PDA

View Full Version : New Video - Jack Conway himself reacts to WHAS11 poll - "That poll is dead wrong!!!"




MRoCkEd
09-06-2010, 12:12 PM
http://www.whas11.com/news/local/Senate-candidate-Conway-reacts-to-latest-poll-102293189.html

YouTube - Jack Conway Doesn't Believe He Is Losing To Rand Paul (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaI5YL7J-1Q)

RonPaulFanInGA
09-06-2010, 12:18 PM
http://i53.tinypic.com/f0clm0.jpg

BamaFanNKy
09-06-2010, 12:21 PM
http://i53.tinypic.com/f0clm0.jpg

Stealing for newest blog

TheDriver
09-06-2010, 12:29 PM
YouTube - Jack Conway Doesn't Believe He Is Losing To Rand Paul (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaI5YL7J-1Q)

Sola_Fide
09-06-2010, 12:34 PM
Youre goin down Jack!

Matt Collins
09-06-2010, 12:43 PM
"our polling shows a dead heat"


http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x93/sonicspikesalbum/fluff-bw.jpg

malkusm
09-06-2010, 12:56 PM
Well, in fairness, I don't think the most recent poll is adjusted to account for the fact that he's one tough son of a bitch.

Natalie
09-06-2010, 12:59 PM
http://i53.tinypic.com/f0clm0.jpg

HAHAHAHAHA omg that is hilarious! I love it!

PatriotOne
09-06-2010, 01:23 PM
He's probably correct saying his internal polls show a dead heat. WHAS didn't poll Conways family, campaign staff, neighbors and co-workers like he did.

robertwerden
09-06-2010, 02:05 PM
One thing I've come to respect is the accuracy of external polls. During the 08 election we kept seeing low polls for Ron, and we always disputed them, but in the end 99% of them were dead on accurate.
It is common for internal polls, or polls done by stations that serve primarily a viewing audience of only one party (fox for republicans, MSNBC for dems) to have polls that are favorable to the party they serve, but when it is an external poll to a population that is well diverse in party affiliation they are typically correct.
Sorry Jack, your toast.

Matt Collins
09-06-2010, 02:17 PM
One thing I've come to respect is the accuracy of external polls. During the 08 election we kept seeing low polls for Ron, and we always disputed them, but in the end 99% of them were dead on accurate. Yeah, same here. :o

Cowlesy
09-06-2010, 02:22 PM
Conway should get that Jan Van Lohuisen guy to run a poll for him so Jack could have a poll showing him winning :P

What are the chances a progressive democrat is going to win in a Republican-held U.S. Senate seat in 2010 in KENTUCKY versus an extremely conservative opponent? ............

ctiger2
09-06-2010, 02:23 PM
He's probably correct saying his internal polls show a dead heat. WHAS didn't poll Conways family, campaign staff, neighbors and co-workers like he did.

Yea, and that means that 1/2 of Conway's family, campaign staff, neighbors and co-workers are voting for Rand.

ScotTX
09-06-2010, 02:32 PM
Jack seems to have a real problem with FACTS. They really seem to interfere with the fantasy world that he lives in.

TheDriver
09-06-2010, 02:40 PM
Jack seems to have a real problem with FACTS. They really seem to interfere with the fantasy world that he lives in.

Your response makes this video come to mind

YouTube - Jack Conway Tries To Spin His Flip-Flop on Bush Tax Cuts (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eT5QWb0Vdmk)

ScotTX
09-06-2010, 02:49 PM
Don't get me wrong, it has to be very difficult to have to taylor your message and position to the audience that's in front of you, and Jack does a pretty good job of it.

It's going ot become very hard for old school politicians like Jack to adapt to the new "No B.S." rules of the game of politics. Hopefully, he and his kind will become extinct very soon.

PatriotOne
09-06-2010, 03:46 PM
YouTube - Hit the road Jack! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8Tiz6INF7I)

LMAO...this has to be made part of a RP promo :D

sailingaway
09-06-2010, 04:19 PM
IN fairness, the various pollsters ARE now trying to wrestle with how do you reflect the enthusiasm of GOP voters, who will show up, and I think that is what Jack meant by a 'surge'. But he's acting like Survey USA intentionally screened by some magic formula, and what I understand they did was just call and ask voters questions going to how likely they were to vote. Those likely to vote were the mix they were, and REFLECTED more independents and GOP.

Right now, Rasmussen's forced mix by party makeup of the general population is giving results considered to be biased AGAINST the GOP because EVERYONE is predicting a major turn out gap.

But while the last few election cycles don't reflect the sort of voter momentum, I do wonder how these polled mixes line up with 1994 and 1980 -- other 'surge' years.