PDA

View Full Version : Alaska Firearms Freedom Act Takes Effect Today




FrankRep
07-02-2010, 06:54 AM
Alaska Firearms Freedom Act Takes Effect Today (http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/07/alaska-firearms-freedom-act-takes-effect-today/)


Tenth Amendment Center
July 1st, 2010


From the “Way up North (http://mooseintheyard.blogspot.com/2010/07/alaska-firearms-freedom-act-takes.html)” blog:



The local NBC affiliate is all wee-wee’d up this morning, having suddenly discovered that Gov. Sean Parnell signed “the Firearms Freedom Act,” which exempts firearms, accessories and ammunition made and kept in state from federal gun regulations. The firearms in question also must have “Made in Alaska” stamped on them.

That law goes into effect today; the talking heads blathered something-or-other about Montana, but neglected to mention Tennessee having done the same thing, with the same result: letters from the BATFE threatening dire results if gun dealers attempt to follow state law.


Alaska now joins Montana, Tennessee, Utah, Wyoming, South Dakota, Idaho, and Arizona as the eighth state to have passed the act into law.

The United States Constitution gives Congress the authority to regulate Interstate Commerce between the states and 18 USC 922 makes it unlawful for any person not licensed as a manufacturer or dealer in firearms to engage in the business of manufacturing or dealing in firearms. Collectively, the Interstate Commerce Clause and 18 USC 922 are used by the federal goverenment as a means to regulate firearms.

The Alaska Firearms Freedom Act addresses this by exempting firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition manufactured and retained in the state from all federal firearm control laws including registration, as firearms that meet these criteria cannot be regulated by the federal government because they have not traveled in interstate commerce.

In a prepared statement, the Act’s sponsor, Representative Mike Kelly said: “The Alaska Firearms Freedom Act frees Alaskans from overly-bureaucratic and restrictive federal firearm regulation, and allows our state to assume the responsibility for regulation. The Interstate Commerce Clause is used by the federal government to regulate firearms that cross state borders. The Alaska Firearms Freedom Act makes it clear that Alaskans will be responsible for firearms that are made in Alaska, for use in Alaska, and have ‘Made in Alaska’ stamped on them.”

The principle behind such legislation is nullification, which has a long history in the American tradition. When a state ‘nullifies’ a federal law, it is proclaiming that the law in question is void and inoperative, or ‘non-effective,’ within the boundaries of that state; or, in other words, not a law as far as the state is concerned. Implied in such legislation is that the state apparatus will enforce the act against all violations – in order to protect the liberty of the state’s citizens.

CLICK HERE (http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/talkingpoints/TAC-Talking-Points-Firearms-Freedom-Act.pdf) to view the Tenth Amendment Center’s printable Firearms Freedom Act Brochure (pdf)


SOURCE:
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/07/alaska-firearms-freedom-act-takes-effect-today/

FrankRep
07-02-2010, 06:55 AM
Email your State Reps about the Firearms Freedom Act!


Find your State and Click:

Alabama (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21268&SiteID=-1) HB48;
Colorado (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21288&SiteID=-1) SB 10-092;
Florida (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21289&SiteID=-1) HB 21 out of committee, SB 98 in committee;
Indiana (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21295&SiteID=-1) Senate Bill 0200, Senate Bill 0276, Senate Bill 0416;
Kansas (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21298&SiteID=-1) HB 2620;
Kentucky (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21299&SiteID=-1) HB 87 (BR348);
Michigan (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21301&SiteID=-1) House Bill 5232;
Minnesota (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21302&SiteID=-1) HF 2376 stalled, SF 2140 also stalled;
Missouri (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21304&SiteID=-1) HB 1230;
New Hampshire (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21305&SiteID=-1) HB1285; HB 1433;
Ohio (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21306&SiteID=-1) House Bill 315;
Pennsylvania (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21308&SiteID=-1) HB 1988 stalled in committee;
South Carolina (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21309&SiteID=-1) S. 794 stalled in committee;
Texas (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21310&SiteID=-1) (Not in Session)
Washington (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21311&SiteID=-1) HB 2709; and
West Virginia (http://www.votervoice.net/Groups/JBS/Advocacy/?IssueID=21313&SiteID=-1) SB 555.



http://www.thenewamerican.com/images/stories/US_12-2009/2605-coverstory.jpg

State vs. Federal: The Nullification Movement
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/constitution/2957-state-vs-federal-the-nullification-movement

Nullification in a Nutshell
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/history/american/2971-nullification-in-a-nutshell

Pericles
07-02-2010, 09:59 AM
Take Texas off your list - the legislature is not in session, and the bill will have to be filed again during the next session.

FrankRep
07-02-2010, 11:35 AM
Take Texas off your list - the legislature is not in session, and the bill will have to be filed again during the next session.

Do they check emails while not in session?

It may inspire a Rep to file it because it's so popular with the voters.

Pericles
07-02-2010, 12:04 PM
Do they check emails while not in session?

It may inspire a Rep to file it because it's so popular with the voters.

The sponsor is big in the Patrick Henry caucus - until the legislature is back in session (and won't be until early next year), there is nothing to be done.

Texas only allows its Congress to meet 120 days every two years because we have enough laws already, and don't need any more.

Toureg89
07-02-2010, 02:46 PM
should take Fl. off your list as well...that bill is dead in the water as far as i know.

FrankRep
07-02-2010, 03:13 PM
should take Fl. off your list as well...that bill is dead in the water as far as i know.

Hammer them with more Emails and Calls. :)

american.swan
07-02-2010, 06:59 PM
http://www.ted.com/talks/omar_ahmad_political_change_with_pen_and_paper.htm l