Sue The Fed

[Elwar]

The Litigation Plan

Our Litigation Plan will be loosely patterned after the Tobacco litigation model executed during the 1980’s and 1990’s; only far more organized, coordinated and focused in order to provide shared access of all discovery materials and briefs developed to all of our network law firms and prosecutors nationwide. The litigation activities will be divided among three broad areas: a) research; b) analysis and dissemination of discovery materials and briefs, and c) litigation coordination. The Company will recruit several hundred to several thousand highly-respected small to mid-sized litigating law firms to pursue the class action litigation for their representative plaintiffs (live persons, companies, Municipalities, etc.) residing in their respective geographic areas. Names and contact information will be regularly updated by the Company to the local litigators from our database of co-plaintiffs obtained through the www.SUEtheFED.com web portal.


http://www.suethefed.com/

[free1]

They will try to say you don't have standing to sue because they are a government entity. Of course it's easy to prove they are not because congress can't even audit them. Congress never had the authority to give them any powers.

On top of that they are illegal because they are as independent from the government as any other company and therefore have no delegated authority from the people to coin or regulate the value of our money.

Yes, congress calls in a CEO of a company and questions them just like they do the "CEO" of the fed, but that's as far as it goes with the fed, so they are truly independent.

They took your inheritance by lawyer trickery and printing money from thin air and then asking for it's repayment with substance (your labor) plus they got interest on non-existent non-substance backed money, it's criminal fraud and that's actionable, with no limitations on how far back you can go with it.

We should extradite the bankers who did this and prosecute them.

You should urge your group to use the above info.

[Elwar]

You should urge your group to use the above info.

It's not my group...just heard some guy last night on the radio talk about it and checked it out.

[free1]

“Top 20” Potential Civil Causes of Action:

1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty
2. Breach of Contract
3. Conducting a Ponzi Scheme
4. Theft
5. Tortuous Interference
6. Unlawful seizure of Account holders funds
7. Accounting malpractice
8. Fraud in the Inducement
9. Banking Fraud
10. Consumer Protection Fraud
11. Detrimental Reliance
12. Gross Negligence
13. Unjust Enrichment
14. Failure to Perform
15. Deceptive Business Practices
16. Unconscionability
17. Willful Infliction of Emotional Distress
18. Against Public Policy
19. Securities Fraud
20. Other

(from the web site)

[idirtify]

Wow. Thousands of law firms suing the richest organization in the world. That would be quite a spectacle.

One problem might be getting those law firms to forget about the fact that much of their bread and butter comes from the FED, and to go ahead and bite a hand that feeds them.

[thetruthhurtsthefed]

This will be the ultimate test for justice in america. Justice will Truly be unbiased. If this goes through the world will rejoice and follow! I do hold my breath though, many will be manipulated, murdered and persuaded otherwise at the hands of the puppet masters (FED).

[Mike4Freedom]

Everyone on this forum should sign up. I am now a co plaintiff. Well, when they call me, lol.

[free1]

"Transparency and better financial reporting are far better options when it comes to regulating the banking and securities industries. Yet the government still doesn't seem to get it. People aren't upset because corporations, banks or others, are profiting. We are upset because of the ways in which corporations, banks and others, profit. We are upset at practices that obfuscate and exploit."

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-bank-story-no-one-is-talking-about-2010-09-10

[Seraphim]

Wow. Thousands of law firms suing the richest organization in the world. That would be quite a spectacle.

One problem might be getting those law firms to forget about the fact that much of their bread and butter comes from the FED, and to go ahead and bite a hand that feeds them.

Sue for gold, silver, stocks in commercial banks held by the Fed. Sue for the property sitting in Fanny and Freddie's "warehouses". Sue for stocks in the oil companies held by the Fed and it's controlling interests. Sue JP Morgan for blatant silver manipulation. Sue Goldman Sachs for buying it's way into the Obama Administration and robbing the people blind while getting a subsequent GIGANTIC tax cut that is a big slap in the face for everyone paying 20 plus % in taxes working their ASSES off.

Sue CNN, FOX, ABC for covering it all up. Sue Monsanto for littering the Earth with their legally forced upon GMO crops. Sue the CIA for maliciously overthrowing foreign elected govts which has created WAR WAR WAR.

Where does it stop?

As the old Russian in The International said (paraphrase): Everyone is involved. EVERYONE. CIA, Govt, Banks, Military, Coporations, Drug cartels. EVERYONE.


HOW THE FUCK DO YOU DEFEAT AN ENTITY SO BIG THAT EVERYONE CURRENTLY NEEDS IT TO SURVIVE, EVEN IF IT IS TO THEIR OWN DEMISE OF FREEDOM AND HAPPINESS?

[specsaregood]

They will try to say you don't have standing to sue because they are a government entity. Of course it's easy to prove they are not because congress can't even audit them.


IIRC it is even easier than that, there is legal precedence. Somebody sued the government years ago over an automobile accident with a fed reserve vehicle. It was thrown because the court ruled that the fed wasn't a government entity. I don't remember the specifics but I do remember coming across the court docs online somewhere.

[free1]

IIRC it is even easier than that, there is legal precedence. Somebody sued the government years ago over an automobile accident with a fed reserve vehicle. It was thrown because the court ruled that the fed wasn't a government entity. I don't remember the specifics but I do remember coming across the court docs online somewhere.
Thanks, good to know.

[Jace]

..

[free1]

Sue the Fed and drop dead, like Mark Pittman. The coroner will say it was a massive heart attack, and the media will say it runs in the family, even if it doesn't.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=afp8OC.OvRnI
That was then and this is now. The info about the fed is all over the place and a lot more, a lot, lot more, people know about how it works now.

They can't brush it under the rug anymore.

[Jace]

..

[Teaser Rate]

I'd like to respond to some of the bullet points made on the first page of the website and on its "Replacing the Fed" page.

- Many people do not know that the Federal Reserve is a private company and not a government agency.

Even more people do not know that the Fed's board of governors and its chairpersons are confirmed by congress and that all its profits are put back into the treasury.

- In fact, the Fed is not part of the government in any way.

In fact, the Fed is part of the federal government and requires a level of independence in order to operate monetary policy without political pressure. The Fed is independent in the same way the Supreme Court is.

-Nearly all of the country’s economic problems will be solved when the Fed is abolished.

Actually, they wouldn't. As a matter of fact, if the Fed were to be abolished tomorrow, nearly all of the country's economic problems would become much worse.


---Replacing the Fed----


First, it would be entirely transparent. The only reason for secrecy is to hide something. An efficient system working in the public’s best interest would have nothing to hide and its administrators would have nothing to fear.

Actually, the central bank needs a certain level of privacy to do its job. It can't be an effective lender of last resort if a failing banks' name is published as soon as it calls for help.

Second, it would be fair, sustainable and create an environment of prosperity for all. Numerous non-interest bearing systems at the federal and state level have been shown to be mathematically sound and would produce economies that were both sustainable and equitable.

Interest is the price to pay for borrowing money. Without interest, the market wouldn't be able to allocate resources effectively.

Third, it would not be based on debt with interest (Usury); certainly at the Federal level. Other systems go further and propose non-interest bearing systems throughout the entire financial system. This requirement is based upon the knowledge that any system that operates under a Usury principle is unworkable since it can be shown to be mathematically unsustainable.

Actually, complex mathematical models demonstrate that a fractional-reserve banking system is perfectly sustainable. That is because the economy continuously grows along with the money supply.

[Jace]

..

[free1]

Wow. A fan of the Fed, I see. Posting on a Ron Paul message board...
A fool and his money are soon parted.... Oops! It's already been taken! Too bad.

Never, ever let bankers or politicians just print money.

[Teaser Rate]

Wow. A fan of the Fed, I see. Posting on a Ron Paul message board...

Could you further expand on the the need for Fed secrecy? I'd like to hear a rational explanation for Fed secrecy made here where 100 percent of the posters believe the Fed should be fully audited.

1-I’m not a fan of the Fed, but I don’t think you have to be one to acknowledge mistakes other people are making about it.

2-On the privacy issue, a Central Bank can’t operate with complete transparency and still effectively do its job. It’s a rather simple concept; if Bank A needs a loan to meet its immediate obligations, the Fed will help it and keep it hidden for a while in order to avoid causing a run on it. If Bank A’s shareholders and depositors find out right away, then there will be a run anyways and the whole point of the Central Bank’s safety net will be moot.

You can’t have a stable fractional banking system without a central bank ensuring such a short-term safety net. Reforming the entire system to a 100% reserve ratio or allowing competing currencies in the market can work to phase it out, but I don’t think that’s what the point I was responding to was advocating; the website’s point was that the government doesn't have to keep anything secret if it's working in the interest of the people, which is wrong in the case of central banking.

3-I actually support the audit of the Fed because I think that many decisions in late 2008 where made on political grounds and demonstrating that through an audit will hopefully have the effect of narrowing the Fed’s mandates and policy discretion.

[free1]

Transparency, even years later you got to keep it secret? I don't think so. Give them 1 month, then they have to disclose and heads can roll.

Besides if the money was backed by substance a lot would change and they wouldn't have to play all those little games they play.

"profits are put back into the treasury" - my ass. Then why pay any interest, it only goes in a circle anyway according to you. It goes to overseas bankers, but you have to dig to find out how. Our wealth is being stolen.

Fed is not part of the federal government, just because they pick a few people to be put in positions doesn't mean it's a government entity. Right now they could micro manage GM, is that a government entity?

All of the country's problems would get way better if the damn thing was gone, less damage if it was phased out, but with all the corruption in there you really just have to shut it down and figure America can handle it.

Simple, government says it will accept the fake money for a while and starts printing it's own (backed), Kennedy (JFK) was doing that. But no fed in between doing any transactions, it's gone that day, treasury takes over, just like a bankruptcy.

"fractional-reserve banking system is perfectly sustainable" if greedy humans weren't involved, pure socialism would be good too. Problem is you have lazy people who wouldn't work and those who would scam the system. Example: Welfare.

[Elwar]

- Many people do not know that the Federal Reserve is a private company and not a government agency.

Even more people do not know that the Fed's board of governors and its chairpersons are confirmed by congress and that all its profits are put back into the treasury.



And even MORE people know...:rolleyes:...that the choices for the board of governors and its chairpersons are selected from a short list of members of the Federal Reserve banks provided to the president who then appoints them, usurping the minting and coining powers reserved to Congress in the Constitution.

[osan]

“Top 20” Potential Civil Causes of Action:

1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty
2. Breach of Contract
3. Conducting a Ponzi Scheme
4. Theft
5. Tortuous Interference
6. Unlawful seizure of Account holders funds
7. Accounting malpractice
8. Fraud in the Inducement
9. Banking Fraud
10. Consumer Protection Fraud
11. Detrimental Reliance
12. Gross Negligence
13. Unjust Enrichment
14. Failure to Perform
15. Deceptive Business Practices
16. Unconscionability
17. Willful Infliction of Emotional Distress
18. Against Public Policy
19. Securities Fraud
20. Other

(from the web site)

If RICO doesn't apply here, then nothing does.

[osan]

Pittman died of a massive heart attack less than a year ago. He sued the Fed over TARP and was using the Freedom of Information Act in an attempt to reveal where the money went.

Pittman was an experienced, bulldog reporter in his 50s who understood finance and wasn't afraid to name names. His well-researched articles chronicled the economic meltdown of 2008 in plain language. But he died suddenly right on the cusp of victory, when he could have written the articles that blew the lid off the Fed.

Heart attack. Cancer. Suicide. Child porn on you laptop.

Be careful. If you sue the Fed, cover your bases and watch your back. They play for keeps.

Sound advice, that.

Never go anywhere unarmed and preferably never alone. The more the merrier in such a case. They are vicious people and will stop at nothing to scratch any itch that may arise.

[free1]

Distributed lawsuit.

Have a lot of people involved in the suit, have many lawyers representing them, encourage people to represent themselves and join the suit. Give away the paperwork and motions online.

What are they going to do, murder everyone?

You guys have really got to start thinking "outside the box" that your slave masters put you in.

[youngbuck]

2-On the privacy issue, a Central Bank can’t operate with complete transparency and still effectively do its job. It’s a rather simple concept;

Who cares what a Central Bank needs to operate? It's a rather simple concept; there should be no Central Bank at all!

"You see, here we have this parasite. And since this parasite exists, we need to provide it with the optimal environmental and dietary conditions for it to thrive. Yes, yes, we may have been better off without the parasite, but now that we have it we shall embrace it!"



Bullshit.

[free1]

Liberty bump

[free1]

So will this get popular now?

[Fields]

Does anyone know who exactly is behind this other than a vague "PatriotStorm"?