robert9712000
02-14-2010, 05:22 PM
After watching the interview with glenn beck and seeing some videos on debra medina's stances i was disturbed mostly by glenn becks additude towards her.
In the interview she did kind of hesitate on the question which would make one think she might have had some opinions on the 911 deal that she knew probably wouldn't jive with mainstream and was caught off guard by his question and didnt know how to quickly address it properly.
While i personally think that our government played no role in the 911 attacks,i think they brought it upon the American people inadvertently through there meddling in other country s affairs and there incompetence in intelligence gathering due to the traffic jam of bureaucracy they create in the simplest of tasks.I also think they took advantage of the fear at the time to push agendas they knew might otherwise have resistance too.Which might have been what she was eluding too when she said there were some good questions that were asked.
The thing that troubled me most wasnt her response to the question which to me came off as being sincere,maybe not as well spoken as the average politician but im not gonna hold it against her.Her job is to uphold the constitution not to give speeches.
The part that bothered me was glenn becks reaction to her response.He came across as very quick to judge and disrespectful in the way he treated her especially because from what ive seen. she comes across as one of the few politicians that puts personal liberty and freedom as the cornerstone of her beliefs in what she says.
So the fact that he so quickly jumped all over her makes him look like a hypocrite because he always came across as a person looking for truth regardless whatever that might reveal but after seeing that, he cant be sincerely looking to know truth or else he wouldn't have been so rash to judgment.
i actually liked watching glenn beck but this bummed me out because it seems every time i see someone that might be a voice for the little guy , im let down. Now dont take that statement wrong .Ron Paul i think is one of the most respectable people ive seen in office and he gave me hope that there can be people in politics that cant be corrupted by Washington
To me though he cant do it all on his own .While he fights the battle in Washington i think we also need a voice in the media that can be trusted that sincerely desires to want to know truth and believes in individual freedom and liberty.
So my question is,Are there any truly sincere liberty lovers in the media?
In the interview she did kind of hesitate on the question which would make one think she might have had some opinions on the 911 deal that she knew probably wouldn't jive with mainstream and was caught off guard by his question and didnt know how to quickly address it properly.
While i personally think that our government played no role in the 911 attacks,i think they brought it upon the American people inadvertently through there meddling in other country s affairs and there incompetence in intelligence gathering due to the traffic jam of bureaucracy they create in the simplest of tasks.I also think they took advantage of the fear at the time to push agendas they knew might otherwise have resistance too.Which might have been what she was eluding too when she said there were some good questions that were asked.
The thing that troubled me most wasnt her response to the question which to me came off as being sincere,maybe not as well spoken as the average politician but im not gonna hold it against her.Her job is to uphold the constitution not to give speeches.
The part that bothered me was glenn becks reaction to her response.He came across as very quick to judge and disrespectful in the way he treated her especially because from what ive seen. she comes across as one of the few politicians that puts personal liberty and freedom as the cornerstone of her beliefs in what she says.
So the fact that he so quickly jumped all over her makes him look like a hypocrite because he always came across as a person looking for truth regardless whatever that might reveal but after seeing that, he cant be sincerely looking to know truth or else he wouldn't have been so rash to judgment.
i actually liked watching glenn beck but this bummed me out because it seems every time i see someone that might be a voice for the little guy , im let down. Now dont take that statement wrong .Ron Paul i think is one of the most respectable people ive seen in office and he gave me hope that there can be people in politics that cant be corrupted by Washington
To me though he cant do it all on his own .While he fights the battle in Washington i think we also need a voice in the media that can be trusted that sincerely desires to want to know truth and believes in individual freedom and liberty.
So my question is,Are there any truly sincere liberty lovers in the media?