PDA

View Full Version : Pentagon workers tied to child porn...




specsaregood
07-23-2010, 09:38 PM
./

dannno
07-23-2010, 09:42 PM
What is their definition of "child porn" ??

I'll bet if they gave us the # of personell, and the % accessing 16, 17 yr olds vs 14 and 15 yr olds vs under 14, i imagine people wouldn't be as shocked..

specsaregood
07-23-2010, 09:50 PM
./

sevin
07-23-2010, 09:52 PM
What is their definition of "child porn" ??

I'll bet if they gave us the # of personell, and the % accessing 16, 17 yr olds vs 14 and 15 yr olds vs under 14, i imagine people wouldn't be as shocked..

That may be, but it's just as wrong.

paulpwns
07-23-2010, 10:01 PM
I am sure a decent amount of our irrational posters here support keeping child porn legal.

Whats the big deal if some elected officials want the FREEDOM to view underage children having sex? Next think you know, they will ban all free media!

Child porn laws are unconstitutional . It's government oppression. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Kregisen
07-23-2010, 10:10 PM
I am sure a decent amount of our irrational posters here support keeping child porn legal.

Whats the big deal if some elected officials want the FREEDOM to view underage children having sex? Next think you know, they will ban all free media!

Child porn laws are unconstitutional . It's government oppression. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Few here believe children should have the same rights as adults.

18 is obviously just an arbitrary number, but whatever age they decide should be the age where people are legally old enough to make their own choices and can give their own consent.

paulpwns
07-23-2010, 10:12 PM
Few here believe children should have the same rights as adults.

18 is obviously just an arbitrary number, but whatever age they decide should be the age where people are legally old enough to make their own choices and can give their own consent.

Sorry you are right. Children have rights. It's only animals that have zero rights. After all aren't living breathing animals just property? You know the same as a car?

Kregisen
07-23-2010, 10:19 PM
Sorry you are right. Children have rights. It's only animals that have zero rights. After all aren't living breathing animals just property? You know the same as a car?

As soon as you tell me where I mentioned animals I'll deliver your child porn straight to your door....for free.

dannno
07-23-2010, 10:21 PM
That may be, but it's just as wrong.

Bullshit.

You are never, ever, ever, ever going to convince me or most rational people than a 17 year old involved in porn is just as bad as an 8 year old.

tangent4ronpaul
07-23-2010, 11:59 PM
I am sure a decent amount of our irrational posters here support keeping child porn legal.

Whats the big deal if some elected officials want the FREEDOM to view underage children having sex? Next think you know, they will ban all free media!

Child porn laws are unconstitutional . It's government oppression. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Intel professionals are NOT elected!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Show me the victim? As Wikileaks has documented, some of these girls are happy participants. Also documented, a lot (The vast majority of non-entrapment sites)) of this is completely legal pics of overage teens that look young.

Again, who has been victimized? Even if they are 16? The diff between a willing participant and an unwilling one is BLATANTLY obvious,,,

-t

j6p
07-24-2010, 06:14 AM
The laws dont apply to our overlords, only the peons. The age of consent in Japan is 13, is that child porn?

tangent4ronpaul
07-24-2010, 07:17 AM
The laws dont apply to our overlords, only the peons. The age of consent in Japan is 13, is that child porn?

Age of consent and age you can photograph yourself nude or having sex are not the same. In this state, the former is 16 and the latter 18. Yeah, I know - it's total BS

I re-read the OP and there are a bunch of things in there, I simply do not believe...

The ppl involved held high level security clearances... - and they passed the lifestyle polly how? That says tons about our clearance procedures.

they were STUPID enough to access such material over a DoD network - don't they know that those things are monitored? - I mean it only says so in big bold letters on the start page of every DoD site you access.

There are pay kiddy porn sites??? - news to me. In everything I've read on the topic I've never seen mention of a "pay" KP site - outside of the Keez site that was years ago and ppl were swept up based on payment records.

These "Intelligence professionals" were STUPID enough to provide billing info to such a site that would lead directly back to them... uh, hu... Riiiiiggghhhtttt!!!!!!!

Geeze, these are the ppl that are suposidly "protecting us" from the teeeaaarrooorriiissttssss - I feel safer already! :rolleyes:

This story sounds like total BS....

-t

Meatwasp
07-24-2010, 07:43 AM
Bullshit.

You are never, ever, ever, ever going to convince me or most rational people than a 17 year old involved in porn is just as bad as an 8 year old.

I very very much doubt they were 18 year olds. It is still sickening wrong and you know it.

Meatwasp
07-24-2010, 07:45 AM
I am sure a decent amount of our irrational posters here support keeping child porn legal.

Whats the big deal if some elected officials want the FREEDOM to view underage children having sex? Next think you know, they will ban all free media!

Child porn laws are unconstitutional . It's government oppression. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

B.S>