Some Press for our guy

[zMtLlC]

Some good, some bad, but it's good to get his name out there. Some of these have been posted here before, but here are some that I found:

Dailt Texan (negative) (http://media.www.dailytexanonline.com/media/storage/paper410/news/2007/06/06/Opinion/Ron-Pauls.Many.Faces-2912151.shtml)

PR Web (very positive) (http://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/6/prweb529433.htm)

Arizona Wildcat (somewhat positive) (http://media.wildcat.arizona.edu/media/storage/paper997/news/2007/06/06/Opinions/A.Genuine.Conservative.May.Split.Gop.Ranks-2912341.shtml)

In other news, my letter to the editor about the Paul-Giuliani exchange will be printed in my local paper. :D

[Thor]

Some good, some bad, but it's good to get his name out there. Some of these have been posted here before, but here are some that I found:

Dailt Texan (negative) (http://media.www.dailytexanonline.com/media/storage/paper410/news/2007/06/06/Opinion/Ron-Pauls.Many.Faces-2912151.shtml)


While I see how that could be read as negative, I found it quite positive. Not what the author intended, but this was good..

"The truth is, Paul's main appeal comes not from the candidate himself, but from the lack of a real alternative to Republicans, who obstinately march on in Iraq despite overwhelming violence, and Democrats who enable such incompetence with empty legislative posturing. While major figures in both parties brazenly ignore the will of a supermajority of Americans, Paul is there to pick up the slack, promising a quick end to the war. Paul appears to be the only politician who "gets it," and his brutal honesty is a refreshing respite from the sanctioned brutality brought on by the United States' continuing occupation of Iraq."

[zMtLlC]

While I see how that could be read as negative, I found it quite positive. Not what the author intended, but this was good..

"The truth is, Paul's main appeal comes not from the candidate himself, but from the lack of a real alternative to Republicans, who obstinately march on in Iraq despite overwhelming violence, and Democrats who enable such incompetence with empty legislative posturing. While major figures in both parties brazenly ignore the will of a supermajority of Americans, Paul is there to pick up the slack, promising a quick end to the war. Paul appears to be the only politician who "gets it," and his brutal honesty is a refreshing respite from the sanctioned brutality brought on by the United States' continuing occupation of Iraq."

I thought it was pretty positive when I first started reading it, but the last few paragraphs show that the writer feels that Paul is not the candidate for America, as I think he directly says.

[Thor]

I agree the writer is not pro-Paul. But I saw a lot of positive in is column, even though he probably did not mean it.