PDA

View Full Version : Russian emigrant seeks freedom with Texas Nationalists




FrankRep
03-28-2010, 07:24 PM
Russian emigrant seeks freedom with Texas Nationalists (http://www.texasnationalist.com/info/tnm-news/280-russian-emigrant-seeks-freedom-with-texas-nationalists-)


Texas Nationalist Movement (http://www.texasnationalist.com/)
26 March 2010


The mainstream news media and progressives scoff at suggestions that the Obama Administration is pushing the United States ever closer to a socialist dictatorship. One Texan has more justification than most, however, to know it when he sees it.

Sergei Smet grew up in the Soviet Union, where he witnessed first-hand the “brainwashing, manipulation and brutality” of unbridled socialism, and the San Antonio resident says what is going on in Washington, D.C. scares him to death.

In 2008, during the election campaign, I listened to one of Obama’s speeches,” said Smet, who tried to leave the Soviet Union for six years before winning the “green card lottery” in 1995, “I was listening to that speech for maybe five minutes and I figured out he was talking exactly like the old Soviet leaders used to talk. I was listening to this B.S. all my life!

“I said to myself, ‘Uh-oh, if he wins it’s going to be a real mess.’ I got depressed. I’m living in a socialist country again.”

Smet was a musician in the USSR, and after emigrating first to California he began living the American dream the old-fashioned way: hard work.

“It took me six years to be able to come here because I was not a religious refugee,” Smet said. “At the time it was my wife, my daughter and myself. We had no friends, no relatives, little money and little command of the language.”

Smet didn’t soak off social services, however. After first getting a job as a pizza delivery boy because of the lack of musicians’ jobs, he began studying computer technology and immersed himself in studying English while at times working three jobs. He eventually landed a job as a telecommunications administrator.

“It was freedom,” Smet said. “I was in a country where the parties changed power every few years, but we were free and the government didn’t tell us what to do.”

Then came the 2008 election.

Smet said he began looking around for some way to help stop something he knew all too well doesn’t work.

“I came here for freedom and here it’s going to be taken away again,” he said. “What to do, where to go, where to hide from the socialist agenda?”

Last spring, Smet found the website of the Texas Nationalist Movement, and hope returned.

“I really liked the ideas of the Texas Nationalist movement, because I understood that the entire political system in Washington, Democrats and Republicans alike, both of them are the same,” he said. “Nothing could be repaired any more. For me, the only solution was for one state or a group of states to secede and form their own country.”

Smet said he feared “politics” because of his experience growing up in the USSR.

“In the Soviet Union, the brainwashing system worked so well, from birth people were ‘politicized’ about how to help spread communism around the world,” Smet said. He noted that some maintain public schools are now brainwashing American schoolchildren.

“Obama and his team, they are on a mission,” he said. “They are telling us openly that their goal is to de-develop the United States and transform it to a socialist country. That is exactly what we were told, how socialist revolutions take place.”

And, Smet warns ominously, when socialist revolutions progress to a certain point, violence often becomes the only way to forestall them.

“I hear people talking about how things will change with the November elections, or in 2012,” Smet said. “In my opinion, these guys are not fools. They know what’s going to happen in November if they allow us to vote. They have two options -- not hold elections, or (rig) them.”

Smet warns that the only way to avoid a bloody revolution is for Texas to strike out on its own.

“Nothing will work to stop them,” he said. “Not the Tea Parties, not elections, it’s not going to work.

“In the Soviet Union, to get into a college you had to pass a test on how to help spread communism around the world,” he said. “Obama and his team are doing it exactly by the book. Of course, they’re doing some modifications to the tactics, but the foundation is exactly the same. It is going to be blood in the streets at some point. They will do it.”


SOURCE:
http://www.texasnationalist.com/info/tnm-news/280-russian-emigrant-seeks-freedom-with-texas-nationalists-

FrankRep
03-29-2010, 04:00 PM
Obamacare or the U.S. health care reform is indicative of socialized medicine applauded by people like Fidel Castro, Lenin, Karl Marx, Hitler and Stalin. by Art Thompson


Communist Dictator Fidel Castro Applauds Obama (http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/6143-communist-dictator-fidel-castro-applauds-obama)


Art Thompson, CEO | John Birch Society (http://www.jbs.org/)
29 March 2010


"Cuban Leader applauds US health-care reform bill." (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/25/AR2010032501309.html)

So reads the heading on an Associated Press dispatch highlighting the fact that communist dictator Fidel Castro has applauded Obama for the passage of healthcare legislation.

“We consider health reform to have been an important battle and a success of his (Obama’s) government,” Castro wrote. He went on to say that Obama needed to lead on climate change and immigration reform.

It is interesting that this notorious communist dictator would be pleased with the passage of an American piece of legislation. It is no surprise, however, to students of history, since Lenin, the person most responsible for modern communism besides Karl Marx, is widely believed to have said: “Socialized medicine is the keystone in the arch of the socialist state.”

To the average American these statements would seem incredulous. This is especially so in light of statements by those who promoted healthcare reform as a measure that would deliver more freedom for the American people. House Majority Leader Steny (D-MD) said, for example, that healthcare reform will “give patients – not insurance companies – greater control over their healthcare.”

Something doesn’t seem right. If communist leaders have stated what they have about so-called healthcare, and politicos in Washington have told us that Americans will be freer as a result of healthcare legislation, then who is right? Someone is lying.

The sad truth is that totalitarian states have always used healthcare as a means to implement government policy. Lenin did it, Hitler as well.

It is not only the insurance industry that will be placed under government control by socialized medicine. In fact, clinics, hospitals, doctors, nurses, aides and all medical personnel will be placed under the central government's control (http://www.johnbirchsociety.org/component/content/article/1006-quick-hits/6133-rep-dingell-admits-health-care-legislation-intended-to-qcontrol-the-peopleq). More importantly, all of the patients will as well.

While telling us that healthcare is liberation, in reality it is the opposite. If an American will no longer have the freedom of choice over what doctor he sees, where he sees him, and the treatment prescribed, then where is the freedom in that? Only in a totally free enterprise system can a person have the freedom to choose their doctor, their treatment, and where and when the treatment takes place.

A government system, at best, takes this freedom away. At worst, it is used as a method to subjugate — even eliminate — certain sectors of a country’s population.

Lenin used a two-pronged approach to subjugating Russian opposition to a communist dictatorship. He used a so-called war on terror that was actually a government-sponsored terror campaign on the citizens. Secondly, he used a healthcare system to control every citizen while telling them that he was giving them free medical care.

Hitler used the existing German healthcare system to impose the eugenics program he and the Nazis patterned after American eugenicists. Since the doctors and medical personnel received their income from the state, few stood in the way of euthanizing the feeble-minded or aged. It rapidly escalated to the “gene pool,” ultimately ending in killing millions of Germans and others of “inferior race.”

In addition to controlling medical care and personnel, socializing medicine interferes in other sectors of society and we are beginning to see articles and media pieces preparing us for the intrusion of healthcare regulation into these areas. Medical care not only involves our bodies as an isolated entity, it involves what the body eats, the conditions of living the body sustains, and if the body is subject to stress, either physical or mental.

We are already witnessing doctors and social workers working together for the “well being” of patients, especially in the inner cities of our country.

In addition, we have seen major attempts to bring supplements such as vitamins under the control of government. The latest attempt has been a recently withdrawn bill by Sen. John McCain.

It is not a big leap to think that the healthcare bureaucracy that will come out of the Obamacare machine will start to manufacture reasons to be involved in housing, forcing landlords to provide better living conditions for the poor. Coercion in this area is already a part of the medical process in some major cities in treating the poor.

Interference in family affairs with counseling to reduce stress likely will be part of the process. This is likely to occur in the workplace. We should also expect to see Obamacare uniting with the Department of Education to provide medical counseling and treatment in the government schools, then the private institutions as well, using health issues as the pretext. Under such regulations, vaccinations would become mandatory. Birth control, abortion, and a series of other prerogatives that are the right of the parents to decide will begin to fall under the umbrella of central government authority.

Given the breathtaking ramifications for the expansion of power on the back of health care "reform," it becomes easy to see why dictators and demagogues like Lenin, Hitler, Stalin and Castro, among others, love government healthcare. We suspect the socialists who disguise themselves as Democrats and Republicans love it too, otherwise why would they vote for it or put up weak arguments against it? In the recent fight against Obamacare, the Republican leadership never put up arguments that resonated with the people. The bill could have been stopped, but it wasn't.

Healthcare needs to be repealed, as quickly as possible. We have to be wary of those who will profess the desire to repeal simply as a fundraising ploy or to channel people into ineffective repeal programs. One of the most dangerous things that can happen is for well-meaning people to advocate a solution to repealing healthcare that will be more dangerous in the long run, such as by calling for a constitutional convention (con-con) to implement the repeal.

A con-con cannot be limited in scope. There are other arguments against using this as a solution. View our DVD, Beware of Article V (http://www.shopjbs.org/index.php/videos/beware-of-article-v-1.html) for further insight into the problems of calling a con-con.


YouTube - Beware Article V (part 1 of 4) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za8_pdJ1dPo)

We simply have to abide by the Constitution. Healthcare is un-constitutional. We do not need an amendment to clarify that fact. Besides, if the Constitution is not being adhered to now, what makes anyone think that Congress or the courts will adhere to a new amendment anymore than they do with the 2nd, 4th, or 5th Amendments now – particularly the 10th?


SOURCE:
http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/6143-communist-dictator-fidel-castro-applauds-obama

Pete_00
03-29-2010, 04:24 PM
“I hear people talking about how things will change with the November elections, or in 2012,” Smet said. “In my opinion, these guys are not fools. They know what’s going to happen in November if they allow us to vote. They have two options -- not hold elections, or (rig) them.”

Yep, this plan was in the works for decades. Thats why people should be suspicious of electronic voting machines.