"A little revolution is a good thing" by Pia Varma

[LibertyPulse.com]

http://libertypulse.com/article/1108

Video of Pia Varma speaking to a crowd of Revolution.

http://libertypulse.com/article/1108

[FrankRep]

Pia Varma at Mises.org

Lady Liberty
http://mises.org/daily/3763

Corporatist Pigs!
http://mises.org/daily/3761

Go for Capitalism or Go for Broke?
http://mises.org/daily/3762

From the Runways of Austria ...
http://mises.org/daily/3571

[LibertyPulse.com]

LibertyPulse has been linking her work for sometime... :)

Pia Varma Commercial

http://libertypulse.com/article/4060

To Be or Not to Be...a Gerbil on a Wheel! Pia Varma 2010?

http://libertypulse.com/article/2663

[LibertyPulse.com]

This is cool...

Your Freedom by Pia Varma

http://libertypulse.com/article/4062

[newbitech]

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UvNSDtL4Ts4/SyIhtGKQeEI/AAAAAAAAAIA/-Q-4hm1vIgo/s320/jaw_dropping_butch.jpg

I am moved.

What a speech. Wow..

[CaseyJones]

I am in love

[LibertyPulse.com]

Gonna interview Pia Varma soon will keep everyone update...

Kurt Wallace

[Uncle Emanuel Watkins]

http://libertypulse.com/article/1108

Video of Pia Varma speaking to a crowd of Revolution.

http://libertypulse.com/article/1108

Self evident -- Needing no expert to explain.
Unalienable -- Reducing beyond the mind's comprehension to be perceived by the human soul.
Revolution is not necessary, but is partisan politics. According to the political natural law declared by our Founding Fathers, the Truth is unalienable to the extent that it is bipartisanly American. So, forget about all this emotionalism about liberty, for that is a prerequisite of the natural law; likewise, forget about equality as that too is also a necessity.
You know, we could end up going round and round forever with endless political rallies bantying the supposed ideals of liberty and equality; but, as I've often stated in this forum, liberty for the sake of liberty is no better than slavery while equality for the sake of equality is no better than inequality.

[dr. hfn]

I wonder if she is on RPF?

[t0rnado]

I just looked at her Facebook. Ron Paul 2012, Peter Schiff, Ron Paul, Jim Rogers are pages she has joined, but she also joined the Rupert Murdoch, Dinesh D'Souza pages. The latter two are neocons, so I'm not too sure what to make of this.

[payme_rick]

The latter two are neocons, so I'm not too sure what to make of this.

guess there's nothing left to do other than to discredit her... forget about what she could offer, she's not perfect and that's the bottom line on here...

[CaseyJones]

Pia FTW!

[zach]

Truth triumphs.

[The Patriot]

I just looked at her Facebook. Ron Paul 2012, Peter Schiff, Ron Paul, Jim Rogers are pages she has joined, but she also joined the Rupert Murdoch, Dinesh D'Souza pages. The latter two are neocons, so I'm not too sure what to make of this.

I am not going to rag her for watching Fox. I don't think everyone who watches Fox is part of some conspiracy. My mother watches Fox News and supports Ron Paul. As for Dinesh, he is a strong Catholic. She could like him for the fact he is religious pundit and debates guys like Hitchens on religious issues.

[__27__]

I am not going to rag her for watching Fox. I don't think everyone who watches Fox is part of some conspiracy. My mother watches Fox News and supports Ron Paul. As for Dinesh, he is a strong Catholic. She could like him for the fact he is religious pundit and debates guys like Hitchens on religious issues.

Agreed. Even as an anarchist, I've been to a lecture by Dinesh and as a Christian I found him to be wonderful. Religion is not the enemy, government is. Just because someone is a devout Christian does not make them a neo-con.

[CaseyJones]

bump

[CaseyJones]

YouTube - Pia Varma an American Woman - Rebuilding the Republican Party (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySeqNN0NMHs)

[Cowlesy]

Well Pia blew it big time.

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/cityhall/Election_2010_Bob_Brady_Challenger_Booted_From_Bal lot.html

I recall back in 2007 when gearing up for Ron Paul's primary, the first thing we were concerned with was not getting primary votes, but BALLOT ACCESS. I believe it was Bradley in D.C. who reinforced the idea that if we were forced to collect signatures, that we needed to collect 4 to 5x (I believe) the number of signatures, meaning, if you need 1,000 sigs, you better collect 4,000-5,000. The reason for that is because the competing candidate (whether Primary candidate or General election candidate) will have their lawyers go name by name vs. the rolls of registered voters and X out everyone who can be disqualified (each party has their own rules, and the opposing parties know the rules).

Now while I sympathize with those lamenting on her Facebook page about "the system is corrupt" and "the rules are unfair," if you are going to solicit donations, and say you are going to run, you damn well better know how the Ballot Access process works for your race. What's the point of it all if you don't get on the ballot?

And then not showing up for court with the reasons "I did not go to court today because- 1. I was never served. 2. Regarding my petitions, as the endorsed candidate, I naively relied on the Republican City Committee to gather the bulk of my signatures." while a process server of the courts TESTIFIED in court today that "he served Varma with a copy of the court notice for the hearing last week as she entered the Center City offices of Fox 29 News, where she was to be interviewed about her candidacy" after "Kaplan [DNC Attorney] told Butler [Judge] he called Varma three times, sent her three e-mails and three text messages, advising her about the hearing," is totally unacceptable to me.

Nothing, nothing grinds my gears more when it is blatantly clear a person totally fucks up, and then just sticks their fingers in the ear going "la la la la i can't hear you" because they don't want to admit they botched the process.

She should write a thank-you note to the Judge for not assessing her court fines like the attorneys wanted to do.

[dr. hfn]

she can still get on the ballot though right? heh

[Cowlesy]

she can still get on the ballot though right? heh

I'm not sure. She came across all "about the individual and liberty" yet won't accept any blame for fucking up. Actually she says she "fucked up"...in trusting the Republican Committee members....---so again, not her fault, someone else's fault.

Whatever.

[libertyjam]

Yeah, the political machine in Philly would never chew up and spit out a political neophyte with some standard old strong arm tactics would they?