PDA

View Full Version : Where we got logic from




Uncle Emanuel Watkins
07-21-2010, 09:53 AM
The People’s Civil Purpose;
In the Defense of Our Founding Fathers

Logic Developed From Our Muslim Heritage

by Uncle Emanuel Watkins

In order to deceive the subordinates back to the position of kneeling and wearing veils, one should sell them on the notion of atheism. After dividing their ranks, then one should further sell them on the use of rational logic. With it being quite convenient, conversion to the Muslim religion is a proficient way to sell them on a whole package deal.
Why don't we all know this? First off, the fleeing-elite are those who use their political power to avoid having their positions clearly defined in society, thus giving their positions an unfair economical advantage over others – with these being workers of inequity. Meanwhile, as literary history is easy to understand because it is a downhill process focusing on the people’s shame, the use of philosophy pains to develop an uphill process doing just the opposite. So, is it any wonder that professors have become modern sophists by deceiving their students in the universities?
What is not clear to us today and should be is how we inherited the use of logic from Islam and how Western Europe was not privy to Aristotle’s use of rational thought until the thirteenth century. This eventuality happened because of contact between Western Europe and the Arab Empire during the Holy Wars, but most specifically because of two Aristotelean philosophers living in the Arab conquered portion of southern Spain. While the teaching of platonic mathematics played the part of science in Western Europe, it was the Arabs who dug up Aristotle and redeveloped his more rational theories. Understand, Aristotle didn’t believe that knowing math was necessary in knowing science, or what would eventually become known as natural philosophy, while Plato felt just the opposite was true.
In returning the people back to tyranny and to the forfeiting of their social contract with their government, our government will have to deceive us out of our natural rights. One takes away natural rights by stripping the people of their administrative functions; likewise, one takes away administrative funtions by establishing legal precedence, with this being the tradition of wearing a veil over the face. The significance of the face is it represents authority. A Muslim woman never truly marries if she is wearing a veil because she isn’t expressing her face of authority. So, ironically, a Muslim woman is the one truly commiting adultery. Just consider the saying “to lose ones face?” Meanwhile, if one marries in the name of Christ, one shares in an Authority with this being a mystery.
As “knowing how to rationally distract the subordinates” is of importance to tyranny, “knowing how to keep ones peace by becoming envisioned” should be most important to the people. As our Founding Fathers taught us how to better keep our peace by clearly depicting and defining what is a tyranny, we can become even better envisioned by focusing our attentions on the inverse between that of the high king on his throne and that of the lowly prostitute trespassing on his streets.
The Glory of Christ is how He came to bring these two entities together to share in a marriage of authority. As the least bride amongst us has a burden within her she needs to express, (as we Americans know this to be self evident and unalienable in our collective conscience to be the Truth), the greatest husband amongst us should serve her by administrating, legislating, and judging as little as possible at the dinner table.
This is copyrighted material. Any political forum or entity supporting the spirit of Ron Paul has the permission of Uncle Emanuel Watkins to reprint this material. Any individual because of the Freedom of the Press also has that right. However, because they no longer represent the people and are, in fact, in opposition to their Civil Purpose, no commercial media or any individuals working for such have that right.

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
07-21-2010, 04:47 PM
The People’s Civil Purpose;
In the Defense of Our Founding Fathers

Logic Developed From Our Muslim Heritage

by Uncle Emanuel Watkins

In order to deceive the subordinates back to the position of kneeling and wearing veils, one should sell them on the notion of atheism. After dividing their ranks, then one should further sell them on the use of rational logic. With it being quite convenient, conversion to the Muslim religion is a proficient way to sell them on a whole package deal.
Why don't we all know this? First off, the fleeing-elite are those who use their political power to avoid having their positions clearly defined in society, thus giving their positions an unfair economical advantage over others – with these being workers of inequity. Meanwhile, as literary history is easy to understand because it is a downhill process focusing on the people’s shame, the use of philosophy pains to develop an uphill process doing just the opposite. So, is it any wonder that professors have become modern sophists by deceiving their students in the universities?
What is not clear to us today and should be is how we inherited the use of logic from Islam and how Western Europe was not privy to Aristotle’s use of rational thought until the thirteenth century. This eventuality happened because of contact between Western Europe and the Arab Empire during the Holy Wars, but most specifically because of two Aristotelean philosophers living in the Arab conquered portion of southern Spain. While the teaching of platonic mathematics played the part of science in Western Europe, it was the Arabs who dug up Aristotle and redeveloped his more rational theories. Understand, Aristotle didn’t believe that knowing math was necessary in knowing science, or what would eventually become known as natural philosophy, while Plato felt just the opposite was true.
In returning the people back to tyranny and to the forfeiting of their social contract with their government, our government will have to deceive us out of our natural rights. One takes away natural rights by stripping the people of their administrative functions; likewise, one takes away administrative funtions by establishing legal precedence, with this being the tradition of wearing a veil over the face. The significance of the face is it represents authority. A Muslim woman never truly marries if she is wearing a veil because she isn’t expressing her face of authority. So, ironically, a Muslim woman is the one truly commiting adultery. Just consider the saying “to lose ones face?” Meanwhile, if one marries in the name of Christ, one shares in an Authority with this being a mystery.
As “knowing how to rationally distract the subordinates” is of importance to tyranny, “knowing how to keep ones peace by becoming envisioned” should be most important to the people. As our Founding Fathers taught us how to better keep our peace by clearly depicting and defining what is a tyranny, we can become even better envisioned by focusing our attentions on the inverse between that of the high king on his throne and that of the lowly prostitute trespassing on his streets.
The Glory of Christ is how He came to bring these two entities together to share in a marriage of authority. As the least bride amongst us has a burden within her she needs to express, (as we Americans know this to be self evident and unalienable in our collective conscience to be the Truth), the greatest husband amongst us should serve her by administrating, legislating, and judging as little as possible at the dinner table.
This is copyrighted material. Any political forum or entity supporting the spirit of Ron Paul has the permission of Uncle Emanuel Watkins to reprint this material. Any individual because of the Freedom of the Press also has that right. However, because they no longer represent the people and are, in fact, in opposition to their Civil Purpose, no commercial media or any individuals working for such have that right.
Revise and Bump

heavenlyboy34
07-21-2010, 05:12 PM
How do you expect to enforce a "social contract" when noone currently living agreed to it? It's sophistry, I say!

1000-points-of-fright
07-21-2010, 06:01 PM
Where we got logic from? Hopefully not the same place we got grammar from.


PS: What, no prostitutes?

tnvoter
07-21-2010, 06:20 PM
Spock?

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
07-22-2010, 11:45 AM
How do you expect to enforce a "social contract" when noone currently living agreed to it? It's sophistry, I say!

Working to empower tyranny is the notion that desperate measures call for desperate measures. This is a fallacy as the truth is always just the opposite: as great benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations. In other words, what we need for ourselves to live rich lives is already set in place being inherited from our ancestors.
The social contract, or the idea of good, positive government, started with Socrates / Plato. As a Christian, I am an American because Jesus blessed the multitude of nations.
The argument against tradition is different from arguing against our ancestors.
If I accuse you falsely of being a whore to your face, then my big lie would be apparent without the long tradition of whoring existing to back that up. This is the significance of legal precedence.
It is the Truth that sets us free as it was always the Truth that set us free. I believe all whores have this Truth within their collective souls or Soul which is their American Civil Purpose. This Formal Culture is unalienable, as in bipartisan, and supercedes all legal precedence, every past tradition, and every future event yet to occur.

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
07-22-2010, 12:02 PM
Where we got logic from? Hopefully not the same place we got grammar from.


PS: What, no prostitutes?

Because of the predatory natures of our minds, we would rather skip down the hill always focusing on the high position of the majestic king. In comparison, bringing ourselves to consider the lowly prostitute as his inversion, or his perversion, is an uphill process and painful.
Indeed, the use of logic, the rational method of tyranny, does teach us to know, but it also aggitates the kinds of discussions that keep us ragged out by dividing our ranks. We need more than just to know, we need to know enough to keep our peace in silence. As I've often said in here, the prostitute knows she only has a prayer as there does not exist a single soul out there caring enough to complain to.
This is how the rational process works. The king never has to complain as he has all his needs taken care of; meanwhile, the prostitute only has a prayer.

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
07-22-2010, 12:30 PM
Spock?

The purpose of writing this writ was to point out the earth society most resembling that of the logical Vulcan one. It was the nation of Islam that redeveloped the rational processes of Aristotle, not Western Europe. The significance? Well, these once logical Muslims aren't just backwards when compared to the rest of the once illogical world that surrounds them, but they are menacing.
Logic is not a friend of the people. This is why I make the claim that we need to be further envisioned. We are envisioned and empowered when we pain to see the whole inversion between that of the high king ordained to sit on his throne as the owner of all things and that of the low, prostitute condemned to trespass on his property as a worthless soul.