PDA

View Full Version : Contract with America version 2.0




Anti Federalist
09-20-2010, 10:46 PM
GOP Set to Roll Out Formal Agenda
by Shannon Bream | September 20, 2010

After months of being bashed for having no agenda, other than attacking Democrats, Republican leaders are gearing up to unveil a detailed "governing document" of their own.

While it's drawing comparisons to 1994's "Contract with America," sources say this new document is very different. There will be no grand unveiling on the steps of the U.S. Capitol, with scores of lawmakers and candidates signing on the dotted line. Instead, the new plan will be rolled out at a suburban Virginia lumber yard just outside Washington.

Themes are expected to include: job creation, cutting government spending and repealing or counteracting recent health care legislation. That's welcome news to the man who is the president of Tart Lumber Company, Craig Fritsche. Come Thursday, he's hoping to hear GOP leaders say that they plan to push to extend Bush-era tax cuts - for all income levels.

"We don't need to be hit during this recession with a tax increase," Fritsche says, adding, "You could say it's just an expiration of the tax cuts, but it's a tax increase."

Along with financial priorities, many within the party want to be sure social issues have a place on the agenda. Speaking at last weekend's Values Voter Summit, Congressman Mike Pence (R-Ind.), who won the event's straw poll for attendees' 2012 presidential pick, said, ""We must not remain silent when great moral battles are being waged." He continued, "Those who would have us ignore the battle being fought over life, marriage and religious liberty, have forgotten the lessons of history." Congressman Joseph Pitts (R-Pa.), who says he's been involved in discussions about the new document, reports that social issues will be included in the final draft.

The GOP is expected to outline roughly 20 items, most of them legislative in nature. Others will be aimed at how Congress itself operates: forcing authors of bills to articulate their constitutionality and a mandatory 72-hour reading period for House members before any bill goes to the floor for a vote.

Bradley Blakeman, a Republican strategist, says it's time to get back to basics, "What makes us a party, our core beliefs, where we've strayed and what do we have to concentrate on to win."



Read more: http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/09/20/gop-set-roll-out-formal-agenda#ixzz108Vu2VyB

Danke
09-20-2010, 10:50 PM
"Come Thursday, he's hoping to hear GOP leaders say that they plan to push to extend Bush-era tax cuts - for all income levels."

Extend, why not make them permanent?

FrankRep
09-20-2010, 10:51 PM
The Grinch Who Stole Conservatism
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?p=1997

Newt Gingrich: The Establishment’s Conservative
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2396-newt-gingrich-the-establishments-conservative?showall=1



The new Contract from America recycles the Gingrich revolution. by Jack Kenny

Con Game for America (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/opinion/959-jack-kenny/3334-con-game-for-america)

Jack Kenny | The New American (http://www.thenewamerican.com/)
16 April 2010


The Real Newt Gingrich
The Real Newt Gingrich on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/6445068)

cindy25
09-21-2010, 12:58 AM
"Come Thursday, he's hoping to hear GOP leaders say that they plan to push to extend Bush-era tax cuts - for all income levels."

Extend, why not make them permanent?

both sides want to use it as an issue to rally their base, hence endless extensions

Matt Collins
09-21-2010, 02:07 AM
Why not just adherence to the Constitution? It'd be a good start.

Jim Casey
09-21-2010, 03:58 AM
The GOP is expected to outline roughly 20 items, most of them legislative in nature. Others will be aimed at how Congress itself operates: forcing authors of bills to articulate their constitutionality and a mandatory 72-hour reading period for House members before any bill goes to the floor for a vote.

Bradley Blakeman, a Republican strategist, says it's time to get back to basics, "What makes us a party, our core beliefs, where we've strayed and what do we have to concentrate on to win."

Read more: http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/09/20/gop-set-roll-out-formal-agenda#ixzz108Vu2VyB
This is a smart move by the Republicans. This contract is much more in line with what the American people want than what was offered in 1994.

noxagol
09-21-2010, 05:26 AM
And I'm sure that as soon as they get into office they will crumple this 'contract' up and use it as TP.

Slutter McGee
09-21-2010, 07:46 AM
"Come Thursday, he's hoping to hear GOP leaders say that they plan to push to extend Bush-era tax cuts - for all income levels."

Extend, why not make them permanent?

Well for one, Obama is much more likely to sign an extension than a bill that makes it permanent, and even with a landside Republicans wont hold a two thirds majority.

I am ok with this.

Sincerely,

Slutter McGee

specsaregood
09-21-2010, 07:59 AM
"Come Thursday, he's hoping to hear GOP leaders say that they plan to push to extend Bush-era tax cuts - for all income levels."

Extend, why not make them permanent?

Better yet, just end the income tax.

Elwar
09-21-2010, 08:07 AM
This should be the Contract With America 2.0:


http://www.archives.gov/historical-docs/doc-content/images/constitution-m.jpg

Brooklyn Red Leg
09-21-2010, 08:17 AM
As I've said elsewhere: 'fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me'. Gingrich and the other sell-out NeoCons can take their Contract on America 2.0 and cram it!

erowe1
09-21-2010, 08:30 AM
One thing they should put in this contract that I don't think they will, but that would be a home run if they did, would be a commitment to repeal laws, starting with Obamacare, but not stopping there. They should say something like, "The sum of all legislation we bring to a vote in this Congressional session will, if signed into law, result in the U.S. code being shorter in 2012 than in 2010."

I also really hope they keep any phony anti-earmark and phony balanced budget amendment stuff out of it.

GunnyFreedom
09-21-2010, 08:33 AM
Shared on FB with the following comment:


Contract With America 2.0 - it sure is better than the 1994 Contract, but whatever happened with that one? I'll be pleased as punch if they actually honor this one, but fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. If we really want a Contract with America, let's try the US Constitution! We haven't tried honoring that one since 1913...

itshappening
09-21-2010, 08:47 AM
Social issues = distraction

they still wont tell us what they will cut.

ChaosControl
09-21-2010, 08:58 AM
I read this as "How Gullible are Americans 2.0"

Travlyr
09-21-2010, 09:25 AM
As I've said elsewhere: 'fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me'. Gingrich and the other sell-out NeoCons can take their Contract on America 2.0 and cram it!

My sentiments exactly!

Stary Hickory
09-21-2010, 09:58 AM
I am disappointed for the mention of the importance of "social" issues. Obey the Constitution and stop worrying about what people are doing with their lives. Washington DC is not the place to decide these things and it is not authorized under the Constitution.

Philhelm
09-21-2010, 11:25 AM
Bradley Blakeman, a Republican strategist, says it's time to get back to basics, "What makes us a party, our core beliefs, where we've strayed and what do we have to concentrate on to win."

That's all I need to know about this.