PDA

View Full Version : FaceBook Censors Pot Legalization Ad Of Libertarian Party




AlterEgo
08-25-2010, 08:55 AM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

August 25, 2010

Contact: Wes Benedict, Executive Director
E-mail: wes.benedict@lp.org
Phone: 202-333-0008 ext. 222

Libertarian Party protests Facebook censorship of its marijuana legalization ad

WASHINGTON - The Libertarian Party (LP) is protesting the decision by Facebook to refuse advertisements that advocate for the legalization of marijuana.

The LP had been running a highly successful Facebook ad to express its support of marijuana legalization, but Facebook banned the ad about a week after accepting it.

A sample of the banned LP ad appears below:
http://www.lp.org/files/images/facebook_ad.png

In a July 23 email to the LP, a Facebook rep wrote, "We do not allow ads for marijuana or political ads for the promotion of marijuana."

The LP asserts that its ad is not intended to promote marijuana itself, but rather to take a position on the high-profile political question of legalizing marijuana. The issue is particularly relevant now, as a major marijuana legalization measure (Proposition 19) will be on the ballot in California this November.

Wes Benedict, Executive Director of the LP, commented, "Whether or not the folks at Facebook like marijuana, we think they should end their ridiculous censorship of our ad, which expresses the Libertarian position on a political issue of interest to many people."

Benedict continued, "We recognize Facebook's right to control their content and censor whoever they want. But we're also exercising our First Amendment right to complain about their bad decision, and to alert other consumers to put pressure on them."

On July 15, Facebook notified the LP that it had accepted the ad. Then, on July 22, Facebook revoked its approval, stating that "The image of this ad is either irrelevant or inappropriate."

Recently, the LP learned that Facebook revoked approval of similar ads from other groups, including Just Say Now and the District of Columbia Patients' Cooperative, claiming that their ads violated Facebook's ban on images of "smoking products." The LP notes that Facebook's ad guidelines prohibit "advertisements promoting tobacco products," but that the Libertarian ad does not promote the product itself, and that it is not a tobacco product.

Kyle Hartz, the LP's Development & New Media Assistant, said, "Our ad is targeted to people who have indicated that they are interested in the issue of marijuana legalization. It's bizarre that Facebook won't allow us to advertise to the very people who support what we are advocating."

For more information, or to arrange an interview, call LP Executive Director Wes Benedict at 202-333-0008 ext. 222.

The LP is America's third-largest political party, founded in 1971. The Libertarian Party stands for free markets and civil liberties. You can find more information on the Libertarian Party at our website.

###

RedStripe
08-25-2010, 09:04 AM
This is kind of a form of karma for viewing nominally "private" massive corporations as having the right to do whatever they want in the "free market."

idirtify
08-25-2010, 09:11 AM
So what’s the mechanism for complaining to facebook? How does one “put pressure on them”?

Jack Bauer
08-25-2010, 09:25 AM
This is kind of a form of karma for viewing nominally "private" massive corporations as having the right to do whatever they want in the "free market."

I don't see anything wrong with facebook pulling it off.

Did they violated any contractual obligations?

Sola_Fide
08-25-2010, 09:33 AM
This is kind of a form of karma for viewing nominally "private" massive corporations as having the right to do whatever they want in the "free market."



So the answer for government intervention in business is to have more intervention so the "semi-private corporations" can't "do what they want" anymore?



Why argue for more intervention and aggression? Why not argue for the separation of State and business (since intervention is the problem in the first place)?

KCIndy
08-25-2010, 09:34 AM
Normally, I'm pretty sympathetic toward the Libertarian Party, but in this case, I have to say that they're shooting themselves in the foot.

Instead of crying about Facebook - a private company - enforcing an ad policy they've already had on the books, the LP needs to think outside the box and get their message out some other way.

FrankRep
08-25-2010, 09:39 AM
Normally, I'm pretty sympathetic toward the Libertarian Party, but in this case, I have to say that they're shooting themselves in the foot.

Libertarian Party works hard to stay at a 5% voter base.

KCIndy
08-25-2010, 09:44 AM
Libertarian Party works hard to stay at a 5% voter base.

LOL that's one of the reasons they have my sympathy. I think they mean well, but damn.... c'mon....

Imperial
08-25-2010, 09:51 AM
What is so bad about the LP putting this kind of press release out? For one, it builds bridges to progressives instead of throwing all of the LP's eggs in a conservative basket. Jane Hamsher at Firedoglake gave the issue lots of attention on her website, and that is only good press for the LP.

Also, publicizing this helps to contribute to putting some pressure on Facebook. If enough individuals speak out about a policy of facebook, the company has shown it is willing to compromise (in order to salvage its business, like in the recent privacy debates).

So I don't see why everyone is so critical of the press release.

dannno
08-25-2010, 10:10 AM
I don't see anything wrong with facebook pulling it off.


I do, they are helping maintain a state of tyranny.

Doesn't mean it should be illegal for them to do so, but legal doesn't make 'right'

dannno
08-25-2010, 10:12 AM
Normally, I'm pretty sympathetic toward the Libertarian Party, but in this case, I have to say that they're shooting themselves in the foot.

Instead of crying about Facebook - a private company - enforcing an ad policy they've already had on the books, the LP needs to think outside the box and get their message out some other way.

Or they can use their free speech to call out facebook.. besides, facebook is saying they are promoting mj, when they are promoting it's legalization. They aren't even going against the guidelines.

FrankRep
08-25-2010, 10:13 AM
What is so bad about the LP putting this kind of press release out? For one, it builds bridges to progressives instead of throwing all of the LP's eggs in a conservative basket.

Progressives actually like government, remember?