Fox News: Wikileaks HATES The Military

[Matt Collins]

YouTube - Wikileaks' Crusade Against the U.S. Military (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozYq2a7lrBE&feature=player_embedded#)!

[Kotin]

:rolleyes:



I expect as much from these morons.

[awake]

Yes, I too hate armed men who could shoot me deader than a hammer for simply walking my goat down the road.

[Stary Hickory]

Yes, I too hate armed men who could shoot me deader than a hammer for simply walking my goat down the road.

Wild generalizations for the loss. I am glad the info is coming out, the people deserve to know what is happening there. They are paying for it and losing their loved ones in war.

But I do not like it when people characterize the entire military in such a fashion. There are good folk in the military and there are sleaze bags too. Just like in everyday life.

[Imaginos]

CNN sucks.
But Fox News swallows.

[Kotin]

CNN sucks.
But Fox News swallows.

;):D

[speciallyblend]

Fox News HATES FREEDOM,LIBERTY and the US CONSTITUTION!!!!! F'FOX

[Matt Collins]

;):D
And MSNBC blows? ;):p

[michaelwise]

All MSM news agencies are in the business of enforcing THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION.

It would be a major blow th their agenda if their illegal immigration agenda was stopped.

Un-restricted diversity is the destroyer of culture and the facilitator of control. I believe it is outlined in THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm

http://theuniversalseduction.com/art...rmed-authentic


"The Protocols identify the moving force of the New World Order with a powerful group of extremely chauvinist, manipulative and domination-obsessed Jewish leaders. The leaders, according to the Protocols, despise ordinary community members; they utilise and support anti-Semitism as the means to keep their "lesser brethren", innocent ordinary folk of Jewish origin, in thrall to their rule. The leaders are described as pathological goy haters, bent on destroying culture and traditions of other nations while preserving their own. Their goal is to create world government and rule the homogenised and globalised world."

"- In a mono-ethnic society, the Jews as the only foreign body do stick out and attract attention, while in multicultural society they are hardly seen. For this purpose, the Jews support immigration from non-European countries, as their presence would remove the stamp of Jewish exclusiveness. "

1389) The endgame of multiculturalism for Marxian Jews is racial mongrelization of whites, to destroy white Western civilization and build worldwide socialism/communism.

http://www.rense.com/general32/elders.htm

[Todd]

"The U.S doesn't send suicide bombers into crowded restaurants or fly planes into buildings"


Yeah we don't fly planes into buildings....just accidentally fire cruise missiles into weddings and Depleted uranium shells that affect the next generation of unborn...and about 300 more acts accidental or not exposed in the Wiki documents.

[awake]

Wild generalizations for the loss. I am glad the info is coming out, the people deserve to know what is happening there. They are paying for it and losing their loved ones in war.

But I do not like it when people characterize the entire military in such a fashion. There are good folk in the military and there are sleaze bags too. Just like in everyday life.

The good people are still ordered to shoot everyone in sight for an IED that was planted by a man who isn't there to watch. That's not good. There are good people caught up in a looting riot- they go along.

The very worst thing I find about "military" worship, as in any form of institutional worship, is that many over look the the fact that good men can be so easily cooped for bad purposes. Invasion and occupation is Orwellian self defense.

There is always the 'good people' doing bad things.

[heavenlyboy34]

The good people are still ordered to shoot everyone in sight for an IED that was planted by a man who isn't there to watch. That's not good. There are good people caught up in a looting riot- they go along.

The very worst thing I find about "military" worship, as in any form of institutional worship, is that many over look the the fact that good men can be so easily cooped for bad purposes. Invasion and occupation is Orwellian self defense.

There is always the 'good people' doing bad things.


excellent point, sir! :cool:

[Fredom101]

YouTube - Wikileaks' Crusade Against the U.S. Military (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozYq2a7lrBE&feature=player_embedded#)!

So what? What's wrong with hating the military? They are a group that gets paid via stolen money to kill people. If you're going to hate something, the U.S. military should probably be at the top of the list.

[puppetmaster]

Wild generalizations for the loss. I am glad the info is coming out, the people deserve to know what is happening there. They are paying for it and losing their loved ones in war.

But I do not like it when people characterize the entire military in such a fashion. There are good folk in the military and there are sleaze bags too. Just like in everyday life.

yes but they are wearing my uniform and they all are representing me.....I am disgusted with them, all of them.

[andrewh817]

But I do not like it when people characterize the entire military in such a fashion. There are good folk in the military and there are sleaze bags too. Just like in everyday life.

Well I agree that if the person in the military has never had the reality of what they're doing explained to them, then I can't pass moral judgment on them. But once it has been explained, and the person doesn't do anything about it, that's when you can call them evil.

[t0rnado]

Why the hell should we respect the military? They don't fight for anyone's freedoms. They murder innocent people and are drones without a moral compass who just follow orders.

[PreDeadMan]

I certainly don't want my money stolen from me to fund any military. Let me voluntarily CHOOSE where i want my treasures to go!

[charrob]

...just curious... how much do our congresspeople know? RonPaul mentioned in a recent speech that he found out we had soldiers in Pakistan because it was in the Wall Street Journal, or somesuch.


Are our congresspeople given all classified military documents, like the files in the wikileaks, so they can make proper judgements about the wars we're involved in?

If not, why not?

[Kludge]

"Red Eye" is a satire infotainment show... They´re purposefully over-the-top and disingenuous. The title of this thread is misleading.

[Matt Collins]

"Red Eye" is a satire infotainment show... They´re purposefully over-the-top and disingenuous. The title of this thread is misleading.
I've never sat through any of it (it was too awful for me to suffer through) but I thought Gutfield was a bit more of a libertarian than this.

[Kludge]

I've never sat through any of it (it was too awful for me to suffer through) but I thought Gutfield was a bit more of a libertarian than this.

He´s just being a jackass on national TV. It´s his job.

[Depressed Liberator]

I've never sat through any of it (it was too awful for me to suffer through) but I thought Gutfield was a bit more of a libertarian than this.

No one on there is really that libertarian, but the pretty boy and the guy who correct them are more libertarian then Gutfield.

[mediahasyou]

But I do not like it when people characterize the entire military in such a fashion. There are good folk in the military and there are sleaze bags too. Just like in everyday life.

the people within may be good people. however, the organization deserves to be hated for making murder acceptable.

[heavenlyboy34]

the people within may be good people. however, the organization deserves to be hated for making murder acceptable.

Indeed.

New military slogan: "Killing innocent people for fun and profit". :(:p

[Endgame]

Word is Assange is on Freedom Watch this weekend. Judge Nap is going to have to be careful with this one.

[BlackTerrel]

I have not been following this case enough to make an informed opinion.

Does the information released by Wikileaks put our people in greater danger by either:

1. Creating more enemies

or

2. Giving classified information about troop location, movement, strategy etc...

If either of those I would have a big problem with them. While I disagree with many of our actions those are still our people and I have many friends and family members currently in war zones that I am very worried about.

[charrob]

I have not been following this case enough to make an informed opinion.

Does the information released by Wikileaks put our people in greater danger by either:

1. Creating more enemies

or

2. Giving classified information about troop location, movement, strategy etc...

If either of those I would have a big problem with them. While I disagree with many of our actions those are still our people and I have many friends and family members currently in war zones that I am very worried about.

As far as i know, #1 is 'no'. For number 2, the material is 7 months old; the source of the leaks made clear that about 76,000 documents could be released now and about 15,000 more documents must wait before being disclosed so those over there are not endangered. Assange is just holding onto the 15,000 documents for now.

[BlackTerrel]

As far as i know, #1 is 'no'. For number 2, the material is 7 months old; the source of the leaks made clear that about 76,000 documents could be released now and about 15,000 more documents must wait before being disclosed so those over there are not endangered. Assange is just holding onto the 15,000 documents for now.

Ok that is a big difference.

So he is specifically holding on to them because

1. He realizes that if he releases them he is putting American lives at risk?

2. He does not want to put American lives at risk and is specifically taking steps to prevent that?

If the general concensus of both of these is yes that changes my opinion of this whole situation a great deal.