PDA

View Full Version : SC's Greene Indicted on Felony Obscenity Charge




CaseyJones
08-15-2010, 03:20 PM
YouTube - SC's Greene Indicted on Felony Obscenity Charge (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gELXhBYPsCg&feature=player_embedded#)!
lol

jdmyprez_deo_vindice
08-15-2010, 03:21 PM
YouTube - ALVIN GREENE IS ON THE SCENE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ar09czbfE8o)

anaconda
08-15-2010, 04:32 PM
Obscenity should not be a felony. Should be left to the states.

Knightskye
08-15-2010, 04:38 PM
I'll borrow Kludge's title:
"Haters gonna hate."

RedStripe
08-15-2010, 05:03 PM
Obscenity should not be a felony. Should be left to the states.

States define felonies...

JohnEngland
08-15-2010, 05:07 PM
How did this moron get to be the senate candidate of any party?

Shame on the public for making a mockery of democracy. Billions of people around the world suffer under totalitarian governments and would love the opportunity for vote for their leaders - and these SC voters abuse this duty by electing Greene... Disgraceful.

Though I suppose this is an inevitability of democracy - and also why the popular will of the public must be limited, yet their liberty preserved under the rule of law.

RonPaulFanInGA
08-15-2010, 05:09 PM
Oh no. Now his losing vote percentage in November will fall from 26% to 24%. :rolleyes:

The fact that he's polling at 20% in the most recent poll (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/south_carolina/election_2010_south_carolina_senate) (compared to DeMint's 62%) shows that 20% of South Carolina would vote for a dead opossum if it was on the ballot and had a 'D' next to its name.

RedStripe
08-15-2010, 05:12 PM
How did this moron get to be the senate candidate of any party?

Shame on the public for making a mockery of democracy. Billions of people around the world suffer under totalitarian governments and would love the opportunity for vote for their leaders - and these SC voters abuse this duty by electing Greene... Disgraceful.

Though I suppose this is an inevitability of democracy - and also why the popular will of the public must be limited, yet their liberty preserved under the rule of law.

And how is voting for Green any greater an indictment of the public's respect for the political process, or of the process itself, than their votes for every other candidate out there - even the "intelligent" ones? You know, the ones who are all crooks?

That you would expect people to take our system of voting seriously, in spite of everything the public has come to know of he nature of elected officials, is to hold them to quite a standard!

anaconda
08-15-2010, 05:18 PM
States define felonies...

Sorry for my brain freeze. I was thinking "felony" was a federal crime. I am an idiot. Thanks for clarifying.

Brooklyn Red Leg
08-15-2010, 05:19 PM
This is fucking retarded. The guy may be a total loon, but a felony charge for showing 'pornography' to a female university student? Love the ubiquitous 'teenager' word usage as I bet this girl was 18 or 19. If she didn't like what he said/showed to her, then tell him off or ignore him. The system is made of so much fail its pathetic.

YumYum
08-15-2010, 05:27 PM
And how is voting for Green any greater an indictment of the public's respect for the political process, or of the process itself, than their votes for every other candidate out there - even the "intelligent" ones? You know, the ones who are all crooks?

That you would expect people to take our system of voting seriously, in spite of everything the public has come to know of he nature of elected officials, is to hold them to quite a standard!

Im trying to find out where DeMint stands on giving welfare to Israel. I may have found the answer here.

http://demint.senate.gov/public/_files/2009-01_Steinberg%20DeMint%20QFRs.pdf

BlackTerrel
08-15-2010, 05:42 PM
This is fucking retarded. The guy may be a total loon, but a felony charge for showing 'pornography' to a female university student? Love the ubiquitous 'teenager' word usage as I bet this girl was 18 or 19. If she didn't like what he said/showed to her, then tell him off or ignore him. The system is made of so much fail its pathetic.

This is one of the things that is tough for me to defend - at the same time the punishment seems a bit steep.

A friend of mine works at hooters in a college town and told me about six months ago a guy came in to the restaurant and kept flashing the waitresses a picture of his dick on his iPhone. One of the girls decked him and he left humiliated.

That seems a more appropriate response than clogging up our judicial system.

michaelwise
08-15-2010, 09:02 PM
Alvin had mistakenly opened spam email and a female overlooked what showed up on his computer. Who doesn't get that kind of email? It was an innocent mistake that he is not accountable for. And why does the university allow this kind of smut to come through their system without filtering it out. Must be the degenerate kind of college.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=249593&page=12

YumYum
08-15-2010, 09:05 PM
Alvin had mistakenly opened spam email and a female overlooked what showed up on his computer. Who doesn't get that kind of email? It was an innocent mistake that he is not accountable for. And why does the university allow this kind of smut to come through their system without filtering it out. Must be the degenerate kind of college.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=249593&page=12

Isn't DeMint loved by all the members here on this forum?

michaelwise
08-15-2010, 09:07 PM
Isn't DeMint loved by all the members here on this forum?

It's because they don't care about people who are completely ineffective in congress. DeMint has proven his ineffectiveness. NEXT!

erowe1
08-16-2010, 09:42 AM
Alvin had mistakenly opened spam email and a female overlooked what showed up on his computer. Who doesn't get that kind of email? It was an innocent mistake that he is not accountable for. And why does the university allow this kind of smut to come through their system without filtering it out. Must be the degenerate kind of college.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=249593&page=12

Really? Where'd you hear that?

Please don't tell me you accept that solely on the basis of Greene's own word.

Also, if it was really a picture in an email, then how could the university be expected to block it? If they did use some software to block porn websites (which Notre Dame doesn't even though they have rules against students looking at porn online, so I only assume USC doesn't either, but supposing they did hypothetically), then it still wouldn't prevent someone from being able to open a picture sent to them via email. I'm pretty sure there's no software that can tell if any given picture attached to an email is a pornographic one.