PDA

View Full Version : JBS: We are Attacked for What We are Doing Right




FrankRep
02-07-2010, 11:44 PM
We are Attacked for What We are Doing Right (http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5811-ceo-february-2010-we-are-attacked-for-what-we-are-doing-right)


Art Thompson, CEO | John Birch Society - Newsletter (http://www.jbs.org/)
February 2010


Many members have seen one or more of the recent attacks aimed at The John Birch Society by MSNBC commentator Rachel Maddow.

The first episode consumed over eight minutes and was generally based on the absurd notion that a communist conspiracy never existed — except in the minds of John Birch Society members. The second attack was the same, only this time it was the threat of a New World Order that was ridiculed.

Some who were exposed to this perspective would now fall for it because the media have chosen to hide the fact of communist growth and influence in the years since the staged fall of the Berlin Wall. This is a major portion of the Insider plan to lull the American people to sleep regarding a danger that really exists.

KGB Propaganda Is Still With Us

Lest one believes that the fall of the Berlin Wall and the “collapse of communism” were not planned and implemented by the Soviet Union’s KGB, we ask you to read Anatoly Golitsyn’s book, New Lies For Old: The Communist Strategy of Deception and Disinformation (http://www.shopjbs.org/index.php/new-lies-for-old.html), written five years prior to the events. Therein, he outlined the KGB strategy in detail and said that it had been a plan in the making for years.



http://www.foundations-of-liberty.org/images/golitsyn_sm.jpg (http://www.shopjbs.org/index.php/new-lies-for-old.html)
New Lies For Old: The Communist Strategy of Deception and Disinformation
http://www.shopjbs.org/index.php/new-lies-for-old.html


Anatoly Golitsyn was in a position to know. His career in Soviet intelligence included four years in the KGB think tank before defecting to the West.

As a result of this strategy implemented as part of the overall Insider plan to subjugate all of humanity, a great majority of Americans have never experienced a “communist threat.” The Insiders took one step back and produced a generation that looks to the wars against communism in Korea and Vietnam as ancient history, particularly those born after 1970. And, with people having very short-term memories, communism has become “out of sight and out of mind” with important help from the government schools and, especially, from the mass media.

It is very hard for most people to see either the problems created by the Council on Foreign Relations or those associated with communism. With tight Insider control over most of the media, the people are allowed only to see and read what their enemies give them. No Insider or any Insider wannabe stands up and says, “Look at me. I’m a communist,” or “Watch me carry out the designs of the CFR.” Let me cite an example from my own experience to demonstrate the ties between international socialism and the media, at least in the philosophical if not the actual sense.

Frank Krasnowski for many years served as the head of the very radical Trotskyite communist organization, the Washington state Socialist Workers Party. His son Marc led its youth arm, the Young Socialist Alliance (YSA). The two were very much involved in the violent turmoil in the 1960s and 1970s that played out in the streets of Seattle. While Marc was in college as a journalism student, his YSA controlled the student body organization at the University of Washington with the help of key faculty and well-trained student activists.

After graduation, Marc went to work for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, one of Seattle’s major newspapers. I believe that he even became its city editor for a time. Then he went to work as a journalist in the Midwest, finally ending back where he started, becoming the Communications Director for the Northwest Energy Coalition, an 85-plus member group of environmental and civic organizations, utilities and businesses.

Marc Krasnowski is only one example of how radical socialists work their way into media and media-related positions to gain influence, not only over the public but also over opinion molders. The amazing part of this story is that Marc has never really hidden his roots. What he has accomplished is an incredible example of the acceptance of this anti-constitutional attitude in the professional world.

Communists do not door-bell. They work on opinion molders or in areas of influence. For the most part, they hide the fact that they are communists or militant socialists.

Hoover Had It Right

It is difficult for people to believe that a conspiracy exists when it is not obvious. This is especially true when the conspiracy is quite large, well-organized, and disciplined sufficiently to remain out of the sight of an untrained eye. F.B.I. Director J. Edgar Hoover put it this way in the August 1956 issue of the Elks Magazine: “We must face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism are being steadily advanced.... No one who truly understands what it really is can be taken in by it. Yet the individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.”

As a result of the work of men like Marc Krasnowski, multiplied by hundreds or even thousands, freedom began rapidly deteriorating in the middle of the 20th Century. But there was an awakening about what was happening. It was rooted not simply in a movement that opposed communism; it was one that understood the principles of liberty and the wiles of the conspiratorial enemy. And it also had the determination to inform the American people about what was happening and rally them into action to save our wonderful heritage.

The Insiders, as well as their communist cadres, understood that this restoration movement was spearheaded by the fledgling The John Birch Society. The collectivists had always been able to defeat their enemies through the use of a smear campaign with a great deal of help from their allies in the print and electronic media. But they must have recognized that such a tactic might no longer work due to the structure of the new JBS organization. Such an opposition to collectivist schemes as the JBS had never before been formed in human history.

Step-by-Step Smear

So, as they started to smear The John Birch Society, they likewise started to formulate plans for other ways to defeat their opposition in case they weren’t able to stop the new anti-communist movement.

First, they had to build a faux anti-communist movement, one which would take on the trappings of anti-communism but sustain their plan for a New World Order. They fulfilled this need by using their invisible connections in the media to create and promote the neoconservative movement founded by Trotskyites (international socialists) who now claimed to be ex-Trotskyites.

Neoconservative members of the Council on Foreign Relations and others beguiled the faint-hearted into involving themselves in the respectable, responsible, and more comfortable neocon movement, avoiding The John Birch Society, which was under constant harassment by the media. And besides, there was less work for these individuals than membership in the Society would have asked of them.

Morality Necessary for Self-government

Likewise, a false front was formed to take care of the moral aspect of the opposition. Since the Society recognized that morality was of paramount importance in fighting both evil and collectivism, ad hoc committees were formed by the Society to combat abortion, sex education in the schools, drug abuse, pornography, etc. These ad hoc committees were busy exposing the fact that these various forms of immorality were being promoted by design and were intrinsically locked in with the communist conspiracy in order to debase the nation’s morality, a huge step on the road to establishing government control over all. A moral people will be self-governing; an immoral people invites restraint by government. Our country’s Founders knew this well.

John Adams claimed with good reason: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

This attitude also had to be addressed by the Insiders, and they did so by thrusting into the national limelight (through their control of the major media organs) and growing a new “Religious Right” movement they believed they could control. Of course, it appeared that this new religious-based movement was a step in the right direction.

The movement was focused on moral issues — and the liberal media were attacking it. However, the attacks simply served to stampede good people into a movement that offered false solutions along neoconservative lines; for instance, the constant call for moral issues to be made into federal law or amendments rather than state or local law. Federal law would ultimately lead to national police enforcement. The media attacks actually served to make “heroes” out of the media-designated leaders of the so-called silent majority in the minds of many.

Initially and then more so as time wore on, this new movement’s overriding purpose was to support the candidates of the Republican Party. Indeed, one of the primary organizations in this Religious Right phenomenon was helped substantially with seed money from the Senate Republican Campaign Committee.

My own experience within the Christian Right convinced me early on that it was largely controlled by the Insiders. I noted that while conservatives were given high praise, too many Council on Foreign Relations members and other one-worlders were always at the head table at their conferences and seminars.

True, here and there, good people formed organizations considered to be part of the Christian Right. But the overall direction has always been controlled by CFR types and their allies in the media. It wasn’t only what they said; it was even more what they didn’t say and what they didn’t do.

While containing a number of fine leaders, some of whom abandoned our Society to become part of this new Christian Right for the same reasons others had wandered into the neocon movement, never explained was how traditional morality is being undermined by a conspiracy as a strategy for creating moral anarchy followed by totalitarianism. Never exposed were the ties with communists and with other minions of the Insiders. Only rarely was the promotion of immorality shown to be a conspiratorial thrust at the very foundations of the American system of government. And the solution offered by these leaders was always the Republican Party.

Denying the Enemy’s Existence

Secondly, the strategy called for “killing” communism in the minds of the American people, the main message in Golitsyn’s book. Americans were to be lulled to sleep until it would be too late to stop the New World Order, the name for the communist goal of world government and socialism.

You have probably noticed that the media never even asks the question about what happened to all of the communists after the “collapse.” In country after country, these people simply changed their designation and are still leading promoters of international organization. Even if communism died (and it did not), the disciplined “former” communists did not perish.

In spite of all these tactics, our Society was able over the years to steadily create awareness in a sizeable number of the American people with understanding that had been absent for many decades. This understanding was beginning to seriously hamper the Insiders’ timetable.

The manner in which we were organized, the educational efforts of our members, and the willingness of people to involve themselves in action and to put feet underneath their rhetoric concerned the Insiders more than anything. For in the JBS program, they saw our organization’s potential to rally the American people. They knew that they could not bring the American people into submission if the people were aware of the dangers that lay ahead. Only in ignorance could the American people be subjugated.

What Makes Maddow Tick? — Fear

Back to Rachel Maddow: Due to the leftist/liberal/Insider dominance within the mass media and the short-term memory of so many Americans, she feels confident enough to ridicule The John Birch Society on her MSNBC program. Her style of reporting, however, has led to a steadily declining number of viewers. It remains to be seen if her dwindling audience will be more influential than the more than one million who have seen all or portions of our extremely popular DVD, Overview of America.

It is the growing influence of JBS that Maddow and her handlers fear. They have obviously been watching what we do. First she attacked us on her television program. We responded online to our audience. Then she aired another harangue for over nine minutes about our response. Obviously, she and her team are monitoring our website. Also, they have the capability, and we do also, of knowing just how many people are logging on to our site and it concerns them.

For members who are interested, we have archived the Maddow smear attacks and our responses on www.jbs.org (go to JBS.org and search for “maddow”). When you see these “back and forth” exchanges, you will get a sense of the dishonesty and bias that pervades the media. It is not something new; Americans have had to deal with similar smear campaigns since the beginning of our country. An extreme example from the past is Aurora, a publication issued during the Washington administration.



* Rachel Maddow Recycles Falsehoods Against the John Birch Society (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2602-rachel-maddow-recycles-falsehoods-against-the-john-birch-society)

* Rachel Maddow Exposes Her Youth, Inexperience, and Political Correctness (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2645-rachel-maddow-exposes-her-youth-inexperience-and-political-correctness)

* Rachel Maddow, Black Helicopters, and the New World Order (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2667-rachel-maddow-black-helicopters-and-the-new-world-order)

* Maddow Displays Dishonesty; Ignores Official Report About JBS (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2680-maddow-displays-dishonesty-ignores-official-report-about-jbs)



We have been expecting smear tactics to be aimed at us once again. Also, we have felt for a good while that other organizations would be formed to sidetrack the growing protest and constitutionalist movement rising all across the country. We think that the enemies of freedom planned to control these new organizations by co-opting them. But their plan is not working to their satisfaction. We await further developments that will help us to know what they next have in mind.

JBS Attacked Because of Success, Not Failure

Always remember that the smear tactic will be used against us not for our failures but because of our successes, and even more, the enormous potential possessed by JBS to change the course of history. This potential has only partially been realized.

Sunshine patriots and arm-chair gripers never seem to understand that a comfort zone can’t exist if we mean business every step of the way. The enemies of our Constitution and our nation’s independence know that we do mean business, and they will not be comfortable until they see us neutralized.

They are a long distance from achieving the amount of control needed to simply issue an order to suppress our efforts. Currently, there are too many obstacles in their way to be able to do that. But no one should relax with the thought that our enemies would never implement such plans.

On the day I am writing this, an early morning television program has told its audience that it was the Internet that helped radicalize the recent would-be bomber aboard the airplane into Detroit from Schipol Airport in Amsterdam. If enough people believe that it is the Internet that radicalizes people, then the use of the Internet can be denied to government-designated organizations — and then to others.

It would seem reasonable to deny Internet use to would-be terrorists. But let’s recall that officials in the Department of Homeland Security have already labeled constitutionalists, pro-lifers, and Iraq War veterans as potential terrorists. Yes, they had to back away from such an outrageous charge. But they initially targeted several categories of Americans that are hated by the communists. That any government official would have made such a charge does not bode well for the First Amendment, or for the rest of the Constitution for that matter.

Likewise we read and hear more and more concerning Internet security relative to our military and financial institutions. From hacking into the Pentagon, to monitoring the drones over Afghanistan, and to the activities of major banks, come stories about attempts to influence Americans into accepting nebulously described controls.

Now we see that the Obama administration is talking about a cyber treaty with Russia to protect our military capability. When has a treaty with Russia ever been in our favor?

Not to worry, Mr. Obama has appointed as Cybersecurity Czar a man named Howard Schmidt. He served similarly under George Bush. And we’re supposed to believe that there are substantial differences at the top of the Republican and Democratic parties. The more things change, the more they seem to remain the same.

The one overriding attitude possessed by Howard Schmidt is that he sees government as the only solution to all aspects of Internet security, whether it concerns the hacking into financial institutions, our military networks, or stopping terrorists.

First of all, it is the responsibility of the financial institutions to build systems that prevent hacking. This is likewise true of our military. Secondly, who gets to define who actually is a terrorist? Our government is so rife with crypto communists, socialists, and one-worlders that I feel certain our government’s definition of a terrorist would be so all encompassing that it would include any “anti-government” organizations, which is a government term for any group seeking to enforce the limitations contained in the Constitution.

The attempts to marginalize the constitutionalist movement — and along with it The John Birch Society — is part of a plan to have government not only clamp down on our use of the Internet but also place the names of key constitutionalist leaders on airline watch lists or no-travel lists. It seems obvious that these and other ways to block our ability to reach vast numbers of the American people will be employed if we don’t achieve sufficient strength.

Obama Violates the Constitution — Again

Another disturbing sign is that Mr. Obama has amended Executive Order No. 12425 so that Interpol will now be allowed to operate within the United States. This is another clear violation of the Constitution.

E.O. 12425 was originally signed by Ronald Reagan, giving certain privileges, exemptions, and immunities for Interpol to operate within the United States — with some restrictions. The Obama amendment action cancels these restrictions. Since Interpol is an enforcement arm of the UN’s International Criminal Court, this is an indication that the man who today occupies the White House has no problem with the ICC operating on American soil.

It may only be one step, but it can be an important one toward abrogating our Constitution. Keep in mind, one of the grievances outlined in our Declaration of Independence stated to the British king and the entire world the reasons for separating ourselves from the British Crown. One was: “He has combined with others to subject us to Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws....”

If the initial reports about this alteration of E.O. 12425 are correct, another grievance mentioned in the Declaration will be repeated: “...transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended Offenses.”

If we couple the changes in E.O. 12425 with the outrages coming out of the Department of Homeland Security, especially including the attitude about who domestic terrorists are, and add to these a number of other initiatives designed to control American citizens and businesses, it is hardly extreme to label all of it a blueprint for totalitarianism being rolled out before our very eyes.

And instead of sounding the alarm, the media fills giddy minds with pap including the latest extra-marital escapades of some degenerate in the entertainment or sports field.

Whether the Maddow attacks are a harbinger of things to come or only the personal vendetta of a would-be media star whose ratings are tumbling is unknown. However, we have seen a great deal of interest in our affairs by the New York Times, The Atlantic, and others over the past year. They made note of our existence but then backed off from any full-scale attack. On January 4, The New York Times published a prominently placed full-page ad touting the supposed excellence of reporting carried by MSNBC, including photos of Maddow along with those of similarly left-wing commentators Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman.

This reminds one of an attack dog that wants to bite but is held tightly on a leash. In our case, the initial attacks on us in the early 1960s began to produce less and less benefit for the Insiders, so the campaign against us that was proving to be counter-productive from the Insiders’ point of view ended as suddenly as it had started. There seems to be a reluctance to go too far too fast at this time.

The enemies of freedom face a dilemma. If they attack in an attempt to negate our influence with the hope of silencing us before they gain complete control of the Internet, we can use our web sites and other electronic opportunities to expose them. An important alternative open to them is to convince the American people of a need to exercise increasing control over the Internet supposedly to support our military and the financial infrastructure against hackers, and also depriving terrorists (whoever they are) of its use. They can make the Cybersecurity Czar a czar in every frightening sense of the term.

The communist Chinese already are doing this in cooperation with Google, a Council on Foreign Relations corporate member; however, Google may now be rethinking their involvement. Only time will tell.

If that point is ever reached, enough controls will be in place to stop any real opposition to government oppression, not just by The John Birch Society. They will, at first, allow non-effective opposition to function to give the trappings of openness on the Internet.

What the Maddows of the world never seem to understand is that if they are “honest” socialists, truly believing that the road to earthly paradise is through socialism, they should know that they will be some of the first victims of a government gone amok.

If history teaches us nothing else, it should show that totalitarians always eliminate almost immediately those who helped them come to power in the first place. Hitler had his Night of the Long Knives, Stalin his purges, and Mao his Cultural Revolution. The conspirators can never trust traitors, even those who helped them, since a traitor once can well be a traitor again.

Liberals who cannot tolerate government controls, and are too ignorant to realize that their own actions will bring about even more controls, are not fit to be part of a system that wears uniforms. They will be eliminated by the very forces they ignorantly helped come to power.

“Reformed” Socialists Rarely Shed Any Light

The internationalist socialist movement is rife with intellectuals who finally realized the errors of what they were doing. So they quit, writing books to expose the fact that socialism is not led by humanitarians, but by conspirators who want total power. The trouble with almost all of these tomes is that their authors were still socialists at heart and believers, not in conspiracy, but in mere intellectual error among those they were now denouncing. They regularly ended up sending a very confused message to the reader.

Our veteran members know that when we are attacked they should withhold judgment until they hear a factual response from JBS headquarters. In most cases today, the attacks are simply yellow journalism, using information that has been refuted in the past. But for every new generation, the forays against us appear to be the work of fresh attackers even though they contain the same tired smears. They affect some Americans simply because they have never previously heard what appears to be something new.

Likewise, when we publish a position on any subject, we have looked into the matter with great care beforehand. From time to time, we do come under attacks issued by well-meaning people who feel that we have not done our research well enough to know that what concerns them is correct and we are wrong. Honest individuals who are then given the whole story back off and some even apologize to us.

We are witnessing this pattern a little more than usual lately because there is so much disinformation being disseminated for the purpose of providing conservatives with dead end issues or positions that marginalize their effectiveness with opinion molders. Some of these initiatives are so well organized that they have all the appearances of being state-managed.

The Maddow smear showed the signs and placards held by recent protesters during the various demonstrations held around the country. The messages on some of these signs exhibited extremist views and, by innuendo, they were attributed to our Society. This has always been something we have worried about because these demonstrations and some of the messages seen on placards will be misunderstood by the general public. Too many Americans do not understand what a demonstrator is trying to say, or too many demonstrators make their point in a disrespectful manner. While there is much to protest, anyone taking part in a demonstration should never forget that, without care and good taste, the effect of their action on the general public — the uninformed American who must be persuaded, not insulted or maddened — can be counterproductive.

We live in a time when we have to be ready for a smear campaign and not allow ourselves to give enemies any ammunition to use against us. We must always conduct ourselves in a moral, ethical, and tasteful manner.

Take Heart: We’ve Got it Right!

While these thoughts may seem to be a tiny bit disheartening, they are intended to be quite the opposite. For we can take heart in the fact that we are attacked — for what we are doing right, not for what we are doing wrong. And we should certainly be encouraged because our potential to upset the plans of the Insiders is obviously worrying them.

If we allow ourselves to become demoralized, we will be defeated. And that too is as much a reason behind the smear campaign as it is to marginalize us in the eyes of American opinion molders.

Don’t let them get to you — ever.


SOURCE:
http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5811-ceo-february-2010-we-are-attacked-for-what-we-are-doing-right

FrankRep
02-08-2010, 01:09 AM
G. Edward Griffin Interview Of Yuri Bezmenov, ex-KGB defector


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RS8LA-5fmrs



Soviet Subversion of the Free World Press - 1984 ( 1:21:28 mins )
Google Video: http://bit.ly/azLitv


Yuri Bezmenov, a Russian born, KGB trained subverter tells about the influence of the Soviet Union on Western media and describes the stages of communist takeovers. This interview was conducted by G. Edward Griffin in 1984. This video has been remastered and is now available on DVD. See http://realityzone.com/bezmenov.html

american.swan
02-08-2010, 01:09 AM
So basically for the uninformed, the JBS is the "hidden" freedom network attacking the "hidden" CFR agenda.

FrankRep
02-08-2010, 01:26 AM
So basically for the uninformed, the JBS is the "hidden" freedom network attacking the "hidden" CFR agenda.

Ron Paul At the 50th Anniversary of John Birch Society


http://www.vimeo.com/19602654


On the Council on Foreign Relations:


http://www.shopjbs.org/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/5e06319eda06f020e43594a9c230972d/S/h/Shadows_of_Power_web.jpg (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0882791346/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=libert0f-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399349&creativeASIN=0882791346)

The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0882791346/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=libert0f-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399349&creativeASIN=0882791346)
by James Perloff



Does America have a hidden oligarchy? Is U.S. foreign policy run by a closed shop? What is the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)? It began in 1921 as a front organization for J.P. Morgan and Company. By World War II it had acquired unrivaled influence on American foreign policy. Hundreds of U.S. government administrators and diplomats have been drawn from its ranks - regardless of which party has occupied the White House. But what does the Council on Foreign Relations stand for? Why do the major media avoid discussing it? What has been its impact on America's past - and what is it planning for the future? (2008, 272pp, pb)

_____________________

Some News Articles:


Council On Foreign Relations
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/foreign-policy/1462


During his presidential campaign, Barack Obama consistently promised Americans “change” and such promises aren’t new to the voting public as was seen with Carter and his Trilateral Commission group, chief among these the CFR. by James Perloff


Hillary Clinton admits CFR control over Government Policy
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/1447


CFR President, Richard Haass, calls for the End of National Sovereignty of Nations
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=197325


Council on Foreign Relations: Forget Privacy, We Need to Spy More
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=206911


CFR Pushes Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST)
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/foreign-policy/1084


CFR Corporate Members Get Lion's Share of Bailout Funds
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/economy/commentary-mainmenu-43/915


Obama Picks Come From Same Old CFR Roster
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/555



Ron Paul talks about the Council on Foreign Relations


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NV_AML16tC8

Ron Paul exposes the Council on Foreign Relations


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BzpsNGWBVo

InterestedParticipant
02-08-2010, 01:34 AM
Some who were exposed to this perspective would now fall for it because the media have chosen to hide the fact of communist growth and influence in the years since the staged fall of the Berlin Wall. This is a major portion of the Insider plan to lull the American people to sleep regarding a danger that really exists.

How many lies can be woven into one paragraph? A master propagandist wrote this. It's an excellent illustration of technique. Too bad it reals them for what they are.


So basically for the uninformed, the JBS is the "hidden" freedom network attacking the "hidden" CFR agenda.

No, for the uninitiated they are yet just another vector in an endless spectrum that form opposition in an endless sea of manufactured dialectics.

Read Wormser's book on foundations and bogus nonprofit groups to get insight in to how the 'activist' scam works to waste your time and fill your head with more nonsensical noise.

FrankRep
02-08-2010, 01:57 AM
How many lies can be woven into one paragraph? A master propagandist wrote this. It's an excellent illustration of technique. Too bad it reals them for what they are.
A central bank (Federal Reserve), public government education, progressive income tax, centralization of government power.... Sounds like America is implementing the 10 Planks of The Communist Manifesto to me. (http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html)



No, for the uninitiated they are yet just another vector in an endless spectrum that form opposition in an endless sea of manufactured dialectics.

Read Wormser's book on foundations and bogus nonprofit groups to get insight in to how the 'activist' scam works to waste your time and fill your head with more nonsensical noise.

So far you've called G. Edward Griffin (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=195399&page=11&p=2172542), Judge Napolitano (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=225718&page=3&p=2485868), and John Birch Society (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=195399&page=11&p=2172542) all Controlled Opposition.

I'm just waiting for you to call Ron Paul Controlled Opposition next.

InterestedParticipant
02-08-2010, 10:14 AM
A central bank (Federal Reserve), public government education, progressive income tax, centralization of government power.... Sounds like America is implementing the 10 Planks of The Communist Manifesto to me. (http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html)
And JBS is serving its roles in facilitating this implementation. Read Hegel!!!!


So far you've called G. Edward Griffin (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=195399&page=11&p=2172542), Judge Napolitano (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=225718&page=3&p=2485868), and John Birch Society (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=195399&page=11&p=2172542) all Controlled Opposition.

I'm just waiting for you to call Ron Paul Controlled Opposition next.
You're a cultmember, servicing the needs of its cult leaders. Why don't you ever do your own independent research that is not guided by the directs of the cult?

theclip
02-08-2010, 10:27 AM
^ +1

InterestedParticipant
02-08-2010, 12:12 PM
Read something, anything, that the cult leaders have not suggested for your mind.

You know, this Communism crap that JBS talks about came from Marx & Engels, who got it from British Elites and Hegel, who got it by manipuating Kant who got it by manipulating Aristotle.
Ever thought of reading any of these guys? Does JBS recommend any of their work, given that they are so adamantly against "Communism"?




"It is the manipulative type of idealist who
will create the scientific society. Of such men, in
our own day, Lenin is the archetype."

Scientific Outlook
Bertrand Russell