View Full Version : A Private New York Evening with Ron Paul
ChristopherJ
10-13-2007, 09:51 PM
Good Stuff!
Part 1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4kunzNhhmY)
Part 2 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6byoq9NFbbo)
Part 3 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwpAEv3WHCQ)
Part 4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4kunzNhhmY)
kylejack
10-13-2007, 09:51 PM
Not so private!
kylejack
10-13-2007, 09:52 PM
That a lot of :thousandbux:
ChristopherJ
10-13-2007, 09:52 PM
Not so private!
Haha - some of the stuff he says I think is suppose to be private too :)
very good stuff! very classy!
Where's part 1? Your first link is actually part 4. I can't find it on Youtube..
ACJohn
10-13-2007, 09:55 PM
part 1 lined to part 4 pooched link
ChristopherJ
10-13-2007, 09:56 PM
Where's part 1? Your first link is actually part 4. I can't find it on Youtube..
Oh sorry :o
Click on the guys name and you can see them all from there.
ChristopherJ
10-13-2007, 10:01 PM
Here is part 1 - Sorry about that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owBzTaLStRo
Here is part 1 - Sorry about that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owBzTaLStRo
that is one hot girl. :D
terlinguatx
10-13-2007, 10:12 PM
...
ChristopherJ
10-13-2007, 10:17 PM
i'm surprised they let you bring a camera in
I didn't film this - Just saw it on YouTube
Here is part 1 - Sorry about that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owBzTaLStRo
Loved that, thanks. Whoever threw that party has a cozy little home there..
Carol would make a great First Lady, she's so ....normal. And the spontaneous little thing about the roses was sweet.
andrewgreve
10-13-2007, 10:28 PM
Y'all heard RP mention Mises in part 1! Now if you don't know, it's time to go: http://mises.org/media.aspx
terlinguatx
10-13-2007, 10:30 PM
...
Fantastic! Thank you very much!
What happened? Wanted to watch part 2 and got this message when I clicked on the link: "This is a private video. If you have been sent this video, please make sure you accept the sender's friend request"
American
10-13-2007, 10:33 PM
Its set to private now, whats up with that?
Hmmmm, that's unfortunate.
Its set to private now, whats up with that?
Could be because those attending payed a lot of money to have this "private" evening. Having it on Youtube is not exactly private... Just guessing.
andrewgreve
10-13-2007, 10:36 PM
It's all down now. I was lucky enough to get to see the first two parts. I guess the poster wants to keep it a private video..
wgadget
10-13-2007, 10:37 PM
Dang...I missed part 4.
richard1984
10-13-2007, 10:37 PM
yep.
This is a private video. If you have been sent this video, please make sure you accept the sender's friend request.
How can I befriend the person who posted these videos? I promise I'm a good friend!
terlinguatx
10-13-2007, 10:38 PM
...
ChristopherJ
10-13-2007, 10:38 PM
That sucks!
Well congrats if you got to watch all 4 parts :)
richard1984
10-13-2007, 10:38 PM
It's all down now. I was lucky enough to get to see the first two parts. I guess the poster wants to keep it a private video..
that's gay. :mad:
(no offense intended)
Thunderbolt
10-13-2007, 10:40 PM
I couldn't watch any of it!
Syren123
10-13-2007, 10:40 PM
I saw it all...no reason for it to be so 'private' - nothing earthshattering or top secret. It was RP talking to a group of people in what looked like someone's New York apartment - maybe 20-30 people, hard to tell...the video wasn't too pro as it got blurry alot, when Carol would be talking, she'd be out of the frame, stuff like that.
He talked about how young people are really taking to the freedom message; how there are meetups in 21 countries so the message must resonate with others who are unhappy with their govts; about gold and silver as legal tender; other reps in Congress being much friendlier to him these days and surprised there are so many of 'us' out there - more than they ever expected! LOL And how one liberal dem congressman wrote him a nice letter about a speech he had written, how the rep was going to steal lots of parts of it, but he wasn't going to vote for RP's bill anyway. How some reps have said they wished they were honest like RP and could vote like he does, but it's too much work and they're afraid if they vote with integrity, they won't get reelected cuz they won't bring pork home to their districts.
He said they are getting many many more interview requests than they ever have and it's because of the money. Someone asked what we can do to change the attitude of the media and how we can help. Carol said keep writing them, tell them what you think about their coverage of RP, and he said just keep doing what we're doing.
It was like being in the living room with a group of folks hearing RP talk about stuff. Fun like that.
kaligula
10-13-2007, 10:46 PM
I saw it all...no reason for it to be so 'private' - nothing earthshattering or top secret.
In part 4 I think there was a pretty strong hint that Paul will actually make a 3rd party run.
In part 4 I think there was a pretty strong hint that Paul will actually make a 3rd party run.
I hereby nominate you ANTAGONIZER OF THE DAY
American
10-13-2007, 10:49 PM
yep.
How can I befriend the person who posted these videos? I promise I'm a good friend!
This is the poster, and the web site that was in the video.
http://austinpetersen.com/
Syren123
10-13-2007, 10:50 PM
In part 4 I think there was a pretty strong hint that Paul will actually make a 3rd party run.
He said it's not in his plan, just as he has said all five zillion other times he's been asked.
LibertyEagle
10-13-2007, 10:50 PM
Oh sorry :o
Click on the guys name and you can see them all from there.
Does anyone remember the guy's name?
richard1984
10-13-2007, 10:51 PM
In part 4 I think there was a pretty strong hint that Paul will actually make a 3rd party run.
Oh really now?
Why would he be talking about that? Isn't he making a Republican party run right now? Are things going worse than I realize? Why would he say that?
I'm not sure I (want to) believe you.
Do you have quotes or anything? Approximations will suffice.
ChristopherJ
10-13-2007, 10:51 PM
I hereby nominate you ANTAGONIZER OF THE DAY
LOL - Well RP didn't actually say it. He was asked and he said he didn't think so and Carol chimed in and said "just you wait"
richard1984
10-13-2007, 10:53 PM
LOL - Well RP didn't actually say it. He was asked and he said he didn't think so and Carol chimed in and said "just you wait"
"just you wait" because Ron Paul is going to WIN!!!!!!
LOL - Well RP didn't actually say it. He was asked and he said he didn't think so and Carol chimed in and said "just you wait"
She said what?! Grrrr.. that little..... :D
Syren123
10-13-2007, 10:56 PM
"just you wait" because Ron Paul is going to WIN!!!!!!
That's right. She said "just wait" and she did mean that it's because he's going to win. And everybody laughed and someone said, "Carol KNOWS SOMETHING!"
terlinguatx
10-13-2007, 10:57 PM
...
richard1984
10-13-2007, 10:58 PM
This is the poster, and the web site that was in the video.
http://austinpetersen.com/
I really just meant, "how can I subscribe to his youtube channel?" ;)
But is that even enough to see private videos? Maybe not....
libertarianguy
10-13-2007, 11:23 PM
test
richard1984
10-13-2007, 11:25 PM
third parties suck! Don't associate yourselves with that trash
I would say, rather, that the system sucks. Two parties suck!
What country are we living in again?
libertarianguy
10-13-2007, 11:42 PM
test
richard1984
10-13-2007, 11:47 PM
work inside the party until they throw you out, then go out on your own. Don't associate with the libertarian party, it will KILL you
Oh. Well in that case, yeah. Of course.
I thought just meant what you said. ;) Sorry. :D
Ron Paul supporters who still ask him "will you run in a third party?" let their anxiety get to them far too easily. We need a little more faith in this country. I think it'd go a long way in improving our situations.
Of course, I'm retarded, so what do I know? :rolleyes:
CMoore
10-14-2007, 12:04 AM
Having usually supported Libertarian candidates, I am well aware of the obstacles to ballot access by third parties. Dr. Paul also knows this since he has run as a Libertarian. If he does not get the Republican nomination, it is all over for this presidential cycle for him. If you do not receive the nomination of one of the two major parties, you will not be elected to the presidency. The money and energy needed to mount a third party campaign are just too huge to overcome. Even Perot with all of his money could not do it. If we want Dr. Paul to be elected, it is crucial he win the party's nomination. You are wasting your time speculating about a third party run. Mrs. Paul's statements, I believe, were directed toward his performance in winning the Republican nomination. She has great faith. Don't jump on her.
kylejack
10-14-2007, 12:08 AM
Perot did overcome the obstacles. I'm confident he would have been elected if not for the dropping out of the race twice.
CMoore
10-14-2007, 12:10 AM
He also had massive amounts of his own money. While Dr. Paul's fundraising is impressive, it can't compare to the deep pockets of a billionaire.
kylejack
10-14-2007, 12:13 AM
Did you know that Perot was polling first at one point? Incredible what he accomplished.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE7DB133EF932A25755C0A9649582 60
CMoore
10-14-2007, 12:15 AM
I don't question that his campaign was amazing. Plus I actually voted for him. However, he had an unlimited supply of money, his own money.
I don't question that his campaign was amazing. Plus I actually voted for him. However, he had an unlimited supply of money, his own money.
We need a billionaire running mate who is a friend of Liberty.
Know of any? :) Bill Gates seems to get in trouble because of government regulation, maybe he can run alongside Paul? ha
kylejack
10-14-2007, 12:21 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_G._Koch
CMoore
10-14-2007, 12:21 AM
If Bill Gates were interested, I believe he would simply run himself. Nobody is going to spend his own money getting someone else elected just to be vice president.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_G._Koch
He looks good. time for me to google!
updateS:
he has oil on his hands.
but he has ran as a libertarian VP, and has 17billion. whos to say he wont do it again, and this time, with money!
Johncjackson
10-14-2007, 01:03 AM
He looks good. time for me to google!
updateS:
he has oil on his hands.
but he has ran as a libertarian VP, and has 17billion. whos to say he wont do it again, and this time, with money!
It was David who ran for VP.
That and the LP nom will get you 1% The whole point of him being the VP in 1980 was the money. The Kochs had the money back then.
Independent, maybe more. But I'm not sure the Kochs are even on our side these days.
kylejack
10-14-2007, 01:12 AM
It was David who ran for VP.
That and the LP nom will get you 1% The whole point of him being the VP in 1980 was the money. The Kochs had the money back then.
Independent, maybe more. But I'm not sure the Kochs are even on our side these days.
They abandoned the party because the party turned its back on them.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.