or other, be it campaigns, fundraising, lobbying, whatever…we lost our way in 2006. We put in place a Speaker of the House who is an absolute public relations train wreck. The lady is a… She’s tough. Yeah, she’s real tough. But outside of the halls of Congress, forget it. She’s a nut to the American people because America was and is a right of center country. As a Democrat I say that, because I understand it. Bill Clinton understood it. Pelosi, Reid, Obama…they don’t accept that fact.

You mention Clinton a lot.

Yeah, I do because Bill Clinton was the very best politician of our time and I got to see it up close for a period of time and I am still amazed at just how good he was. Second, I think Bill Clinton was a damn good president. He should be recognized more for just how good he really was.

And you don’t place Obama in the same league as Bill Clinton?

(Laughter) Hell no. Obama has only been in office a couple of years, so that isn’t even a fair question right now. But what I have seen of Barack Obama has not left me with the confidence to say he will be as good a president as Bill Clinton. Maybe he will get it figured out before 2012, and I sure as hell hope so because the Republicans are getting some real oddballs running their own show over there and that scares me too.

What scares you more as president – Sarah Palin or Barack Obama?

(Hands to head) Oh boy. What a choice! People would kill me for saying this – actually you know what, there are more and more of us Democrats saying what I am going to say in one form or another… Sarah Palin understands America more than Barack Obama. Yes, she has a minority of our far left who hates her, and some in our media are part of that group, but overall, she seems to get America. Americans aren’t a complicated people, and neither is Sarah Palin, so that probably works in her favor. But President Obama is just out of touch. He really doesn’t understand what America is. What it’s about. Or who it is. And that is a real problem for him – and the Democrat Party at this moment in its history.

Are you saying you would vote for Sarah Palin over Barack Obama?

No, I don’t think I could do that. As much as I admire Palin’s ability to connect with the American people, I just can’t stand her politics. I am a pro-choice Democrat. I support unions. I support welfare programs. Sarah Palin understands America, but that doesn’t mean she understands the best parts of America. That being said, I think President Obama understands hardly any of America. That is probably a big reason he appears so lost these days.

Last time you mentioned trouble with the Obama marriage. I am not going to ask you to elaborate on that specifically, but could you tell us if you like Michelle Obama?

Like is not a word we use in D.C. very much. Do I respect the First Lady? Sure. She seems like a strong woman, a good mother. I wasn’t around her really enough to say anything more than that. Or, at least, I would rather not.

Were you afraid of her?

No – not anymore than anyone else who was around her as briefly as I was. Here is what I get from the First Lady. She is very much the Chicago ideologue. Nancy Pelosi is the far left of the Democrat Party, right? Well, Michelle Obama might be to the left of Nancy Pelosi. She really doesn’t care for how things work in the country and she wants to see it all changed. I can respect that, though I would guess she is far too liberal even for me – and I consider myself a liberal Democrat.

Could she be mean?

Mean? She’s the First Lady. She is a strong, influential woman in America. I don’t know what you are trying to ask me there – though I suspect what you are trying to get at and all I will say to that is, “Don’t go there.”

If you had President Obama here right now and you could give him some advice that he would follow, what would that advice be?

(Long silence. Eyes closed – long sigh) Man, that’s a tough question right there. I have thought about it a lot lately. I know I’m not the only one who left that White House feeling really let down, but maybe that wasn’t fair to the President. Maybe our own expectations got so high that he had no choice but to let us down…some advice, huh? Hopefully without sounding disrespectful, I would tell the President to pull his head out of his ass. To man up, grow up, and start to pay attention to what the American people want and need. That is a big-big flaw with this president. He comes at it from the position of thinking he knows what we need because we don’t have the ability to know for ourselves. And he doesn’t respect any opinion that is different from his own. He just doesn’t care to know any other side to any given issue. I really believe it’s a maturity thing. I think our president needs to grow up. I hate to put it that way, but there it is. President Obama – grow up.

WaterWine41
10-02-2010, 02:20 AM
Compelling, but how are we to take this as credible?

I respect Lew, but he doesn't mention any specifics of why he takes this "interview with an insider" from some random reader as a genuine interview. It certainly isn't presented in a format that would be familiar to any student of journalism. Why would this "insider" speak to somebody who couldn't format their interview legibly?

I'm not calling poppycock on this one; I just want to hear everybody else's thoughts on what I'm missing so that I can assume that this is genuine.

Having a hearty dissatisfaction with CIA disinformation that routinely appears on the net, I have to ask these questions. Could this be some sort of trickery to lull us into complacency? Are we supposed to underestimate our foe so that we lose?

What does everybody else think?

Flirple
10-02-2010, 02:21 AM
Yeah this is getting spread around the internet but it is unsourced / anonymous.
Seems a bit too perfect to me. Who is the interviewer? Very fishy.

It's easy to criticize sloppy journalism. But harder to be the one that doesn't propagate unconfirmed material that confirms our biases.

WaterWine41
10-02-2010, 02:33 AM
Yeah this is getting spread around the internet but it is unsourced / anonymous.
Seems a bit too perfect to me. Who is the interviewer? Very fishy.

It's easy to criticize sloppy journalism. But harder to be the one that doesn't propagate unconfirmed material that confirms our biases.

Right, it sounds nice but should we really think of Obama as a paper tiger as this "interview" suggests? He's been pretty effective at screwing us so far. We need to re-double our efforts and take him seriously.

The lines about him being paranoid about bankers is laughable, because we all know that he WORKS for the bankers. If this article were written by a real insider telling the truth, I doubt they would claim that the bankers' biggest asset is fearful of them. What are they going to do, send him more money?!?

Vessol
10-02-2010, 02:48 AM
I believe it's true.

Why? Because he sucks Bill Clinton dry. He's a center-left Democrat, they love the FUCK out of the Clintons.

This interview really does nothing. I personally would prefer Obama watching ESPN all day rather than have him fuck us over more and more.

I do find him saying that the President thinks there is some conspiracy by the bankers AGAINST him, -hilarious-. Considering all he appointed to his staff and cabinet. Pretty much everyone related to banks..yeah.

lynnf
10-02-2010, 06:23 AM
Right, it sounds nice but should we really think of Obama as a paper tiger as this "interview" suggests? He's been pretty effective at screwing us so far. We need to re-double our efforts and take him seriously.

The lines about him being paranoid about bankers is laughable, because we all know that he WORKS for the bankers. If this article were written by a real insider telling the truth, I doubt they would claim that the bankers' biggest asset is fearful of them. What are they going to do, send him more money?!?


on the banker part, even insiders can't always see the whole picture, they only see what is within the walls of their own compartment.

RM918
10-02-2010, 08:25 AM
When I saw it on LRC, seeing parts written like, '(The insider takes a deep breath)' this screamed at me to be a work of fiction. The words just seem too perfectly planned out for it to have come from a real person.

pcosmar
10-02-2010, 09:14 AM
Ha,
Regardless of whether the "interview" was genuine, I had called Obama an empty suit a long time ago. I believe it was before the Dem Primaries were over.
The Guy came from nowhere, with no reputation and no notable accomplishments.
Was proclaimed to be a great speaker, (I just never saw that), and was promoted by the Party.
Even Clinton never put up much fight.

The guy was chosen and anointed, and it seemed obvious to me.
And I believe that McCain was chosen to be the loser. Deliberately.

Empty Suit is accurate, Puppet on a string is as well.

acptulsa
10-02-2010, 09:57 AM
What? A song-and-dance man in the Oval Office?

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/bushvideos/youtube/bushdance.htm

Couldn't happen.

TNforPaul45
10-02-2010, 10:31 AM
Compelling, but how are we to take this as credible?

I respect Lew, but he doesn't mention any specifics of why he takes this "interview with an insider" from some random reader as a genuine interview. It certainly isn't presented in a format that would be familiar to any student of journalism. Why would this "insider" speak to somebody who couldn't format their interview legibly?

I'm not calling poppycock on this one; I just want to hear everybody else's thoughts on what I'm missing so that I can assume that this is genuine.

Having a hearty dissatisfaction with CIA disinformation that routinely appears on the net, I have to ask these questions. Could this be some sort of trickery to lull us into complacency? Are we supposed to underestimate our foe so that we lose?

What does everybody else think?

Personally, I trust Lew more than I would others.

Besides, it's not hard to find an Obama white house insider.

I personally know two of them. No joke.

Woohoo for me! You may sarcastically say, but like I said, not hard.

That is all.

Anti Federalist
10-02-2010, 11:26 AM
FWIW, I posted it without comment.

No sources, no actual quotes, no idea where or when or with whom this interview took place.

Everybody's guess is as good as mine as to the story's veracity.

Still a good read...;)