theseus51
10-05-2007, 07:25 PM
http://soundpolitics.com/archives/009356.html
Jim Geraghty also notes that Giuliani's camp didn't release their total number of donors. Bad sign. Through the end of the 2nd Quarter Giuliani was the most top-heavy fundraiser, with 61.5% of dollars contributed coming in the form of max checks. It seems clear Giuliani doesn't have the diversified national donor base one would expect of a national front runner, that's perhaps part of the reason his top finance staffer was recently dismissed.
---
Basically he wanted to increase the number of donors. It looks better to have 100,000 people giving an average of $100, than 10,000 people giving an average of $1,000. =)
Jim Geraghty also notes that Giuliani's camp didn't release their total number of donors. Bad sign. Through the end of the 2nd Quarter Giuliani was the most top-heavy fundraiser, with 61.5% of dollars contributed coming in the form of max checks. It seems clear Giuliani doesn't have the diversified national donor base one would expect of a national front runner, that's perhaps part of the reason his top finance staffer was recently dismissed.
---
Basically he wanted to increase the number of donors. It looks better to have 100,000 people giving an average of $100, than 10,000 people giving an average of $1,000. =)