View Full Version : Beck shows true colors AGAIN...stabs J.D. Hayworth in the back to save McCain
sofia
06-23-2010, 02:21 PM
Beck breathlessly announced on his show today that
"J.D. Hayworth's campaign is finished. I'm not a McCain fan as you know, but this development kills Hayworth"
A tape has surfaced of a 2007 infomercial for government grants featuring JD Hayworth as a guest spokesman. Hayworth is used to help pitch a "How you can get a government grant to start a business" book.
Of course, such a TV ad doesnt make Hayworth look good ....but Beck and his silly cohorts were carrying on and on and on as if it were a major scandal.
He kept repeating that "Hayworth is done....Hayworth is done"
Not that I'm a big fan of J.D. myself.....but he's way better than the POS lunatic McCain who has GOT to go.
Beck did McCain a HUGE favor today....just like he did for Slick Rick Perry....another RINO that Beck "isnt too crazy about."
what an evil bastard this Beck is.....
teamrican1
06-23-2010, 02:30 PM
A good thing. Hayworth is a buffoon, and a neocon to boot. The better option is for the Liberty Movement to get behind David Nolan in the general election.
freshjiva
06-23-2010, 02:34 PM
This is a nonevent. JD Hayworth is of little value to the Liberty movement.
KAAAAAAHHHHN!
i mean
buEEECCCCCCKKKKKK!
devil21
06-23-2010, 02:37 PM
This is a nonevent. JD Hayworth is of little value to the Liberty movement.
That's the small part. Look at the bigger picture. Beck is once again using his position to ensure a status quo politician keeps his seat. Think he won't act the same way when it's a Liberty candidate? Oh wait he already did...Medina. He'll do it every time. He's a shill! Did he mention Nolan? No? Surprise!
ChaosControl
06-23-2010, 02:41 PM
Hayworth sucks, but I don't see the big deal with such a tv appearance. You can oppose things existing but still make use of them while they do.
Nate-ForLiberty
06-23-2010, 02:42 PM
KAAAAAAHHHHN!
i mean
buEEECCCCCCKKKKKK!
http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/iloled-pam.jpg
AuH2O
06-23-2010, 02:52 PM
Blah. Hayworth sucked already, and deserves to be flamed for this.
If there were a candidate running against, say, Lindsay Graham, and Beck exposed that the challenger wasn't all he was cracked up to be, I suppose that would make him and evil bastard too?
low preference guy
06-23-2010, 02:59 PM
If there were a candidate running against, say, Lindsay Graham, and Beck exposed that the challenger wasn't all he was cracked up to be, I suppose that would make him and evil bastard too?
Of course.
Kregisen
06-23-2010, 02:59 PM
I'm been thinking about whether to vote for Hayworth just to get rid of F*cking McCain or vote for the best candidate (I'm not even sure who else is running against them?)
But yeah, Hayworth is probably not much better than McCain.
paulitics
06-23-2010, 03:44 PM
I was under the impression that Hayworth was a tea party guy, and McCain probably ranks at a 0 on the freedom index, and Hayworth perhaps a 6.
Since Beck is compelled to say "I'm not a McCain guy, but.......makes me think Hayworth is probably better than we think. I am going to now have to research Hayworth.
Southron
06-23-2010, 04:02 PM
John McCain 2012!
specsaregood
06-23-2010, 04:07 PM
and McCain probably ranks at a 0 on the freedom index,
Well according to this years JBS "freedom index" mccain scores a 90/100 :eek:
McCain won't finish his term anyway while Hayworth will be there for decades. Let McCain squeak by and be a touch worse than Hayworth and in 6 years we can reassess. Paulitics is correct, Hayworth is barely better than McCain.
Keep in mind the ultimate decider for Beck: Sarah Palin endorsed John McCain. That is all that needs to be said.
Well according to this years JBS "freedom index" mccain scores a 90/100 :eek:
Scary, but one must look back to 2007 and 2008 for the real measurements.
paulitics
06-23-2010, 04:15 PM
Well according to this years JBS "freedom index" mccain scores a 90/100 :eek:
Haha. It's an election year. This just proves corruption abounds in congress. The Senators who's job is on the line vote pro freedom for 12 months, and then they betray their constituents in record time when their job is secure for 6 years.
Haha. It's an election year. This just proves corruption abounds in congress. The Senators who's job is on the line vote pro freedom for 12 months, and then they betray their constituents in record time when their job is secure for 6 years.
He's not even doing that, he is just voting with Republicans on virtually every issue. No need to think. His co-signing onto S. 604 (Fed Audit) was a purely political move.
jmdrake
06-23-2010, 04:45 PM
A good thing. Hayworth is a buffoon, and a neocon to boot. The better option is for the Liberty Movement to get behind David Nolan in the general election.
Why is it either or? You can support Hayworth in the primary just to get rid of McCain and still support Nolan in the general. Anyway there are enough good candidates across the nation running at this point to soak up our limited resources that aren't neocon lite (Hayworth) or totally out of the running (Nolan).
michaelwise
06-23-2010, 05:01 PM
When in doubt, vote the incumbent out. All incumbents must go no matter what. Stick to the program. The message to Washington is what is most important.
erowe1
06-23-2010, 05:18 PM
When in doubt, vote the incumbent out. All incumbents must go no matter what. Stick to the program. The message to Washington is what is most important.
I definitely think there's something to be said for this.
Even if Hayworth is terrible, having someone in the Senate who knows he can't take his job for granted is a good thing.
HOLLYWOOD
06-23-2010, 05:33 PM
Hayworth sucks, but I don't see the big deal with such a tv appearance. You can oppose things existing but still make use of them while they do.
Yeah, JD could sell Union memberships on TV and Juan McCain would still be more Liberal.
I'm sure Joe Lieberman took care of his 'Bottom Bitch' John McCain with some calls into News Corp Manhattan , to ensure the message is conveyed by Beck on the airwaves.
Doesn't the AZ Tea party support Jim Deakin?
John Taylor
06-23-2010, 05:36 PM
Hayworth isn't a "consistent conservative" as his signs here proclaim him to be, he's a big-spending corporatist republican. Now, I happen to actually think keeping McCain in there another term will be better than replacing him with Hayworth---if only for one reason alone. McCain will not run for reelection again, and when he retires, we in the liberty movement will have a good shot at getting someone like Jeff Flake to run for that seat, and win it.
FreeTraveler
06-23-2010, 05:37 PM
J.D. Hayworth reminds me of the opera commercials.
"I have a structured settlement and I need cash now!"
"Call J.D. Wentworth, 877-Cash-Now!"
FrankRep
06-23-2010, 06:00 PM
The better option is for the Liberty Movement to get behind David Nolan in the general election.
1% doesn't win elections.
John Taylor
06-23-2010, 06:03 PM
1% doesn't win elections.
As the Libertarian Party has been reluctant to learn over the last 35 years...
I think it fairly likely that Beck didn't savage Hayworth to save McCain, but rather because Hayworth needed to be savaged...after spending years savaging the taxpayer and conservative principles alike.
sailingaway
06-23-2010, 06:05 PM
I'd vote for H just because Beck was trying to sink him. It puts him in such good company. H must not be for special interests enough, since that seems to be what motivates these frantic partisan attacks of Beck's.
Yeah, he had John Kasich on today, he's our crappy 'other' choice for governor over the jackass socialist that is in there now. Beck was going on and on about how he loved Kasich today on the radio.
Kasich voted for the assault weapons ban. So Beck loves someone that is anti second amendment.
chadhb
06-23-2010, 06:58 PM
McCain is one is the biggest traitors to this country, that we have probably witnessed in our lifetimes, yet he should be re-elected? Hayworth can sell his own mother on Ebay, for all I care.
specsaregood
06-23-2010, 07:02 PM
I'd vote for H just because Beck was trying to sink him. It puts him in such good company. H must not be for special interests enough, since that seems to be what motivates these frantic partisan attacks of Beck's.
On the otherhand, Hannity had Hayworth on his radio show yesterday and it was a big lovefest. I don't think we're winning either way.
John Taylor
06-23-2010, 07:04 PM
I'd vote for H just because Beck was trying to sink him. It puts him in such good company. H must not be for special interests enough, since that seems to be what motivates these frantic partisan attacks of Beck's.
What? I'm glad you're not a fellow Arizonan. Hayworth is a snake in the grass, a corporatist of corporatists. McCain is horrible on foreign policy, and on most thing domestically as well, but Hayworth will just be a younger McCain. We should support Deakin.
AuH20
06-23-2010, 07:05 PM
This thread is misguided. Hayworth is buried down double digits without any of Beck's interference and Beck was simply illustrating his hypocrisy. Beck loathes McCain however.
YouTube - John Mccain gets slammed by Glenn Beck on his AMNESTY plan! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVWYQ2A54OI)
YouTube - Glenn Beck: McCain Would've Been Worse (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHqCNOhiYNg)
AlterEgo
06-23-2010, 07:13 PM
YouTube - Palin Endorses JD Hayworth on Larry King (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBnADJb_B0s&feature=player_embedded)
7_digitz
06-23-2010, 07:32 PM
this is the same guy who said hillary clinton and brack obama would fair better as president than john mccain. this is also the same person that likened himself to a "rodeo clown"
Flash
06-23-2010, 07:33 PM
this is the same guy who said hillary clinton and brack obama would fair better as president than john mccain. this is also the same person that likened himself to a "rodeo clown"
Well he was actually right. If we had Mccain as President then guess what would have happened? There would be no Tea Party movement, it would be business as usual.
erowe1
06-23-2010, 07:41 PM
this is the same guy who said hillary clinton and brack obama would fair better as president than john mccain.
Bad example. That line is one of the reasons Beck has the level of popularity among RP supporters that he does.
specsaregood
06-23-2010, 07:45 PM
Now, I happen to actually think keeping McCain in there another term will be better than replacing him with Hayworth---if only for one reason alone. McCain will not run for reelection again, and when he retires, we in the liberty movement will have a good shot at getting someone like Jeff Flake to run for that seat, and win it.
As much as I would love to see McCain go from presidential nomination to being primaried......I must agree. Let McCain have one more go around and start prepping for a liberty related replacement now. Hopefully he doesn't finish his term; and I mean that in the nicest way.
trey4sports
06-23-2010, 07:49 PM
this is the same guy who said hillary clinton and brack obama would fair better as president than john mccain. this is also the same person that likened himself to a "rodeo clown"
bad form...
sofia
06-23-2010, 07:50 PM
u guys are missing the point of my OP....
the point is that once again, when it matters most....Beck places himself at the beck & call (I couldn't resist) of his Establishment masters.
Beck was protecting McCain......just like he protected Perry
AlexMerced
06-23-2010, 07:53 PM
I don't know if I think JD Hayworth is really one of us... but ok...
AuH20
06-23-2010, 07:53 PM
u guys are missing the point of my OP....
the point is that once again, when it matters most....Beck places himself at the beck & call (I couldn't resist) of his Establishment masters.
Beck was protecting McCain......just like he protected Perry
Just like he eviscerated Bob Bennett's heir apparent right before the Utah primary. ;)
Kregisen
06-23-2010, 07:54 PM
What? I'm glad you're not a fellow Arizonan. Hayworth is a snake in the grass, a corporatist of corporatists. McCain is horrible on foreign policy, and on most thing domestically as well, but Hayworth will just be a younger McCain. We should support Deakin.
I agree, that's what I'm gonna do.
Lots of good points in this thread.....basically we're voting for hell or hades with mccain and hayworth, let's just start voting for the best candidate and like others have said, if McCain does win, he's out in 2016 either way, and we can get a true liberty candidate in. Let's not settle for a 2 for 12 years if we can get a 1 for 6 years and a 6-10 for the next 6 years.
We need to keep the liberty movment going, and that won't happen if Hayworth gets in and stays in for a career.
sofia
06-23-2010, 08:50 PM
Just like he eviscerated Bob Bennett's heir apparent right before the Utah primary. ;)
actually, he tried to screw us on that one as well!!!!
Instead of promoting Lee, he had both candidates on seperate days and then said it's up to the people of Utah.
Lee was CLEARLY the liberty candidate and all Beck could do for him is say that both candidates sounded OK but he's not sure. He took a shot at Hightower for certain votes...but then took shot at Lee for being a lawyer wheras Hightower was a businessman.
Pure bullshit!...The distinction was very clear but Beck tried to muddle it. It would be like having Greyson and rand on the show and then saying "They both sound OK"
wake up man...this guy is a total FAKE!
Brian4Liberty
06-23-2010, 09:19 PM
Why is it either or? You can support Hayworth in the primary just to get rid of McCain and still support Nolan in the general. Anyway there are enough good candidates across the nation running at this point to soak up our limited resources that aren't neocon lite (Hayworth) or totally out of the running (Nolan).
Sounds good.
When in doubt, vote the incumbent out. All incumbents must go no matter what. Stick to the program. The message to Washington is what is most important.
Agreed.
Even if Hayworth and McCain were identical, best to get rid of John "Bailout Wall St" McAmnesty... A junior Hayworth is far better than a senior McShame.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.