johnwk
02-09-2010, 09:23 PM
How can Sarah Palin campaing for John McCain’s reelection when McCain’s voting record is not in harmony with what Sarah Palin says she supports when speaking to her audiences? As a matter of fact, McCain’s record seems to represent everything Sarah says she is against!
What I can’t resolve in my mind is Sarah Palin saying we must stick to our Constitution and the principles under which it was adopted, which the tea party movement is all about, and then Palin promising to campaign for McCain’s reelection who has repeatedly used his vote in the Senate to subvert our Constitution.
We know McCain tries and has been very successful in reaching across the aisle to give aid and comfort to our progressive domestic enemies.
McCain reached across the aisle in an attempt to give aid and comfort in the form of amnesty to those who have invaded our borders.
He reached across the aisle to successfully expand the iron fist of the federal government’s unconstitutional federal department of education which progressives use to indoctrinate our nation’s younger generation’s minds and train them to be good little progressives, and educate them to how sweet it is for Billy to have two mommies, rather than teaching them the three Rs.
McCain also tried to reach across the aisle to assist progressives with the despotic McCain-Feingold Campaign Reform Act, more appropriately dubbed the incumbent full employment act designed to infringe upon freedom of political speech and preclude the American people‘s right, and especially right to life groups, from airing political ads which mentioned the name of a member of Congress and their voting record 60 days before an election. What part of shall make no law did McCain not understand?
McCain has also tried to reach across the aisle to assist progressive gun grabbers in their attack on the Tenth Amendment with regard to the people’s right to keep and bear arms, one example being supporting federal legislation making it a crime for a gun owner to travel through a school zone with a firearm, another example being McCain sponsoring an amendment to S. 1805 that would effectively outlaw the private sale of firearms at gun shows.
And what about McCain’s reaching across the aisle to assist progressives plundering our federal treasury with his support of the Stem Cell Research Act of 2007 and its federally-funded research? Were our founding fathers not clear in the specific manner in which Congress may promote the progress of Science? Did they not write in crystal clear language that Congress shall have power:
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries
What part of by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries did McCain not understand?
In addition to the above listed times McCain used his vote to subvert our Constitution, let us not forget he is also in favor of cap and tax and even once stated “I don‘t know how any conservative cannot support cap and trade“, and, McCain also opposes drilling in ANWR.
And, it doesn’t stop here. McCain is also just fine with closing Gitmo, against using water-boarding in the interests of our national security, and, he voted for an $850 BILLION bailout for banks and car manufactures, which was filled with pork and special interest earmarks. I thought McLiar was against pork and earmarking? McCain also championed a further plundering our national treasury for $300 BILLION to buy failed mortgages rather than have the free market place work its magic.
One writer put it this way:
Sarah Palin: Where is Your Loyalty to Alaskans and Conservatives? (http://www.redcounty.com/sarah-palin-where-your-loyalty-alaskans-and-conservatives/36108)
By Thomas Lamb | 01/24/10 | 08:32 PM EDT
Now since Senator McCain never changed his stance on opening ANWR (even when Sarah Palin was his V.P. pick), you have to question his willingness to change his stance (if McCain does change, it will be because his opponent J.D. Hayworth has pushed him in that direction on opening ANWR not Sarah Palin) with Sarah Palin's endorsement.
Moreover, since there is a challenger that fits the conservative/Tea Party movement, McCain becomes the political enemy to the movement. And by Palin supporting McCain, she is supporting an enemy to that movement and by de facto, becomes the enemy.
To argue against this fact would be foolish.
How can Sarah Palin, in good conscious, campaign for McCain’s reelection who has repeatedly violated his primary directive which is stated as follows:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution
I think the Washington sharks have deluded Sarah and mesmerized her with the monetary fortunes which can be had for those who play the Establishment’s game. But the unanswered question is, how can Sarah look her children in the eye when they will pay the price?
JWK
We are here today and gone tomorrow, but what is most important is what we do in between, and is what our children will inherit and remember us by.
What I can’t resolve in my mind is Sarah Palin saying we must stick to our Constitution and the principles under which it was adopted, which the tea party movement is all about, and then Palin promising to campaign for McCain’s reelection who has repeatedly used his vote in the Senate to subvert our Constitution.
We know McCain tries and has been very successful in reaching across the aisle to give aid and comfort to our progressive domestic enemies.
McCain reached across the aisle in an attempt to give aid and comfort in the form of amnesty to those who have invaded our borders.
He reached across the aisle to successfully expand the iron fist of the federal government’s unconstitutional federal department of education which progressives use to indoctrinate our nation’s younger generation’s minds and train them to be good little progressives, and educate them to how sweet it is for Billy to have two mommies, rather than teaching them the three Rs.
McCain also tried to reach across the aisle to assist progressives with the despotic McCain-Feingold Campaign Reform Act, more appropriately dubbed the incumbent full employment act designed to infringe upon freedom of political speech and preclude the American people‘s right, and especially right to life groups, from airing political ads which mentioned the name of a member of Congress and their voting record 60 days before an election. What part of shall make no law did McCain not understand?
McCain has also tried to reach across the aisle to assist progressive gun grabbers in their attack on the Tenth Amendment with regard to the people’s right to keep and bear arms, one example being supporting federal legislation making it a crime for a gun owner to travel through a school zone with a firearm, another example being McCain sponsoring an amendment to S. 1805 that would effectively outlaw the private sale of firearms at gun shows.
And what about McCain’s reaching across the aisle to assist progressives plundering our federal treasury with his support of the Stem Cell Research Act of 2007 and its federally-funded research? Were our founding fathers not clear in the specific manner in which Congress may promote the progress of Science? Did they not write in crystal clear language that Congress shall have power:
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries
What part of by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries did McCain not understand?
In addition to the above listed times McCain used his vote to subvert our Constitution, let us not forget he is also in favor of cap and tax and even once stated “I don‘t know how any conservative cannot support cap and trade“, and, McCain also opposes drilling in ANWR.
And, it doesn’t stop here. McCain is also just fine with closing Gitmo, against using water-boarding in the interests of our national security, and, he voted for an $850 BILLION bailout for banks and car manufactures, which was filled with pork and special interest earmarks. I thought McLiar was against pork and earmarking? McCain also championed a further plundering our national treasury for $300 BILLION to buy failed mortgages rather than have the free market place work its magic.
One writer put it this way:
Sarah Palin: Where is Your Loyalty to Alaskans and Conservatives? (http://www.redcounty.com/sarah-palin-where-your-loyalty-alaskans-and-conservatives/36108)
By Thomas Lamb | 01/24/10 | 08:32 PM EDT
Now since Senator McCain never changed his stance on opening ANWR (even when Sarah Palin was his V.P. pick), you have to question his willingness to change his stance (if McCain does change, it will be because his opponent J.D. Hayworth has pushed him in that direction on opening ANWR not Sarah Palin) with Sarah Palin's endorsement.
Moreover, since there is a challenger that fits the conservative/Tea Party movement, McCain becomes the political enemy to the movement. And by Palin supporting McCain, she is supporting an enemy to that movement and by de facto, becomes the enemy.
To argue against this fact would be foolish.
How can Sarah Palin, in good conscious, campaign for McCain’s reelection who has repeatedly violated his primary directive which is stated as follows:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution
I think the Washington sharks have deluded Sarah and mesmerized her with the monetary fortunes which can be had for those who play the Establishment’s game. But the unanswered question is, how can Sarah look her children in the eye when they will pay the price?
JWK
We are here today and gone tomorrow, but what is most important is what we do in between, and is what our children will inherit and remember us by.