PDA

View Full Version : Drudge runs another Ron Paul friendly!




teacherone
04-15-2010, 07:55 AM
http://images.clickability.com/partners/370384/mainLogo.gif (http://www.dcexaminer.com/) http://images.clickability.com/logos/cc0000/printthis-logo.gif (http://javascript<b></b>:void(printArticle());)
http://images.clickability.com/pti/btn-print-page.gif (http://javascript<b></b>:void(printArticle());) http://images.clickability.com/pti/spacer.gif SAVE THIS (http://javascript<b></b>:void(open('http://www.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThis?partnerID=376964&urlID=424758638&origin=11','click','height=450,width=510,title=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,menubars=no,toolbars=no ,resizable=yes'));) | EMAIL THIS (http://javascript<b></b>:void(open('http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=createPT&partnerID=376964&urlID=424758638','click','height=450,width=510,tit le=no,location=no,scrollbars=yes,menubars=no,toolb ars=no,resizable=yes'));) | Close (http://javascript<b></b>:self.close();)
http://images.clickability.com/pti/spacer.gif
Politics

[Print] (http://www.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=Hating+the+government+finally+goes+mainstrea m+%7C+Washington+Examiner&expire=&urlID=424758638&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fpoli tics%2FHating-the-government-final#) [email] (http://www.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=Hating+the+government+finally+goes+mainstrea m+%7C+Washington+Examiner&expire=&urlID=424758638&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fpoli tics%2FHating-the-government-final#) Share (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php)http://s9.addthis.com/button1-share.gif (http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php)
Hating the government finally goes mainstream
By: Chris Stirewalt (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/bios/chris-stirewalt.html)
Political Editor
April 15, 2010
http://media.washingtonexaminer.com/images/250*157/041510polStirewalt_Paul.jpg


Three years ago, the Republican establishment piled scorn on the presidential candidacy of Ron Paul.
Today, he is in a statistical tie with President Obama in 2012 polling. His son, an ophthalmologist who has never run for elective office, is well ahead of not only the GOP's handpicked candidate for Senate in Kentucky but also both Democratic contenders -- all statewide officeholders.
What happened? Did America sudden develop an insatiable appetite for 74-year-old, cranky congressmen from Texas? Is the gold standard catching on?

Paul will not likely be the next president. And his son still faces the most arduous part of his journey as Democrats spend millions to paint him as soft on defense, lax on drug enforcement and too radical on welfare programs.
But there's no doubt that hating the government and the powerful interests that pull Washington's strings has gone from the radical precincts of the Right and Left to the mainstream.

It turns out that watching Goldman Sachs, the United Auto Workers, public employee unions and a raft of other vampires drain the treasury at America's weakest moment in a generation will make a person pretty hacked off.
After Barack Obama's election, Democrats assumed that the American people were battered, bruised and ready for a morphine drip of European-style socialism. Republicans, shocked by their stunning reversals, figured the Democrats were right and started looking for technocrats of their own.

And in a political system fueled by special-interest money, it was hard for the leaders of major parties to imagine anything other than an activist government. After all, if you pay for someone to get elected, you don't expect him to just sit there.
Just 18 months ago the leaders of both parties were quite sure that Obama would be the popular, transformative president he aspires to be. The Republicans who emerged from the wreckage of November were certain to look a lot more like Charlie Crist and Mitt Romney than Marco Rubio and Ron Paul.

But Crist's embrace of Obamanomics seems to have utterly destroyed his chances at a Senate seat that was once his for the taking. Romney, considered a near lock for the 2012 Republican nomination, has seen his candidacy badly damaged by a populist revolt against the passage of a national health care plan that looks like the one he designed for Massachusetts.

Obama, who said that passage of his health plan proved that Washington could still do big things, finds himself deeply at odds with an electorate that is not confident of government's ability to do anything at all.
His election has turned out to be not the result of a national lurch toward government intervention but his own skill at disguising his policies, the failures of the Republican Party and the bursting of the lending bubble.

A year ago, the tea parties caught most everyone by surprise.
It was a conservative flash mob and hundreds of thousands of Americans took to the streets.
Republicans scrambled to get to the head of the parade and Democrats claimed that it was all a put-up job by their enemies in the special interest wars. The press tried to treat what had been a spontaneous outburst as if it were a traditional political party and asked all the questions they teach in journalism school: Who's in charge? Who are they opposed to? Is it racist?
This year, the political parties and the press will not be caught off guard. Republican politicians will address tea party rallies, Democrats will denounce the supposed puppeteers of the movement and the press will look for hate speech.
But few will glean the real meaning of the protests or the booming support for Ron and Rand Paul.
It's not about the Pauls themselves or the guys with the "Don't tread on me" flags It's about the people at home who might not be willing to march in the park or join the next Paul money bomb, but who don't blame the folks who do.

Libertarian sentiment has finally gone mainstream.
A movement that said that people should do whatever they wanted as long as it didn't hurt anyone else couldn't compete during the culture wars that began in the 1960s.
But after two wars, a $12 trillion debt, a financial crisis and the most politically tone-deaf president in modern history, Americans may have finally given up on big government.
Chris Stirewalt is the political editor of the Washington Examiner. He can be reached at cstirewalt@washingtonexaminer.com (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/mailto:cstirewalt@washingtonexaminer.com).

Bruno
04-15-2010, 08:01 AM
Libertarian sentiment has finally gone mainstream. :)

Agorism
04-15-2010, 08:02 AM
nice

it's at bottom though :/

Bobster
04-15-2010, 08:05 AM
Paul will not likely be the next president.
Well, I guess all publicity is good publicity. I believe the average Republican still sees this as true, however we need to keep winning or placing very well in straw polls. We need to win or place 2nd to Huckabee at the VVS. Keeping Ron Paul on people's minds is better than him being ignored completely.

HOLLYWOOD
04-15-2010, 08:05 AM
Washington Examiner is truly the only print to read inside the DC beltway. The other 2 WaPo (Liberal/Leftist) & Times (RINO) are your Payola Print hot wires to the criminals on Capital Hill and Special Interest orgs.

tmosley
04-15-2010, 08:12 AM
Right, because being the only Repuiblican who polls at a tie with the sitting president just has no chance of winning.

How blatant can you get. The "Ron Paul can't win" meme is getting really old.

Sarge
04-15-2010, 08:20 AM
Some great responses to well written article. Now, if those people will spread the word to other people.

Bern
04-15-2010, 08:36 AM
At this point in time, no one is likely to win in 2012. To support such a statement, one would need to show that more than 50% of registered/likely voters are strongly/firmly supportive. No potential candidate can claim this at this time - not even Obama.

Jack Bauer
04-15-2010, 08:38 AM
Right, because being the only Repuiblican who polls at a tie with the sitting president just has no chance of winning.

How blatant can you get. The "Ron Paul can't win" meme is getting really old.

Ron Paul's problem is not that he can't get elected but that he can't get nominated.

Erazmus
04-15-2010, 09:24 AM
...as Democrats spend millions to paint him as soft on defense...

Isn't that funny. Weren't they the ones who were "outraged" about the wars and swore if they were elected to pull out of Iraq. :rolleyes:


We are at war with Eastasia. We've always been at war with Eastasia.