PDA

View Full Version : To Enforce or Not to Enforce




Uncle Emanuel Watkins
06-28-2010, 11:59 AM
The People’s Civil Purpose;
In the Defense of Our Founding Fathers

Not enforcing the law is not against the law

When it becomes not against the law to not enforce the law, then those sworn to uphold the law will no longer enforce it. This will open the door to far more corruption, bribery, and scandals. This clearly demonstrates how tyranny cannot reprove itself. More precise, one can never rely on tyranny to rebuke itself. So, we should not waste our precious time with it. The only real solution is to legislate, to administrate, and to judge as little as possible.
Today, the official business of “necessary tyranny” has gotten so overheated that illegals have more rights than legal citizens. As absurd as it might sound, a police officer can ask a legal citizen living homeless in a sanctioned “Ambassador” city for his or her identification while that same officer cannot ask a legal homeless, an illegal, for his or her’s. An illegal alien cannot legally obtain automobile insurance. An illegal alien does not have to pay taxes. An illegal alien cannot be charged for medical treatment as they are not legally obligated to pay for it.
Yet, as police officers obey such absurd enforcement policies, they are endangering their own livelihoods. As absurd as events have become, we haven’t seen the worst of it. For the day when our nation’s governments employ illegals to enforce our laws is fast approaching. As illegals are being hired to replace legal citizens in private jobs, so will it benefit tyranny to hire such illegals to fill public jobs. How long will it be before the Federal government adopts the practice of indentured servitude to fill the ranks of its armed forces granting legal status to illegals who join it and serve?
As police officers are endangering their own livelihoods by obeying such absurd enforcement policies, the day is quickly approaching when illegals will be deployed to vote illegally. Just consider that illegals today can get away with anything short of murder and, even if they are charged with a crime, then the life they live in their short stay in prison, costing tax payers $35,000 to $50,000 a year, will be better than the life they would be living back in Mexico. So, what is there to keep illegals from voting illegally? Think about it. An illegal could make a good living voting over and over to keep a political party in office indefinitely. Are they already being employed to do this? How can we possibly enforce this? The only way is to seal our borders.
We need to wake up. We need to live in the real world. We need to spend less time thinking in our air conditioned offices. We have to learn to start thinking like that little prostitute thinks. She knows only too well how absurd the world can become when its cruel business becomes overheated, when it is no longer against the law not enforcing the law.
Indeed, police officers today need to either A) enforce the law on illegals or B) quit enforcing the law on legal citizens. After reestablishing our laws, rules and regulations, we then need to protect the integrity of our voting system by sealing off our borders. Most important, though, we need to return to our Founders desire to legislate, administrate, and judge as little as possible.
This is copyrighted material. Any political forum or organization representing the spirit of Ron Paul has permission to reprint it. Likewise, because of Freedom of the Press, any individual has the right to reprint it. However, no commercial media or any individual working for such a business, because they no longer represent the people, have that right.

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
06-29-2010, 12:02 AM
The People’s Civil Purpose;
In the Defense of Our Founding Fathers

Not enforcing the law is not against the law

When it becomes not against the law to not enforce the law, then those sworn to uphold the law will no longer enforce it. This will open the door to far more corruption, bribery, and scandals. This clearly demonstrates how tyranny cannot reprove itself. More precise, one can never rely on tyranny to rebuke itself. So, we should not waste our precious time with it. The only real solution is to legislate, to administrate, and to judge as little as possible.
Today, the official business of “necessary tyranny” has gotten so overheated that illegals have more rights than legal citizens. As absurd as it might sound, a police officer can ask a legal citizen living homeless in a sanctioned “Ambassador” city for his or her identification while that same officer cannot ask a legal homeless, an illegal, for his or her’s. An illegal alien cannot legally obtain automobile insurance. An illegal alien does not have to pay taxes. An illegal alien cannot be charged for medical treatment as they are not legally obligated to pay for it.
Yet, as police officers obey such absurd enforcement policies, they are endangering their own livelihoods. As absurd as events have become, we haven’t seen the worst of it. For the day when our nation’s governments employ illegals to enforce our laws is fast approaching. As illegals are being hired to replace legal citizens in private jobs, so will it benefit tyranny to hire such illegals to fill public jobs. How long will it be before the Federal government adopts the practice of indentured servitude to fill the ranks of its armed forces granting legal status to illegals who join it and serve?
As police officers are endangering their own livelihoods by obeying such absurd enforcement policies, the day is quickly approaching when illegals will be deployed to vote illegally. Just consider that illegals today can get away with anything short of murder and, even if they are charged with a crime, then the life they live in their short stay in prison, costing tax payers $35,000 to $50,000 a year, will be better than the life they would be living back in Mexico. So, what is there to keep illegals from voting illegally? Think about it. An illegal could make a good living voting over and over to keep a political party in office indefinitely. Are they already being employed to do this? How can we possibly enforce this? The only way is to seal our borders.
We need to wake up. We need to live in the real world. We need to spend less time thinking in our air conditioned offices. We have to learn to start thinking like that little prostitute thinks. She knows only too well how absurd the world can become when its cruel business becomes overheated, when it is no longer against the law not enforcing the law.
Indeed, police officers today need to either A) enforce the law on illegals or B) quit enforcing the law on legal citizens. After reestablishing our laws, rules and regulations, we then need to protect the integrity of our voting system by sealing off our borders. Most important, though, we need to return to our Founders desire to legislate, administrate, and judge as little as possible.
This is copyrighted material. Any political forum or organization representing the spirit of Ron Paul has permission to reprint it. Likewise, because of Freedom of the Press, any individual has the right to reprint it. However, no commercial media or any individual working for such a business, because they no longer represent the people, have that right.

Bump

Elwar
06-29-2010, 06:31 AM
Police need to enforce the law everywhere, down to the 'T'.

The more laws are enforced, the more people will get upset with those laws.

I see so many people who will argue that this or that law is necessary for the greater good, etc. But they're usually the ones who are fine with "bending the rules". Writing off lunch with friends as a business expense, driving with a beer in a cup, stocking up on Cuban cigars during a trip, etc.

Too many people see laws as laws for other people, not for themselves. Once people start getting busted for breaking the law, they'll think twice the next time they spout off "there oughta be a law...".

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
06-29-2010, 10:05 AM
Police need to enforce the law everywhere, down to the 'T'.

The more laws are enforced, the more people will get upset with those laws.

I see so many people who will argue that this or that law is necessary for the greater good, etc. But they're usually the ones who are fine with "bending the rules". Writing off lunch with friends as a business expense, driving with a beer in a cup, stocking up on Cuban cigars during a trip, etc.

Too many people see laws as laws for other people, not for themselves. Once people start getting busted for breaking the law, they'll think twice the next time they spout off "there oughta be a law...".

So, a sign asking illegal Mexicans to stay out of our nation shouldn't be enforced as a law? Why should we persecute legal citizens with having to obey the laws while illegals, because they aren't here legally, live above the law?
If for no other reason, we need laws, rules, and regulations to protect the quality of our food. First off, it is not traditional in this nation to eat insects as the practice is more customary for the indegenous Mexican living in Mexico. So, we like to try to keep them and other "pests" out of our food. Secondly, thousands of laws, rules, and regulations are followed in the process of bringing clean, fresh food to the market.

ninepointfive
06-29-2010, 10:08 AM
We need County Sheriffs who are on our side!

tremendoustie
06-29-2010, 10:28 AM
So, a sign asking illegal Mexicans to stay out of our nation shouldn't be enforced as a law?


No, because others don't have a right to dictate to a property owner who they do and do not allow. A sign set up by a property owner asking certain persons to stay out of his/her property should be what's enforced.



Why should we persecute legal citizens with having to obey the laws while illegals, because they aren't here legally, live above the law?

We should enforce laws against harming persons or property. Other, malum prohibitum laws, are B.S., and should not be enforced.



If for no other reason, we need laws, rules, and regulations to protect the quality of our food. First off, it is not traditional in this nation to eat insects as the practice is more customary for the indegenous Mexican living in Mexico. So, we like to try to keep them and other "pests" out of our food. Secondly, thousands of laws, rules, and regulations are followed in the process of bringing clean, fresh food to the market.

C'mon, seriously? You think the reason there aren't bugs in your cereal box is because of laws? Why, if it weren't for the law, general mills would put aphids in for extra crunch!

The reason companies keep their food clean is that nobody would buy their product otherwise. What they fear is massive, bad publicity, not some slap on the wrist by the FDA. You sound like a democrat here :p. Why, if it weren't for the law, the world would stop spinning!

Elwar
06-29-2010, 10:34 AM
Why should we persecute legal citizens with having to obey the laws while illegals, because they aren't here legally, live above the law?

We should prosecute both, or get rid of the laws altogether. Otherwise laws are merely means for police to play favorites.


If for no other reason, we need laws, rules, and regulations to protect the quality of our food.

No we don't.

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
06-29-2010, 12:15 PM
We need County Sheriffs who are on our side!

Because we are the only nation established on truths, or on "The" Truth (which is what these practical truths reduce to), we have a Civil Purpose to protect, or, better yet, a Formal Culture. So, we aren't trying to keep individuals out of our nation but the tyranny they transport in with them when they cross over our borders illegally.

tremendoustie
06-29-2010, 12:19 PM
We should prosecute both, or get rid of the laws altogether. Otherwise laws are merely means for police to play favorites.


Police shouldn't enforce immoral laws. To do something you know to be wrong, simply because it's the "law" is absolutely immoral.

Just as I would laud a cop who refused to arrest blacks for drinking out of "white" fountains, who intentionally turned a blind eye to the underground railroad, or who refused to intern Japanese people during WW2, I laud modern cops who take a stand for what's right.

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
06-29-2010, 11:32 PM
Police shouldn't enforce immoral laws. To do something you know to be wrong, simply because it's the "law" is absolutely immoral.

Just as I would laud a cop who refused to arrest blacks for drinking out of "white" fountains, who intentionally turned a blind eye to the underground railroad, or who refused to intern Japanese people during WW2, I laud modern cops who take a stand for what's right.

Well, yes. Some property deeds still to this day claim that their owners can't sell to African Americans. But we aren't talking about lauding cops for refusing to follow their consciences. We are talking about enforcing the law at the border in order to keep illegal aliens out of this nation. Is it any wonder that we can't do this?

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
06-29-2010, 11:40 PM
We should prosecute both, or get rid of the laws altogether. Otherwise laws are merely means for police to play favorites.



No we don't.

The issue isn't about laws. The issue is whether the police should organize to treat legal citizens and illegals the same. As local governments are forcing police to look the other way in regards to enforcing immigration laws, should the police also look the other way in regards to enforcing laws against legal citizens. If the police continue choosing to follow such absurd enforcement policies, then the day is fast approaching when illegals will be employed as police officers.