PDA

View Full Version : RNC confirms Michael Steele will remain chairman




bobbyw24
07-07-2010, 11:03 AM
Despite numerous calls for his resignation over comments made criticizing the war effort in Afghanistan, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele will not step down, RNC spokesman Doug Heye confirmed Tuesday.

Steele will stay on as the head of the committee amid criticism from Senate Republicans who took to the airwaves over the weekend to condemn his comments that the war in Afghanistan could not be won. Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Jim DeMint and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina appeared on the Sunday talk shows to discuss the chairman’s fate as leader of the Republican Party.

Appearing on ABC’s This Week on a live feed from Kabul, McCain called Steele’s comments “wildly inaccurate” but stopped short of saying he should resign.

“[Steele] is going to have to assess as to whether he can still lead the Republican Party as chairman of the Republican National Committee and make an appropriate decision,” McCain said.

While traveling with McCain in Afghanistan, Graham called Steele’s remarks an “uninformed, unnecessary, unwise, untimely comment” during an interview with Face the Nation on CBS.

“This is not President Obama’s war; this is America’s war,” he said.

On Fox News Sunday, DeMint echoed Graham’s comments about the war not being the sole responsibility of President Obama, and said Steele must apologize and get back to focusing on his job: getting Republicans elected.

“He needs to refocus on electing candidates who can stop this rampage of spending and debt in Washington — whether or not he resigns is up to other people than me, but I need to see him focus on this November election,” he said.

Although a number of influential conservatives have called for the chairman to step down, including

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/07/rnc-confirms-michael-steele-will-remain-chairman/#ixzz0t17l0WLE

jmdrake
07-07-2010, 11:07 AM
-1776 for Jim Demint, but I'm not surprised. Good to see they weren't able to shake Steele out over this. But I hope more people will speak up and this time don't back down.

specsaregood
07-07-2010, 11:13 AM
Dr. Paul picked the winning horse.

Bruno
07-07-2010, 11:32 AM
Dr. Paul picked the winning horse.

this :)

Matt Collins
07-07-2010, 11:39 AM
Dr. Paul picked the winning horse.
YouTube - Ron Paul CPAC 2010 and his new fan Michael Steele (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwl-XfTd3CI&feature=player_embedded)

http://photos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash1/hs300.ash1/22777_559869166382_84101326_32520469_135283_n.jpg

http://i49.tinypic.com/xq9d1u.jpg

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_AUfix9uS5lU/S4HrgxfGQ8I/AAAAAAAAAF8/Tug_YgwYepY/s576/IMG_0776.JPG

itshappening
07-07-2010, 11:44 AM
This is why Sen. Rand Paul is important, to knock the likes of McCain and Graham off the air

I also think Mike Lee is very promising but a Sen. Paul will get a lot of attention and will be able to stick up for our principles. Even DeMint will be brushed aside when he gets there .

Make sure you support him >>>

Aratus
07-07-2010, 12:06 PM
at least michael steele sometimes listens to several of the g.o.p
factions who have a gravitas insted of totally playing favorites...

Romulus
07-07-2010, 12:40 PM
Big FAIL on DeMints part.

Props to Paul... and sort of to Steele.. not for backtracking but for NOT stepping down.

Brown Sapper
07-07-2010, 12:58 PM
While traveling with McCain in Afghanistan, Graham called Steele’s remarks an “uninformed, unnecessary, unwise, untimely comment” during an interview with Face the Nation on CBS.

Didn't McCain get corrected by Graham during the primaries about calling insurgents terrorists during the primaries? All of a sudden he an expert now. Give me a break.

specsaregood
07-07-2010, 01:01 PM
Big FAIL on DeMints part.

Indeed. He had his chance to be a leader moving the republican party back to the moral and fiscally sane path. He opted to stay on the losing side. I look forward to a real leader stepping up the challenge.

ChaosControl
07-07-2010, 01:01 PM
Boo DeMint. He still hasn't learned to oppose this interventionist nonsense.

Bruno
07-07-2010, 01:02 PM
Didn't McCain get corrected by Graham during the primaries about calling insurgents terrorists during the primaries? All of a sudden he an expert now. Give me a break.

is that what you are referring to?

YouTube - McCain's Foreign Policy Gaffe (CBS News) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6GBdyws5YU)

AGRP
07-07-2010, 01:11 PM
A commander-in-chief is the commander of a nation's military forces or significant element of those forces. In the latter case, the force element may be defined as those forces within a particular region or those forces which are associated by function. As a practical term it refers to the military competencies that reside in a nation-state's executive, head of state or government. Often, a given country's commander-in-chief need not be or have been a commissioned officer or even a veteran, and it is by this legal statute that civilian control of the military is realized in states where it is constitutionally required.

Brown Sapper
07-07-2010, 01:21 PM
Yup thats the one. He lost all credibility with me when he couldn't even differ between the types of enemies that we are engaged in.