PDA

View Full Version : John Boehner 'Affair' To Be Focus Of New York Times Expose, NY Post Reports




cindy25
09-24-2010, 08:27 PM
this will mean a different choice for speaker?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/24/john-boehner-affair-lisbeth-lyons_n_738007.html

oyarde
09-24-2010, 08:31 PM
Not if she denies it ? You know who the next two are in line .

awake
09-24-2010, 08:40 PM
This is why you have the CIA. They have files on anyone and everyone for this very reason. Leverage.

oyarde
09-24-2010, 08:45 PM
Will the newspaper use the same author from the McCain story ?

specsaregood
09-24-2010, 08:52 PM
Clearly the allegation is unfounded and false. Afterall, he is a republican and his supposed lover is a woman.

sailingaway
09-24-2010, 09:08 PM
dang it, if the voters vote him out I wanted it to be clear it was over the 'pledge', not let them pretend it was some nonsense like this.

james1906
09-24-2010, 09:42 PM
Clearly the allegation is unfounded and false. Afterall, he is a republican and his supposed lover is a woman.

Thread winner.

cindy25
09-25-2010, 12:03 AM
he will not lose his house seat, but might not be the choice for speaker; when Newt stepped down some guy was speaker for a day or two. then there was a scandal and they chose Hastert

Stary Hickory
09-25-2010, 12:07 AM
So no evidence of an affair and both parties deny that anything happened? Is there a story? I mean really this is probably better suited for The Enquirer or a trash magazine.

Stary Hickory
09-25-2010, 12:12 AM
Clearly the allegation is unfounded and false. Afterall, he is a republican and his supposed lover is a woman.

Clearly you don't know what ypou are talking about. You have zero evidence except conjecture from a liberal rag who would love to take down the GOP (probably house majority leader). The liberal rags have an agenda always have. The fact they have an agenda combined with the fact they have no evidence combined with the fact both parties say it's not true....well how can you reach any kind of conclusion?