"I love those gigantic t*ts" (No, this is not a Hot Topic "joke" thread)

[Anti Federalist]

'I love those gigantic t**ts'

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2904943/Airport-security-guard-John-Laker-ogled-woman-colleague-in-body-scanner.html

A HEATHROW security man was quizzed by police after ogling a girl colleague "naked" in a new anti-terror body scanner.

Jo Margetson, 29, reported John Laker, 25, after he took her picture with the X-ray gadget and made a lewd comment.

The pervy guard leered and told her: "I love those gigantic t**s."

She had entered the X-ray machine by mistake - and was horrified when Laker pressed a button to take a revealing photo.

Laker, who faces the sack, was the first airport worker to be caught abusing the controversial new devices.

They were brought in by the Government after the Christmas Day underpants bomber tried to blow up a flight to Detroit.

They produce full-body "nude" images of passengers to locate hidden weapons or explosives. This includes clear outlines of genitalia.

Opponents of the scanners, including anti-paedophile groups, have furiously condemned their use.

After Laker sneaked a look at her body and made the remark, horrified Jo told her bosses and police at the West London airport.

[amy31416]

Pics or GTFO.


(Just wanted to say it before one of the guys here does.)

[Anti Federalist]

Airport Worker Caught Ogling Image of Woman on Naked Body Scanner

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Outrage was growing today over the abuse of naked airport body scanners after it was revealed that a Heathrow worker perved over a naked image of a female colleague after she passed through one of the devices, before commenting, “I love those gigantic tits”.

Jo Margetson, 29, reported John Laker, 25, to the police after she had entered the x-ray machine by mistake and Laker took the image before making lewd comments.

One of the most important aspects of this story which the media has completely failed to mention is the fact that, despite a barrage of propaganda on behalf of the government claiming that the images produced do not show sensitive areas of the body in detail, the fact that Laker was clearly able to distinguish Margetson’s breasts proves once again that the scanners do show crisp details of genitals and other sensitive body parts.

As we have exhaustively emphasized, the body scanners do allow airport workers to see intricate details of your body – penis length, breast size, implants, piercings, including crystal clear naked shots of your children. The fact that authorities initially lied and denied this was the case as part of the agenda to hastily install scanners after the staged Christmas bombing incident was clearly a case of mass public deception and one of the primary reasons why the scanners need to be removed now.

Action for Rights of Children warned that the scanners broke child porn laws in the UK after their widespread introduction, but the government refused to make an exception and now force all Brits who are asked to go through the scanners without the alternative option of a pat down. If travelers refuse then they are barred from flying, another complete violation of the basic human right to mobility.

“I can’t bear to think about the body scanner thing,” Margetson told the Sun last night, “”I’m totally traumatised. I’ve spoken to the police about it. I’m in too much of a state to go to work.”

Laker was given a formal warning for harassment by police and faces the sack.

“When privacy-invading machines are installed at our airports, abuses like this are inevitable,” said Barrister Alex Deane, director of Big Brother Watch. “We are disturbed to hear of this case, which will lead to greater calls for these scanners to be banned.”

“For every official caught ogling like this, there are plenty more eyeing up law-abiding travellers. These expensive machines are totally disproportionate.”

As we reported last month, Indian film star Shahrukh Khan claimed that Heathrow staff printed out and circulated an image of him taken by the naked body scanner. Heathrow denied the claim but Khan did not make a retraction and had no motive for inventing the story.

Airport security staff workers are among the least trustworthy people to operate these machines. These individuals are routinely caught abusing their authority for their own ego trip or sexual perversion.

As the video below illustrates, the fact that naked body scanner machines in the U.S. are manned by TSA thugs who are routinely caught abusing their power in treating the public like prison inmates only heightens the danger posed by the use abuse of the new devices.

People in the United States need to lobby for states to pass laws nullifying use of the body scanners as a threat to privacy, health, and a total violation of human dignity, a virtual strip search that wouldn’t even have stopped the Christmas day bomber who was allowed to board the plane as a result of a U.S. State Department directive.

Idaho is leading the revolt, by passing a law that limits the use of the x-ray scanning devices in airports and government buildings and also forces Homeland Security to disprove health concerns.

We are joining the hundreds of other Americans who have filed complaints in protesting naked body scanners as an affront to privacy, dignity, and a health risk, by launching our naked body scanner contest in an effort to focus public attention on how we must stop these machines now before they are installed in the streets and become another tool of control and oppression as part of the prison planet being constructed around us.

Not only have authorities in Europe promised to roll out mobile body scanners on the streets to mass scan crowds of people, but Homeland Security has even gone a step further, developing Orwellian mind-reading devices that are set to be installed as part of unconstitutional checkpoints at public events.

We are offering our biggest prize fund ever of $15,000 for the entries that most successfully highlight the true agenda behind naked body scanners and where this is all heading unless we put our foot down now and help to build momentum behind public pressure to remove the scanners from airports.

http://www.infowars.com/airport-worker-caught-ogling-image-of-woman-on-naked-body-scanner/

[MelissaWV]

I was struck by this being "the first" report of abuse. Wasn't there a report of an Indian actor having pictures of his naughty parts circulated as a result of these scans?

[Anti Federalist]

Pics or GTFO.


(Just wanted to say it before one of the guys here does.)

Never have I been able to post this pic under more appropriate circumstances.

http://img.moronail.net/img/6/7/767.jpg

[Anti Federalist]

I was struck by this being "the first" report of abuse. Wasn't there a report of an Indian actor having pictures of his naughty parts circulated as a result of these scans?

As we reported last month, Indian film star Shahrukh Khan claimed that Heathrow staff printed out and circulated an image of him taken by the naked body scanner. Heathrow denied the claim but Khan did not make a retraction and had no motive for inventing the story.

[MelissaWV]

I hope this lady at least got a dose of reality, too. She works there. It seems like she didn't really mind being a party to these scans, but now that she knew someone was perving, she's upset. Bear in mind that, for your convenience and privacy, the person viewing your naked self is not out in the open in proposed configurations in the US.

No, you can't face your accuser; whatever gave you that notion?

[MelissaWV]

As we reported last month, Indian film star Shahrukh Khan claimed that Heathrow staff printed out and circulated an image of him taken by the naked body scanner. Heathrow denied the claim but Khan did not make a retraction and had no motive for inventing the story.

Couldn't read that because it was posted while I was typing my post. Don't be snarky :p

[amy31416]

Seriously though, I'm just not going to fly anymore. If I had kids, they sure as hell wouldn't be getting on a plane.

Enough is enough. This is beyond ridiculous.

And that underwear bomber that "prompted" all this--where the hell is the video of him from the Amsterdam airport with his alleged "well-dressed" companion? Why no investigation into the airport security? The same firm that allowed Richard Reid and many of the 9/11 hijackers through...

People accept all this reactionary bullshit without ever knowing or even asking to get the full story.

[Anti Federalist]

Couldn't read that because it was posted while I was typing my post. Don't be snarky :p

Hah, no, not being snarky...I didn't know.

;)

[Anti Federalist]

Seriously though, I'm just not going to fly anymore. If I had kids, they sure as hell wouldn't be getting on a plane.

Enough is enough. This is beyond ridiculous.

And that underwear bomber that "prompted" all this--where the hell is the video of him from the Amsterdam airport with his alleged "well-dressed" companion? Why no investigation into the airport security? The same firm that allowed Richard Reid and many of the 9/11 hijackers through...

People accept all this reactionary bullshit without ever knowing or even asking to get the full story.

The same amount of "explosives" can be hidden in body cavities, male or female.

You see what's next...:mad:

As to the bold, exactly. We don't even know for sure just what the hell went on and how he got on the plane, but now we all have to be strip searched. Bullshit.

[Rael]

Pics or GTFO.


(Just wanted to say it before one of the guys here does.)

http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01011/SNN2405A-280_1011195a.jpg

She looks rather flat chested to me.

[Deborah K]

I'm telling you - we need to market special underwear for air travel with the words in lead:

Bra: F U C K
Panties: Y O U - in front / T S A - in back

[driege]

This is just strange.

[pcosmar]

I'm telling you - we need to market special underwear for air travel with the words in lead:

Bra: F U C K
Panties: Y O U - in front / T S A - in back

Make the letters out of aluminum foil. ;)

I just won't fly.

[pcosmar]

This is just strange.

:confused:
How so?

[Deborah K]

Make the letters out of aluminum foil. ;)

I just won't fly.

Aluminum will hide my boobies?

[MelissaWV]

Aluminum will hide my boobies?

Sounds itchy and crinkly. It might make one look... wrinkled. I don't think I like that look.

[fisharmor]

Let's see..... we'll invent a job with an official job description that says "look at nude pictures of random air travelers all day", and then we'll act surprised when perverts end up applying?

Why the hell did it take three months to discover this?

[Deborah K]

Sounds itchy and crinkly. It might make one look... wrinkled. I don't think I like that look.

Well PCOsmar recommends aluminum letters as opposed to lead ones. I would put them on the outside of my bra and panties.

[ChaosControl]

You have the tools, eventually someone is going to put them to use.
Of course this will happen and it will happen often. It just wont be out in the open like this.

I'll never go through one of the damn scanners. To hell with the anti-privacy authoritarian nonsense.

[pcosmar]

You have the tools, eventually someone is going to put them to use.
Of course this will happen and it will happen often. It just wont be out in the open like this.

I'll never go through one of the damn scanners. To hell with the anti-privacy authoritarian nonsense.

They like it when you refuse.
Then they get to feel you up.
:(

[JoshLowry]

I'll never go through one of the damn scanners. To hell with the anti-privacy authoritarian nonsense.

But we all will still have pay taxes so the government can subsidize and bailout the airliners when people refuse to fly and make times tough.

:mad:

[Ninja Homer]

If people start accepting these at the airport, then next we'll be seeing them at government buildings, schools, and department stores. The time to resist is now.

[erowe1]

Laker, who faces the sack, was the first airport worker to be caught abusing the controversial new devices.


How is that abusing them? If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander.

[Semper Vigilans]

Pics or GTFO.


(Just wanted to say it before one of the guys here does.)

...and this is why amy is my favorite female in RPF's chat. And since she mish-mashed two internet sayings/memes together, she gets bonus points.

I can't say I'm surprised that this happened. Everybody knows that all guys want is to see some boobies. *shrugs*

[Old Ducker]

If you placed a sticker bearing insulting phrases over your privates, could they read it?

[Deborah K]

If you placed a sticker bearing insulting phrases over your privates, could they read it?

I say yes if the letters are in lead. pcosmar says aluminum will work. What say you?

[Anti Federalist]

I say yes if the letters are in lead. pcosmar says aluminum will work. What say you?

Yes, any metallic object would show in highly defined outline.

Hell you could use metallic glitter glued on, and that would work.

[Semper Vigilans]

I say yes if the letters are in lead. pcosmar says aluminum will work. What say you?

I'd trust pcosmar and use aluminum. I wouldn't want lead near my private parts. :D

[angelatc]

I was struck by this being "the first" report of abuse. Wasn't there a report of an Indian actor having pictures of his naughty parts circulated as a result of these scans?

Yes, and I believe that was in London also.

[Deborah K]

I'd trust pcosmar and use aluminum. I wouldn't want lead near my private parts. :D

Good point.

[pcosmar]

I say yes if the letters are in lead. pcosmar says aluminum will work. What say you?

Lead?
Well pencils have lead.
Strongly worded letters have not worked thus far,,

But lead?
Gee what else has lead in it?


:eek:

[Deborah K]

Yes, any metallic object would show in highly defined outline.

Hell you could use metallic glitter glued on, and that would work.

That would be even easier to do! Would it hide my private areas? Or would they still be able to see through it?

[Anti Federalist]

Lead?
Well pencils have lead.
Strongly worded letters have not worked thus far,,

But lead?
Gee what else has lead in it?


:eek:

Pete gets the "thread winner" award.

:D

[Anti Federalist]

That would be even easier to do! Would it hide my private areas? Or would they still be able to see through it?

Sure it would, but keep in mind they're gonna strip you after the fact, or refuse you access.

[Deborah K]

Sure it would, but keep in mind they're gonna strip you after the fact, or refuse you access.

The whole scenario conjures up a great utube image. :D

[pcosmar]

The whole scenario conjures up a great utube image. :D

And now for a tube musical interlude.

YouTube - TSA Gangstaz (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7AWw7t5zj0)

Seems appropriate here.

[ChaosControl]

They like it when you refuse.
Then they get to feel you up.
:(

I'll buy my own plane before I ride on an airline that has that crap.
I wanted to take pilot lessons anyway.

[Anti Federalist]

I'll buy my own plane before I ride on an airline that has that crap.
I wanted to take pilot lessons anyway.

I fly as well.

The TSA is extending it's reach to GA.:mad:

[Ninja Homer]

I'll buy my own plane before I ride on an airline that has that crap.
I wanted to take pilot lessons anyway.

YouTube - SPEED RECORD!!! $14,995 Flying Car!!! Fastest Practical Paramotor Trike, Powered Paraglider (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOftJT17AO0)

http://u-turnusa.com/paramotors/

[Deborah K]

And now for a tube musical interlude.

YouTube - TSA Gangstaz (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7AWw7t5zj0)

Seems appropriate here.

Wow! Watched about a minute and a half. A bit too vulgar for my sensibilities.

[pcosmar]

Wow! Watched about a minute and a half. A bit too vulgar for my sensibilities.

Yes,
But so is the TSA.

[Danke]

Thread title: "I love those gigantic t*ts"


Seriously though, I'm just not going to fly anymore.
Enough is enough. This is beyond ridiculous.


:confused:

[Semper Vigilans]

I don't plan on flying anytime soon, but if I do, I plan to wear loose pants and do the "windmill" for the TSA agents' benefit. :D

I wonder if I could design and market aluminum undergarments? Maybe make something out of a space blanket? Think mylar would reflect the scanner?

[Krugerrand]

Or, just wear a burqua and you can claim Muslim exemption:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=235714

[ChaosControl]

YouTube - SPEED RECORD!!! $14,995 Flying Car!!! Fastest Practical Paramotor Trike, Powered Paraglider (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOftJT17AO0)

http://u-turnusa.com/paramotors/

Okay, thats awesome. I'm seriously going to have to look into that.

[Anti Federalist]

For everybody:

As it stands right now in the US, you can still refuse a naked electronic scan, but you will be patted down and frisked.

[Deborah K]

For everybody:

As it stands right now in the US, you can still refuse a naked electronic scan, but you will be patted down and frisked.

I'd rather be sniffed by a bomb sniffing dog.

[pcosmar]

I'd rather be sniffed by a bomb sniffing dog.

:D
[ nope- not going there]

[jmdrake]

For everybody:

As it stands right now in the US, you can still refuse a naked electronic scan, but you will be patted down and frisked.

Well if enough people went for the time intensive pat down that it caused serious airport delays that might get their airlines to complain. Me I ain't flying. I seriously have no place I have to go that bad.

[Anti Federalist]

Well if enough people went for the time intensive pat down that it caused serious airport delays that might get their airlines to complain. Me I ain't flying. I seriously have no place I have to go that bad.

Sadly, my line of work requires that I fly.

Damn sure my wife and kids aren't, though.

[amy31416]

:D
[ nope- not going there]

Damn Pete, you're getting downright politically correct on us. :p

[Brian4Liberty]

The same amount of "explosives" can be hidden in body cavities, male or female.

You see what's next...:mad:


Free colonoscopy with every purchase? :D

[Semper Vigilans]

Sadly, my line of work requires that I fly.

Are you gonna use my "propeller" idea? :D

[Ninja Homer]

Okay, thats awesome. I'm seriously going to have to look into that.

Looks fun, doesn't it!?

http://u-turnusa.com/paramotors/
It looks like they start at around $6000 without the trike (take off and land on your feet). It qualifies as an ultralight, so no license required. 9 liter fuel tank gets you 2-4 hours. I haven't figured it out, but it sounds like good mpg for flying. You can also cut the engine and just ride currents. Not the absolute fastest way to travel, but almost 50 mph as the crow flies is pretty good.

[A. Havnes]

Free colonoscopy with every purchase? :D

Nah, make it a full-blown enema.

[phill4paul]

Never have I been able to post this pic under more appropriate circumstances.

http://img.moronail.net/img/6/7/767.jpg

LOL. Me too. HA!

[Keller1967]

I was struck by this being "the first" report of abuse. Wasn't there a report of an Indian actor having pictures of his naughty parts circulated as a result of these scans?

Not to mention that it sets the standard of it only being abuse if a nasty comment is made.

It's abuse either way.

[american.swan]

If I had to go through one of these scanners, I'd be tempted to crack jokes about it.
"Sorry ma'am, I'm not pinup material". "Maybe I can get it up for the return photo."

[ChaosControl]

Looks fun, doesn't it!?

http://u-turnusa.com/paramotors/
It looks like they start at around $6000 without the trike (take off and land on your feet). It qualifies as an ultralight, so no license required. 9 liter fuel tank gets you 2-4 hours. I haven't figured it out, but it sounds like good mpg for flying. You can also cut the engine and just ride currents. Not the absolute fastest way to travel, but almost 50 mph as the crow flies is pretty good.

I'd need to try it before I buy one though, I'll see if I can find anything in my area.

[Trigonx]

Lead?
Well pencils have lead.
Strongly worded letters have not worked thus far,,

But lead?
Gee what else has lead in it?


:eek:


Pencils DO NOT have lead in them, it's called graphite. I thought that was common knowledge these days.

[Golding]

That was quick and predictable.

[pcosmar]

Pencils DO NOT have lead in them, it's called graphite. I thought that was common knowledge these days.

Frickin' pickyuney.
I know it is Graphite. Big Woop.
It was called Pencil lead when I was in school.
It is still called lead.
as in: "That will put lead in yer pencil"

It is still sold as pencil lead.
http://www.dickblick.com/categories/mechanicalpencils/


So, what? you want an award for knowing that it is a Graphite compound.

or were you just demonstrating that you have some superior knowledge?

Here's one.

Nitpick
To correct minutiae or find fault in unimportant details; to kvetch.

Someone will invariably nitpick about any spelling error posted to the forums.

[phill4paul]

Frickin' pickyuney.
I know it is Graphite. Big Woop.
It was called Pencil lead when I was in school.
It is still called lead.
as in: "That will put lead in yer pencil"

It is still sold as pencil lead.
http://www.dickblick.com/categories/mechanicalpencils/


So, what? you want an award for knowing that it is a Graphite compound.

or were you just demonstrating that you have some superior knowledge?

Here's one.

Honestly.. the lolest (I'm thinking loloest is higher than lol. I'm not sure. Maybe mega-lol? I don't know but it's up a bit from lol.) post I have seen on this forum.

If for anything else it is this


Frickin' pickyuney.

I'd add it to my sig but I'd exceed the capacity.

[amy31416]

...and this is why amy is my favorite female in RPF's chat. And since she mish-mashed two internet sayings/memes together, she gets bonus points.



Awww shucks...and thanks for noticing my meme-mash. :p

[bruce leeroy]

hmmmmmm........wonder if barbara striesand has taken any commercial flights lately?

[Mach]

I'm going to have to create a whole line of contemporary anti-scan clothing... I'll be rich, rich I tell yuh!

I can't believe no one has brought up the old X-Rays are bad for you thing, especially if you travel lots... could you imagine getting a full body light X-Ray every coupla days for many, many, many days and years with no end in sight?

Oh, your government says it's not bad for you, sorry...... sorrry... sorry everyone... sorry 'bout that.

[Sandman33]

But we all will still have pay taxes so the government can subsidize and bailout the airliners when people refuse to fly and make times tough.

:mad:

Aint that the truth.

Anyway, if we quit flying they still win. Even easier to keep track of a population that never moves:D

And even if everyone decided to use trains instead.....they'd start putting the body scanners in the trains too.......and they'd send in another underwear bomber on a train just to sell it to the public.

And they'd buy it...twice.

[jmdrake]

Aint that the truth.

Anyway, if we quit flying they still win. Even easier to keep track of a population that never moves:D

And even if everyone decided to use trains instead.....they'd start putting the body scanners in the trains too.......and they'd send in another underwear bomber on a train just to sell it to the public.

And they'd buy it...twice.

We need to start our own airlines. Use VTOL technology so that we don't need airports and we can bypass the TSA altogether. Raise start up money through moneybombs. Use suppressed cold fusion technology for a power source so we don't have to worry about rising fuel costs and fuel taxes. Advertise via viral videos on YouTube. I'm only halfway joking here.