Ron Paul 2012 online poll, losing to Sarah Palin

[qwerty]

http://dailypaul.com/node/126097

Barack Obama - 12.0%
Bobby Jindal - 1.6%
Hillary Clinton - 3.5%
Mike Huckabee - 11.4%
Mitt Romney - 9.1%
Newt Gingrich - 3.7%
Ron Paul - 18.4%
Sarah Palin - 23.3%
None of the above - 17.0%
Total Responses - 970

[moostraks]

Barack Obama - 10.9%
Bobby Jindal - 1.5%
Hillary Clinton - 3.3%
Mike Huckabee - 10.4%
Mitt Romney - 8.3%
Newt Gingrich - 3.4%
Ron Paul - 24.4%
Sarah Palin - 21.8%
None of the above - 16.0%
Total Responses - 1074

[hillertexas]

voted:

Barack Obama - 10.7%
Bobby Jindal - 1.5%
Hillary Clinton - 3.2%
Mike Huckabee - 10.3%
Mitt Romney - 8.2%
Newt Gingrich - 3.4%
Ron Paul - 25.3%
Sarah Palin - 21.5%
None of the above - 15.9%
Total Responses - 1089

[catdd]

Rp 27
sp 20.9

[Jeros]

Ronpaulforums, expert spamming since 2007...

[johngr]

Ronpaulforums, expert spamming since 2007...

Rather loose definition of "spamming" you're using there.

[zach]

Ronpaulforums, expert spamming since 2007...

Our highly-intelligent basement bots always give us that boost of confidence.

[KCIndy]

Voted! :)

Barack Obama - 9.6%
Bobby Jindal - 1.2%
Hillary Clinton - 2.9%
Mike Huckabee - 9.3%
Mitt Romney - 7.4%
Newt Gingrich - 2.9%
Ron Paul - 33.5%
Sarah Palin - 19.0%
None of the above - 14.0%

Total Responses - 1289


LOL at Newt's 2.9% :p

[pacelli]

He's not losing anymore. Back off before they say hackers did it.

[bunklocoempire]

Barack Obama - 9.6%
Bobby Jindal - 1.2%
Hillary Clinton - 2.9%
Mike Huckabee - 9.2%
Mitt Romney - 7.3%
Newt Gingrich - 2.9%
Ron Paul - 33.9%
Sarah Palin - 19.0%
None of the above - 13.9%
Total Responses - 1298


Bunkloco

[HOLLYWOOD]

Check this little "FIX" in for 2012 Republican Presidential Candidates... where's Ron? far right

http://race42008.com/2010/02/18/tucker-carlson-stop-calling-them-the-mainstream-media/#comment-724449

http://i533.photobucket.com/albums/ee332/McLieberman/GOP_Rigged_2012_Presidential_Candid.jpg

[qwerty]

Barack Obama - 9.5%
Bobby Jindal - 1.2%
Hillary Clinton - 2.9%
Mike Huckabee - 9.2%
Mitt Romney - 7.3%
Newt Gingrich - 2.9%
Ron Paul - 34.2%
Sarah Palin - 18.9%
None of the above - 13.9%
Total Responses - 1310

[speciallyblend]

34.4% Ron Paul

[Justin D]

34.7%

[Jeros]

Rather loose definition of "spamming" you're using there.

Maybe not spamming, but I don't think anybody disagrees that Ron Paul supporters influence non random polls beyond the point of reality. If non random polls were accurate, Ron Paul would be president!

[purplechoe]

Maybe not spamming, but I don't think anybody disagrees that Ron Paul supporters influence non random polls beyond the point of reality. If non random polls were accurate, Ron Paul would be president!

Ron Paul has poeple on his side that are passionate and very active compared to the rest of the candidates... that's all... the rest of them are jealous...

YouTube - Ron Paul gets some love from Hillary Clinton 04/22/2009 CSPAN (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrpKS5aa4GU)

[Jeros]

Ron Paul has poeple on his side that are passionate and very active compared to the rest of the candidates... that's all... the rest of them are jealous...

YouTube - Ron Paul gets some love from Hillary Clinton 04/22/2009 CSPAN (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrpKS5aa4GU)

That's true, and I actually don't use the phrase "expert spammers" in a derogatory way. It was more of an ironic or sarcastic way. That was never my point though. My point was that non-random polls that include Ron Paul are inaccurate because of that passion. I would guess that the number that was posted by the initial poster is a better indicator of reality than the last number posted.

[RM918]

That's true, and I actually don't use the phrase "expert spammers" in a derogatory way. It was more of an ironic or sarcastic way. That was never my point though. My point was that non-random polls that include Ron Paul are inaccurate because of that passion. I would guess that the number that was posted by the initial poster is a better indicator of reality than the last number posted.

You're assuming we're the only ones that do it. If the poll includes people coming there for their candidate, isn't there being more of us sort of the point in the poll, to measure that?

[Jeros]

You're assuming we're the only ones that do it. If the poll includes people coming there for their candidate, isn't there being more of us sort of the point in the poll, to measure that?

I never said the supporters of other candidates don't do it. Some might, but....


Ron Paul has poeple on his side that are passionate and very active compared to the rest of the candidates... that's all... the rest of them are jealous...

Are you telling me that 35% of Americans who are going to vote Republican would vote for Ron Paul today among all those other candidates? I would guess it is closer to half that. That is nothing to laugh at, and I'm sure the movement will continue to grow, but lets not kid ourselves here. He might do better if only activists voted, or only Texans, but the majority of Americans are still doorknob dumb.

[cpike]

Now lets just do this for the 2012 primaries.