Did Democrats violate the copyright?

[BamaFanNKy]

http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs123.ash2/39497_1319963852153_1622493538_30726483_3409258_n. jpg


http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs217.snc4/39205_1319963932155_1622493538_30726484_4947092_n. jpg

[thomas-in-ky]

Someone put a lot of effort into that... and that's the best they can do? Conway is Toast.

[MelissaWV]

Someone put a lot of effort into that... and that's the best they can do? Conway is Toast.

Oh I found it witty, actually... even if (like most campaign crap) it's not to be taken seriously. How are they distributing this? Most people will think it's a mailer from the Waffle House and just pitch it; it has WAY too much printed on it for everyone to read.

[thomas-in-ky]

it has WAY too much printed on it for everyone to read.

definitely. they were handing them out at the Fancy Farm political event.

[BamaFanNKy]

They also printed tshirts.

It seems to be a copyright infringement. Or abuse of trademark.

[noxagol]

So what if they broke copyright, copyright is dumb to begin with. Why, if they obeyed the law they might not have wasted their time with this crap and used it for something better for themselves!

[BamaFanNKy]

So what if they broke copyright, copyright is dumb to begin with. Why, if they obeyed the law they might not have wasted their time with this crap and used it for something better for themselves!

Who do you think makes those laws. It's called Hypocrisy.

[Razmear]

It's not a copyright violation but is trademark infringement. Waffle House has legit grounds to sue for damages if they did not authorize the use of their trademark.

[BamaFanNKy]

It's not a copyright violation but is trademark infringement. Waffle House has legit grounds to sue for damages if they did not authorize the use of their trademark.

Thanks for clarification.