PDA

View Full Version : Recent Stutzman email




erowe1
05-02-2010, 10:57 AM
I was just forwarded this email that was sent out by the Stutzman campaign (a rival of Hostettler's in the Indiana Senate race). I'll let you all judge for yourselves what you think of this.



A note of great concern

Dear Hoosier voter,

Is the New World Order "Jewish"?
February 12, 2005

http://www.savethemales.ca/000808.html

Let's begin by defining the "New World Order."

The mainspring of the New World Order is the desire on the part of the world's central bankers to translate their vast economic power into permanent global institutions of political and social control.

Their power is based on their monopoly over credit. They use the government's credit to print money, and require the taxpayer to fork over billions in interest to them.

Central banks like the Federal Reserve pretend to be government institutions. They are not. They are privately owned by perhaps 300 families. It is significant that the majority of these families are Jewish, how significant I am not yet sure. If they were Lutherans or Zulus, certainly our objections would be the same.

I am a non-observant Jew who believes this situation is lethal for humanity and Jews alike. We have already seen the tragic consequences of it in World War II.

The American inventor Thomas Edison described this colossal scam, which the New World Order is designed to perpetuate, as follows:

"It is absurd to say our country can issue bonds and cannot issue currency. Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurer and the other helps the people."

Central banks also control the supply of credit to businesses and individuals. Robert Hemphill, Credit Manager of the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta describes this untenable situation.

"This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money, we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is almost incredible, but there it is... It is so important that our present civilization may collapse unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon." "

When the Federal Reserve was inaugurated in 1913, a London banker acknowledged that it is a scam.

"The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class... The great body of the people, mentally incapable of comprehending, will bear its burden without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical (contrary) to their interests."

CONSEQUENCES

Obviously printing money should be in the public sphere as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution. This anomalous situation is the source of humanity's woes. It pits the people who control the economy against society as a whole. It is in their interest to destabilize society, foster immorality, internal division (like gay marriage) and war in order to increase debt and distract and control the masses.

The bankers are responsible for social engineering programs such as the (****) sexual revolution, feminism and multiculturalism, which undermine family and social cohesion. This fundamental antagonism also supports a vast criminal underworld actually run by the elites.

The bankers are responsible for the assassinations of presidents like Lincoln and JFK, and for the attack on the World Trade Center. They own or control the mass media, which legitimizes G.W. Bush, the war in Iraq and the impending attack on Iran. War provides an excuse to introduce the draft and a repressive police state.

Success today is based on a person's willingness to become an accomplice, witting or unwitting, to the banker fraud. Even rich entrepreneurs are dependent on credit and are unwilling to support genuine change.

As a result of the bankers' scam, Western society and culture are based on a fraud. We do not have genuine democracy or equal access to the mass media or open and truthful education. Western society is a fraud, run by cowards who know they're frauds.


ARE "THE JEWS" RESPONSIBLE?


The New World Order is a hydra-headed monster. The bankers work through many fronts such as Communism, socialism, liberalism, feminism, Zionism, neo conservatism and Freemasonry. Unknown to most members, these "progressive" movements are all secretly devoted to "world revolution" which is a euphemism for banker hegemony. (See my "Rothschild Conducts Red Symphony")

The bankers control the world's major corporations, media, intelligence agencies, think tanks, foundations and universities. They are responsible for suppressing the truth. Jews figure prominently in all of this, a cause of anti Semitism. Of course many other people are pursuing "success" as well.

The bankers also work through countries. They are largely responsible for British and American imperialism, whose aim is to monopolize the world's wealth. In his book "The Jews" (1922) British social critic Hilaire Belloc writes that the British Empire represented a partnership between Jewish finance and the British aristocracy.

"After Waterloo [1815] London became the money market and the clearing house of the world. The interests of the Jew as a financial dealer and the interests of this great commercial polity approximated more and more. One may say that by the last third of the nineteenth century, they had become virtually identical."

The confluence of Jewish and British interest extended to marriage.

"Marriages began to take place, wholesale, between what had once been the aristocratic territorial families of this country and the Jewish commercial fortunes. After two generations of this, with the opening of the twentieth century, those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood was the exception.

In nearly all of them was the strain more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name was still an English name and the traditions those of a purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and character had become wholly Jewish..."

If the marriage of Al Gore's daughter with Jacob Schiff's grandson is any indication, this mingling of Jewish and Gentile elites extends to America as well. John Forbes Kerry is another example.

Belloc continues to say that the British and Jewish goal of world domination was synonymous and used Freemasonry as an instrument.

"Specifically Jewish institutions, such as Freemasonry (which the Jews had inaugurated as a sort of bridge between themselves and their hosts in the seventeenth century) were particularly strong in Britain, and there arose a political tradition, active, and ultimately to prove of great importance, whereby the British state was tacitly accepted by foreign governments as the official protector of the Jews in other countries.

It was Britain which was expected to intervene [wherever Jewish persecution took place and] to support the Jewish financial energies throughout the world, and to receive in return the benefit of that connection."

If Belloc is right, you could say the New World Order is an extension of the British Empire, in which elite British, American and Jewish interests are indistinguishable. See also my "The Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism."


CONCLUSION: WHAT IS JEWISH?

The majority of Jews would want no part of the New World Order a.k.a. "globalization" if they understood its undemocratic character and how they are being used.

The true Jewish spirit holds that truth and morality are absolute and cannot be trimmed to fit one's perceived self interest. G.J. Nueberger expresses this spirit in his essay "The Great Gulf Between Zionism and Judaism."

"The Jewish people are chosen not for domination over others, not for conquest or warfare, but to serve G-d and thus to serve mankind...Thus physical violence is not a tradition or a value of the Jews. The task for which the Jewish people were chosen is not to set an example of military superiority or technical achievements, but to seek perfection in moral behaviour and spiritual purity.

Of all the crimes of political Zionism, the worst and most basic, and which explains all its other misdeeds, is that from its beginning Zionism has sought to separate the Jewish people from their G-d, to render the divine covenant null and void, and to substitute a "modern" statehood and fraudulent sovereignty for the lofty ideals of the Jewish people."

The bankers obviously aren't concerned about true Judaism or racial purity and were quite willing to sacrifice millions of Jews to achieve their design by backing Hitler. They are sacrificing thousands more Jewish, American and Muslim lives in the Middle East in their Orwellian "perpetual war for perpetual peace."

Does the New World Order serve a "Jewish" agenda or a banker elite agenda?

I would venture that it serves the latter, and the Jewish people are an instrument of this agenda like so many other people.

By giving private individuals the ability to create money out of nothing, we have created a monster which threatens to devour the planet and with it the human race.

---------------------

See also my "The Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism"

See Also my "The Riddle of Anti-Semitism"

There is much at stake in this coming election, and with the Primary Vote just days away, it has been brought to our attention that many people have a growing concern about John Hostettler's view on Israel; especially considering his close ties to and endorsement by Ron Paul. John Hostettler wrote a book Nothing for the Nation: Who Got What Out of Iraq. In it, he presents his position against the war
in Iraq, why he voted against it, and affirms the fact that he is in agreement with Ron Paul's view of Israel and the Jews.

In his book, Hostettler contends that President George W. Bush depended on intelligence provided by what Hostettler has called "neoconservatives with Jewish backgrounds." He states his belief that these people who influenced the President to invade Iraq were motivated by their ties with Israel, and that their real interest was in promoting the security of Israel. This controversial stance is of great concern and that concern has been expressed to our campaign by different sources who are familiar with the stance of Hostettler and Ron Paul on this issue.


At a recent southern Conservative conference, a reporter witnessed the following and reported:

Today at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference, a similar dynamic played out. House Republican Conference Chairman Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) was booed by Ron Paul followers during his speech. Washington Post blogger Dave Weigel, who is reporting from the conference, described the scene: "Pence says 'America stands with Israel'; Ron Paul contingent boos, shouted down by chants of 'USA!'"

Later, when it was his turn to speak at the convention, the libertarian Paul delivered a scathing criticism of Republican foreign policy views: "Conservatives spend money on different things. They like embassies, and they like occupation. They like the empire. They like to be in 135 countries and 700 bases. (boos) [...] Don't you think it's rather conservative to say, 'oh it's good to follow the Constitution, oh, except for war. Let the President go to war anytime they want.' [...] We can do better with peace than with war!" (mixture of boos and applause)

In an interview with Press TV on January 5, 2009, Ron Paul contends that we should end our special relationship with Israel. He continues with,
"If Israel has a problem they have to deal with,
I don't think it should be any of our business."

It is Marlin Stutzman's belief that America's support of the nation of Israel is crucial, especially considering the Obama administrations approach in the coming years. Marlin believes there are spiritual reasons as well as economic and democratic reasons why America should stand strong with Israel.

Please consider giving this most important issue some time and thought in making your decision for U.S. Senate this coming Tuesday. If you consider Israel a friend and ally of the United States cast your vote for Marlin! For further information, please visit our website at www.gomarlin.com.


*Federal law limits individual contributions to $2400 per election. Married couples may contribute $4800 per election. The 2010 Primary and 2010 General are considered separate elections. Corporate contributions are not permitted. Foreign nationals may not contribute. Federal election law requires political committees to use best efforts to report the name, mailing address, occupation, and name of employer of individuals whose contributions exceed $200 during an election cycle. An individual may not contribute more than a total of $2400 per election to the committee. Federal law prohibits contributions to the committee from the general treasury funds of a corporation, labor organizations or national banks (including corporate or other business entity credit cards), from any person contributing another's funds, from a Federal government contractor, or from a foreign national who lacks permanent resident status. Contributions are not deductible for Federal income tax purposes. Contributions or gifts to Hoosiers For Stutzman are not tax-deductible. Paid for by Hoosiers For Stutzman, Amber Taylor, Treasurer.

low preference guy
05-02-2010, 11:02 AM
no one is going to read such a long letter.

Young Paleocon
05-02-2010, 11:05 AM
Mises and Rothbard were jews so Stutzman can take one of his subsidized corn cobs and shove it up his ass.

Cowlesy
05-02-2010, 11:07 AM
I cannot believe his campaign staff let him send this as an official email. This has to be some sort of joke.

erowe1
05-02-2010, 11:08 AM
no one is going to read such a long letter.

The original had pictures and certain key sections set apart to grab attention.

They don't need people to read the whole thing. In fact they don't want people to read the whole thing, because anybody who does can see what kind of a tortured chain of guilt by association they're trying to make. What they want people to do is see that they have a long article that ostensibly proves Hostettler is anti-Israel.

It's just a deceptive dirty trick.

Cowlesy
05-02-2010, 11:11 AM
I don't understand why he's even going after The Hoss. Isn't Dan Coats the leader as of now?

Badger Paul
05-02-2010, 11:13 AM
What utter garbage!

The only person bringing the "Jewish Question" into the campaign is Stutzman himself. John Hostettler has not campaigned on this. It is not his platform. He has not uttered the words "Jew" or "neocon" or "Zionist" at all. This has nothing to do with him and for Stuzman to send out this email (from his campaign) shows an air of desperation. He wants to tear down Hostettler and step over him with this kind of trash.

We have to call him on this smear.

specsaregood
05-02-2010, 11:24 AM
I don't understand why he's even going after The Hoss. Isn't Dan Coats the leader as of now?

Because that is his true role in the primary, to ensure Coats' victory. But of course you already knew that....

erowe1
05-02-2010, 11:26 AM
I don't understand why he's even going after The Hoss. Isn't Dan Coats the leader as of now?

There are a lot of conservative Republicans who want anybody but Coats. I've seen multiple former Stutzman supporters in the past couple days reporting that they were going to switch over and vote Hostettler, since Stutzman's support hasn't reached a level of being able to beat Coats, but Hostettler is still in the hunt.

I'm sure the point is to prevent Stutzman voters from doing that.

Cowlesy
05-02-2010, 11:29 AM
There are a lot of conservative Republicans who want anybody but Coats. I've seen multiple former Stutzman supporters in the past couple days reporting that they were going to switch over and vote Hostettler, since Stutzman's support hasn't reached a level of being able to beat Coats, but Hostettler is still in the hunt.

I'm sure the point is to prevent Stutzman voters from doing that.

I don't know, now that I think of it, it looks like a fear-email used to gin up donations from evangelicals.

erowe1
05-02-2010, 11:30 AM
Incidentally, it doesn't come through in my copying and pasting. But the top two thirds is all one article from 2005 (as indicated in the byline at the beginning). That includes everything up to the dashed line. The only part that is actually in any way related to the current campaign (and even that only by way of ridiculous logic), is the last little bit after that. I'm not even sure what the point of including that article was, except to make it look like they had some long article that nobody would actually read to back up their assertions.

specsaregood
05-02-2010, 11:31 AM
Does Stutzman have dual-citizenship? Just wondering...

erowe1
05-02-2010, 11:33 AM
I don't know, now that I think of it, it looks like a fear-email used to gin up donations from evangelicals.

It's definitely mainly for evangelicals. But donations received at this point won't affect the May 4 primary any more. From here on out the campaigns are pretty dependent on what their volunteers can do (which is where Hostettler has his biggest advantage over both Coats and Stutzman), and good GOTV efforts. My best guess is that this email, which was sent to people who are on Stutzman's email list and are presumed to support him, is designed to stop the bleeding of anybody-but-Coats voters.

erowe1
05-02-2010, 11:38 AM
I just got another email from someone saying that the Stutzman campaign now denies that this email is genuinely theirs.

I didn't get it from them first hand. But I do know that it was forwarded to an email list by someone who is a very well-known Stutzman supporter. And if it is fake, it was clearly made to appear genuine.

Just be careful what you do with it.

angelatc
05-02-2010, 11:41 AM
I was confused. The first part of the letter seemed to be some sort of bizarre "it's the Jooz!" thing, then the second part was something about Hostettler and Ron Paul?

WTF?

AuH2O
05-02-2010, 11:48 AM
Was the entire text of that "article" written in the email, or was it just linked above the few paragraphs from Stutzman?

erowe1
05-02-2010, 11:53 AM
Was the entire text of that "article" written in the email, or was it just linked above the few paragraphs from Stutzman?

What I pasted here was copied directly from the email as it appeared when it was forwarded to me. At the very top, above the "article" appears the logo from the Stutzman campaign. So, either they included that whole article as the intro to their email, or else the whole thing is fake and made to look like the Stutzman campaign did it. All I know for sure, is that, however it came about, at least one very strong Stutzman supporter who is very close to the campaign, accepted it as genuine and forwarded it on to others.

erowe1
05-02-2010, 12:31 PM
Here's another copy that I've now seen in two places that doesn't include that article at all.

http://oneeteam.bm23.com/public/?q=preview_message&fn=Link&t=1&ssid=9844&id=embzvzyd2hztv3nz9ulzyaf6psa4x&id2=3qzi131abkxflcwrbguvif9jc65ai&subscriber_id=arbewkhwbnfodqwglbiiuktjbideblc&messageversion_id=azygcetxdrkzhzortdhfaaaktayhbef&delivery_id=amfwwlkyafxdhnqtbngmoynlntbcbih

specsaregood
05-02-2010, 12:41 PM
I know it won't happen, but I for one would like to see this used against them and turned around.

For example:
Candidate for Senate Marlin Stutzman readily admits that he REJECTS Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior; and opposes Senate Candidate John Hostettler who accepts Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior. Which candidate do you think would do a better job of representing your interests in Washington D.C.? The Christian American or the Jesus-rejecting American?

Imagine a PAC sending out postcards to christian republican voters with the headline: Marlin Stutzman rejects Jesus Christ. It's dirty, but it is also the truth. Just saying...

Cowlesy
05-02-2010, 12:42 PM
Here's another copy that I've now seen in two places that doesn't include that article at all.

http://oneeteam.bm23.com/public/?q=preview_message&fn=Link&t=1&ssid=9844&id=embzvzyd2hztv3nz9ulzyaf6psa4x&id2=3qzi131abkxflcwrbguvif9jc65ai&subscriber_id=arbewkhwbnfodqwglbiiuktjbideblc&messageversion_id=azygcetxdrkzhzortdhfaaaktayhbef&delivery_id=amfwwlkyafxdhnqtbngmoynlntbcbih

If you click the "Update Profile" button on there, does that name ring a bell?

erowe1
05-02-2010, 12:47 PM
If you click the "Update Profile" button on there, does that name ring a bell?

Nope.

AuH2O
05-02-2010, 12:49 PM
What I pasted here was copied directly from the email as it appeared when it was forwarded to me. At the very top, above the "article" appears the logo from the Stutzman campaign. So, either they included that whole article as the intro to their email, or else the whole thing is fake and made to look like the Stutzman campaign did it. All I know for sure, is that, however it came about, at least one very strong Stutzman supporter who is very close to the campaign, accepted it as genuine and forwarded it on to others.

I'm pretty sure the forwarded version had that article added in. Not only does it not really jibe with the tone of the email, it would be campaign ineptitude of "macaca" proportions to send that article officially.

Brian4Liberty
05-02-2010, 12:58 PM
If you click the "Update Profile" button on there, does that name ring a bell?

What name is there?

Cowlesy
05-02-2010, 12:59 PM
What name is there?

Don't want to type it out, click the link and see for yourself. It's just a random person and their email. The link is personalized is all.


The whole think sounds like BS to me.

erowe1
05-02-2010, 01:15 PM
Don't want to type it out, click the link and see for yourself. It's just a random person and their email. The link is personalized is all.


The whole think sounds like BS to me.

Well, it's certainly spreading among Stutzman supporters, and some of them are taking it very seriously. I'm getting ganged up on by several on a Facebook discussion underneath one of their statuses where they posted this email.

If the campaign is not officially behind it, and if they somehow let it get out in a way that will preserve plausible deniability for them, then it may turn out to have been a very shrewd (and underhanded) move on their part.

erowe1
05-02-2010, 01:26 PM
Don't want to type it out, click the link and see for yourself. It's just a random person and their email. The link is personalized is all.


The whole think sounds like BS to me.

It looks like that person is someone who has a bunch of common friends with me from among the Indiana libertarian network on Facebook. I'm guessing he's on Stutzman's constant contact list and didn't like this email so decided to share the webpage version of it.

specsaregood
05-02-2010, 01:30 PM
Well, it's certainly spreading among Stutzman supporters, and some of them are taking it very seriously. I'm getting ganged up on by several on a Facebook discussion underneath one of their statuses where they posted this email.

Ganged up how? They are saying they would prefer to have somebody that rejects Christ as their Senator?

erowe1
05-02-2010, 01:38 PM
Ganged up how? They are saying they would prefer to have somebody that rejects Christ as their Senator?

The first one posted a status about how she's concerned about Hostettler being anti-Israel and then copied and pasted that email into a comment. Other Stutzman supporters chimed in and expressed that they shared her concern. After I made a comment calling that email a smear and dirty politics, all three of them defended it and continued insisting that Hostettler is anti-Israel and anti-semitic, and has proven it in his own words.

erowe1
05-02-2010, 01:58 PM
Somebody posted this on our Hostettler for Senate FB group, and John's campaign manager put a comment under it indicating that the phrase "neoconservatives with Jewish backgrounds" is not even Hostettler's own words.

P.83 How David Aikman who wrote the book, A Man of Faith: the Spiritual Journey of George W. Bush, described Bill Kristol. Chapter 11, Note 26 John is quoting David Aikman.

That phrase is the only thing in Stutzman's entire email that even pretends to represent John in his own words.

erowe1
05-02-2010, 02:08 PM
Does anybody know how to get to a webpage version of that email that does not include anyone's personal contact information?

I'd like to send this out to more people. But I don't really think I have the right to include that information. I actually wasn't aware it was on it when I posted it here.

low preference guy
05-02-2010, 03:18 PM
Does anybody know how to get to a webpage version of that email that does not include anyone's personal contact information?

I'd like to send this out to more people. But I don't really think I have the right to include that information. I actually wasn't aware it was on it when I posted it here.

make a screen capture, remove your e-mail, and send it as a jpg or pdf file.