DrNoZone
10-05-2007, 08:49 AM
They continue to do so, which infuriates me as a regular and longtime reader. Check out the article here (http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/10/05/gop/index.html) and then check out the letters in response to it; at least a few of the pro Ron Paul responses got marked as Editor's picks. I just sent mine in, here it is:
Salon denounces and belittles statesman Ron Paul once again (http://letters.salon.com/news/feature/2007/10/05/gop/permalink/310bf29c81580427456b081dce9645b2.html)
So taking a principled stand on the Constitution, seeing eye to eye with our Founding Fathers, and having the most integrity filled career on the Hill makes one a gadfly?
What is Salon so afraid of that they can't cover Ron Paul with the dignity and respect he deserves? Would your colleagues make fun of you on the playground, not let you sit at their table during lunch break, and paste you with spitballs during class?
A few weeks ago I responded (http://letters.salon.com/news/feature/2007/09/24/mackinac/permalink/90a0a298b08511610186ee6574df4740.html) to another article (http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/09/24/mackinac/index.html) and it too got marked as an Editor's pick. So why do they like our responses about Ron Paul, but they refuse to report fairly on him in their articles?
Salon denounces and belittles statesman Ron Paul once again (http://letters.salon.com/news/feature/2007/10/05/gop/permalink/310bf29c81580427456b081dce9645b2.html)
So taking a principled stand on the Constitution, seeing eye to eye with our Founding Fathers, and having the most integrity filled career on the Hill makes one a gadfly?
What is Salon so afraid of that they can't cover Ron Paul with the dignity and respect he deserves? Would your colleagues make fun of you on the playground, not let you sit at their table during lunch break, and paste you with spitballs during class?
A few weeks ago I responded (http://letters.salon.com/news/feature/2007/09/24/mackinac/permalink/90a0a298b08511610186ee6574df4740.html) to another article (http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/09/24/mackinac/index.html) and it too got marked as an Editor's pick. So why do they like our responses about Ron Paul, but they refuse to report fairly on him in their articles?