PDA

View Full Version : Commenting on the different "rights"




Uncle Emanuel Watkins
03-04-2010, 03:10 PM
When something is politically right, it is deemed officially so by legal precedent.
When something is naturally right, it is deemed so unalienably in the conscience (by way of it literally reducing down physically to it).
When something is rationally right, it is deemed so in the mind through the use of dialectics or "Truth engines (as raw data is inputted, a quality definition is outputted)"
When something is scientifically right, it is deemed so in the mind through the combination of observable and theoretical evidence.
When something is spiritually right, is is deemed so by a chosen vessel such as the Prophet Moses or the Apostle Paul who were raised up by the Holy Trinity, the Almighty, or the very Fullness of Jesus Christ Himself.

As a result,
When something is deemed politically effective, it is deemed profittable as in the subordinate parts of a nation work symbiotically with the governing parts for the benefit of the whole. A sick nation becomes parasitic in comparison because only certain parts within it benefit by keeping the whole body sick.
When something is a natural law, it is declared true in deep theory though the apparent nature of the reality created, the metaphysical, deceives the senses into thinking otherwise. Sir Isaac Newton thought that everyone used the math he was using. It wasn't until later on that he realized his math was unique. That math brought Newton to thinking of how reality might work by way of gravity in deep theory against what was clearly shown to work in nature. This clear and observable way deceived Aristotle into thinking gravity did not exist.
When something is deemed rational, it clearly defines terms. While there was lots of knowledge in Greece before the time of the Zenith of Greek philosophy, it went undefined perpetuated by poets who scoffed at virtue and Sophists who scoffed at the existence of an ideal Truth.
When something is scientifically beneficial, it is substantiated by the evidence while anomalies are explained. While Darwin was weak in math and logic, he is considered by many to be the greatest scientist since Aristotle because he withheld conclusions until anomalies were explained.
When something is Spiritual, it is substantiated by the Revelation of the Holy Spirit. While the Old Testament cheats those born without the ability to follow after the law, the New Testament rewards those who are cheated as, in their suffering without the law, they live the Word.