PDA

View Full Version : MA election returns thread.




klamath
01-19-2010, 07:09 PM
Figure people are going to be talking about this tonight:D

Neopaulitan
01-19-2010, 07:12 PM
What? There's an election in MA?
:p

FrankRep
01-19-2010, 07:15 PM
Current results:


R: 249,106 - 53%
D: 216,117 - 46%
L: 4,392 - 1%


http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/senate/results.html
http://www.drudgereport.com/

Mitt Romneys sideburns
01-19-2010, 07:16 PM
is this the one with the gay pornstar?

cradle2graveconservative
01-19-2010, 07:18 PM
Edit

Mitt Romneys sideburns
01-19-2010, 07:19 PM
As though it were a problem?

It is if you are running for a Republican seat

FrankRep
01-19-2010, 07:22 PM
Coakley adviser memo: D.C. Dems 'failed' Coakley

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0110/Coakley_adviser_memo_DC_Dems_faled_Coakley.html?sh owall#

TortoiseDream
01-19-2010, 07:23 PM
is this the one with the gay pornstar?

haha you crack me up MRS. we go at it in the off topic section, but you make good cracks.

mport1
01-19-2010, 07:23 PM
Who cares? A statist vs. a statist...

cradle2graveconservative
01-19-2010, 07:23 PM
Edit

Neopaulitan
01-19-2010, 07:25 PM
Preemptive indeed.

Charges of ballot tampering fly last minute in Massachusetts vote

"The Coakley campaign claims that a "serious violation" has taken place in the Massachusetts election, calling into question the validity of the election results even before the tally is in.

In a prepared statement, the campaign takes issue with pre-marked ballots being given to voters, claiming that in five instances they were marked in favor of Brown."



http://rawstory.com/2010/01/charges-ballot-tampering-fly-minute-massachusetts-vote/

FrankRep
01-19-2010, 07:25 PM
Joseph Kennedy - 1%

cradle2graveconservative
01-19-2010, 07:27 PM
Edit

cradle2graveconservative
01-19-2010, 07:29 PM
Edit

Cowlesy
01-19-2010, 07:31 PM
Brown's pulling away already.....boy the Dems are going to have a rough fall at this rate.

Pepsi
01-19-2010, 07:32 PM
what are the odds that her supporters did that to steal the election for her?

I remember a few elections ago that the poll workers here told us we had to use pens to vote with, when the ballot said only to use the pencils giveing.

Flash
01-19-2010, 07:42 PM
R: 0,169,808
d: 0,145,733

Lovecraftian4Paul
01-19-2010, 07:42 PM
Boston is already in and it didn't tilt heavily for Coakley. Brown is still at 53%. His percentage could go up a bit more for my liking, just to rub further salt in the Dem wounds. Let them know how pissed off this country is, and what's going to happen to them in November.

FrankRep
01-19-2010, 07:44 PM
A Recount will most likely happen. This is brutally close.

gls
01-19-2010, 07:53 PM
A Recount will most likely happen. This is brutally close.

Really? He's ahead by 7% with 40% reporting. It looks like he will win by a comfortable margin.

TCE
01-19-2010, 07:55 PM
Coakley's winning 59/40 in Boston with many more to go:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2010/by_county/MA_US_Senate_0119.html?SITE=AP&SECTION=POLITICS

FrankRep
01-19-2010, 07:55 PM
Really? He's ahead by 7% with 40% reporting. It looks like he will win by a comfortable margin.
We'll see I guess.

low preference guy
01-19-2010, 07:55 PM
Yep, big win. A nice monkey wrench for universal health care. Go Massachusetts!

tangent4ronpaul
01-19-2010, 07:59 PM
Boston is already in and it didn't tilt heavily for Coakley. Brown is still at 53%. His percentage could go up a bit more for my liking, just to rub further salt in the Dem wounds. Let them know how pissed off this country is, and what's going to happen to them in November.

Only 20% of boston is in and it's her strongest base. She's not got that much of a lead there.

Boston 54 of 254 12,290 17,983 313

-t

TCE
01-19-2010, 08:01 PM
Only 20% of boston is in and it's her strongest base. She's not got that much of a lead there.

Boston 54 of 254 12,290 17,983 313

-t

88/254 - Precincts Reporting
30,039 61% - Coakley
18,993 38% - Brown
480 1% - Kennedy

Flash
01-19-2010, 08:03 PM
R: 0,638,823
d: 0,563,214

Voltaire
01-19-2010, 08:04 PM
Perhaps Taxachusetts has gone insane?

TCE
01-19-2010, 08:05 PM
D: 607,073 46%

r: 694,897 53%

TCE
01-19-2010, 08:06 PM
Perhaps Taxachusetts has gone insane?

Referendum on health care, along with Coakley running a horrible campaign and Brown running a great one. It's still not over yet.

Neopaulitan
01-19-2010, 08:09 PM
Don't forget 13,502 for Kennedy.

Yeah. I know it's 1 stinkin % - but still. It's nice to know I wasn't the only Liberty Party vote today.

Lovecraftian4Paul
01-19-2010, 08:10 PM
Now, if only this wonderful blowback against the left will pick up steam and touch incumbents too. It may seem like a crazy dream now, but to see Pelosi hurled out of office this Fall would really crown the justice being done here tonight. But I won't get ahead of myself.

Brown winning by a good margin is like putting the horse's head on the Democratic Party's pillow. Message: STOP KILLING OUR COUNTRY...OR ELSE!

LibertyBrews
01-19-2010, 08:11 PM
Ted Kennedy is probably turning into a zombie now trying to dig himself out so he can kill the people in Massachusetts en masse.

FrankRep
01-19-2010, 08:12 PM
This should send a strong message to Obama.

tangent4ronpaul
01-19-2010, 08:12 PM
Interactive map is up here:

http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/senate/results.html

note that the middle of the state has largely not reported...

compare that with the map here that lists pledged voters to get a rough idea of support in various areas (though keep population density in mind...)

http://brownforussenate.com/voter-bomb

bottom line - a lot of strong Brown areas have not reported in... while Croakley's strong areas generally have reported in. This is looking like a widening win margin for Brown. :D

-t

sarahgop
01-19-2010, 08:12 PM
this is awesome!!

TCE
01-19-2010, 08:12 PM
Now, if only this wonderful blowback against the left will pick up steam and touch incumbents too. It may seem like a crazy dream now, but to see Pelosi hurled out of office this Fall would really crown the justice being done here tonight. But I won't get ahead of myself.

Brown winning by a good margin is like putting the horse's head on the Democratic Party's pillow. Message: STOP KILLING OUR COUNTRY...OR ELSE!

This was something of a referendum on the incumbent, the incumbent party if nothing else. She had the incumbent disadvantage, since she was using an incumbent as the cornerstone of her campaign, but she had none of the advantages, such as money and PAC/Lobbyist support.

catdd
01-19-2010, 08:12 PM
Just heard that brown is projected winner.

sarahgop
01-19-2010, 08:12 PM
we did it tangent!!

Pepsi
01-19-2010, 08:13 PM
Ted Kennedy is probably turning into a zombie now trying to dig himself out so he can kill the people in Massachusetts en masse.

They need to make a zombie movie were the zombies are members of Congress and the Founding Fathers fighting them off.

low preference guy
01-19-2010, 08:14 PM
It is over. More than 65% reported, Brown 7 points ahead.

Flash
01-19-2010, 08:16 PM
It's over.

Lovecraftian4Paul
01-19-2010, 08:20 PM
FYI, if you want to see some totally deranged crybabies, go on DemocraticUnderground right now. There are seriously liberals who now believe Brown and Republicans somehow stole the election...even though it's a heavily "blue" state with machinery controlled by the Democrats.

FrankRep
01-19-2010, 08:20 PM
http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/01/live_coverage_o.html

9:13 p.m. -- Coakley has conceded in a call to Scott Brown, according to a Brown aide.

catdd
01-19-2010, 08:22 PM
Pelosi should be babbling in tongues about now. Probably become a bag lady.

cindy25
01-19-2010, 08:22 PM
Brown wins according to Drudge

unbelievable

Pepsi
01-19-2010, 08:24 PM
Let the recounts and the election frade begin!!

Mini-Me
01-19-2010, 08:24 PM
God, I just hope the neocons don't sweep in the Fall...

klamath
01-19-2010, 08:25 PM
http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/01/live_coverage_o.html

9:13 p.m. -- Coakley has conceded in a call to Scott Brown, according to a Brown aide.

Well at least they may not try and contest it to delay seating Brown.

FrankRep
01-19-2010, 08:25 PM
Let the recounts and the election frade begin!!
Coakley just gave up. What a party pooper.

TCE
01-19-2010, 08:25 PM
God, I just hope the neocons don't sweep in the Fall...

If they do, they'll bring some of our guys with them.

Southron
01-19-2010, 08:26 PM
Sean Hannity calls this the Revolution...

tangent4ronpaul
01-19-2010, 08:27 PM
http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/01/live_coverage_o.html

9:13 p.m. -- Coakley has conceded in a call to Scott Brown, according to a Brown aide.

YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

Win by a LANDSLIDE!

Goodby health care, goodby cap and trade, goodby Obama's radical agenda!

-t

AuH20
01-19-2010, 08:27 PM
God, I just hope the neocons don't sweep in the Fall...


The neocons are being phased out little by little.

klamath
01-19-2010, 08:27 PM
Let the recounts and the election frade begin!!

If shes conceded I don't think they will fight for a recount.

Mini-Me
01-19-2010, 08:28 PM
If they do, they'll bring some of our guys with them.

Well, what I'm afraid of is that they'll decide they don't NEED our guys in order to keep winning see-saw elections every other cycle. What I'm seeing here is a voting populace that gets so tired of Republicans that any old Democrat will do, and then vice versa, ad nauseum.

HOLLYWOOD
01-19-2010, 08:28 PM
COAKLEY Concedes to Brown By Phone... DRUDGE REPORT


THE BOSTON TEA PARTY...

SCOTT BROWN (R) : 843,516 53%
MARTHA COAKLEY (D): 736,627 46%

YumYum
01-19-2010, 08:30 PM
Does this mean I will lose my ass in my investments in the FEMA Resorts timeshares??:eek:

Pepsi
01-19-2010, 08:30 PM
IF they do, you can expect the airport scanners be place in all shopping centers, public schools, and maybe even at your front door. Taser bracelets be force for every one flying, so you can be zap if you act up during flight.

FrankRep
01-19-2010, 08:32 PM
Hopefully Obamacare will be killed now.

TCE
01-19-2010, 08:32 PM
Well, what I'm afraid of is that they'll decide they don't NEED our guys in order to keep winning see-saw elections every other cycle. What I'm seeing here is a voting populace that gets so tired of Republicans that any old Democrat will do, and then vice versa, ad nauseum.

If our guys win the primaries, they will get swept in on the GOP wave. For instance, let's say Rand wins the primary, in a GOP wave year, his chances go way up and there is nothing the leadership can do about it.

Then in a few years, we can run a few people as Democrats like they have in NH and, according to SpeciallyBlend, there is something of a liberty movement in the Colorado Democratic Party. We can have some good people on both sides within a few elections.

tpreitzel
01-19-2010, 08:32 PM
If they do, they'll bring some of our guys with them.

The GOP is rather amusing... the goons in the leadership automatically think regaining a majority will return the neocons to power without publicly acknowledging a possibly transformed GOP in the process. ;)

Mini-Me
01-19-2010, 08:34 PM
If our guys win the primaries, they will get swept in on the GOP wave. For instance, let's say Rand wins the primary, in a GOP wave year, his chances go way up and there is nothing the leadership can do about it.

That's true for this year's elections, but I'm thinking longer term. If the neocons regain their confidence, it will be harder to make further inroads in the party.

AuH20
01-19-2010, 08:35 PM
That's true for this election, but I'm thinking longer term. If the neocons regain their confidence, it will be harder to make further inroads in the party.

I disagree. Bush singlehandedly destroyed the neocon governing model. It's going to be hard to push the same dreck.

Mini-Me
01-19-2010, 08:36 PM
I disagree. Bush singlehandedly destroyed the neocon governing model. It's going to be hard to push the same dreck.

It wasn't tonight. ;) I know you mean in the primaries, but still, remember that Ron Paul's marginalization in the GOP primaries came after Bush too.

Imperial
01-19-2010, 08:37 PM
Who cares? A statist vs. a statist...


Yep, I was just watching for Joe Kennedy's results. Disappointing he only got 1%.

AuH20
01-19-2010, 08:38 PM
It wasn't tonight. ;) I know you mean in the primaries, but still, remember that Ron Paul's marginalization in the GOP primaries came after Bush too.

It's still an uphill climb for us but the neocons are significantly weaker as opposed to 8 years ago. Many of their policies have been proven to be unmitigated failures. I don't know how they can successfully camouflage them.

tangent4ronpaul
01-19-2010, 08:43 PM
The anti-incumbent sentiment is going to take both Dems and Repubs out of office. We need to run candidates NOW while Americans are pissed off.

-t

ps: Coakley concession speach coming up right a way. Boston didn't turn out for her.

klamath
01-19-2010, 08:43 PM
Now is the time to get good candidates in the primaries. If the trend continues whoever we nominate will be swept in in November.

sarahgop
01-19-2010, 08:45 PM
we must put in liberty candidates in states where they can win, like texas. the greatest night in history!!

amisspelledword
01-19-2010, 08:49 PM
Now is the time to get good candidates in the primaries. If the trend continues whoever we nominate will be swept in in November.

this is how the R or D tag is useful

FrankRep
01-19-2010, 08:50 PM
we must put in liberty candidates in states where they can win, like texas. the greatest night in history!!
Victory for the least worse candidate. He better at least stop ObamaCare.

catdd
01-19-2010, 08:52 PM
yep

Mini-Me
01-19-2010, 08:53 PM
It's still an uphill climb for us but the neocons are significantly weaker as opposed to 8 years ago. Many of their policies have been proven to be unmitigated failures. I don't know how they can successfully camouflage them.

I hope you're right, but I fear you're wrong. There are still a lot of unrepentant neocons around. Some admit Bush was a failure but can't articulate why, and they still support the same basic policies. The rest never stopped loving Bush in the first place...as insane as that sounds. :rolleyes: When it comes to the general public, proving a policy to be an unmitigated failure doesn't seem to prevent it from being retried over and over again; see price controls, which ancient Babylon proved to be a failure. ;)

Although we've been trying to win people's hearts and minds on principle and arguments about issues, another big argument in our favor was, "Look, you're just not going to win in the general with a rabidly pro-war, pro-police state guy. Why not just give up on that part of your platform?" Even unrepentant neocons had become disoriented by wildly anti-GOP sentiment in the US, and I think that weakened their resolve against us. As public outrage shifts from the wars to Obamacare though (and the Dems failed on their peace promise), the electability argument is losing its validity, and I think a lot of neocons are just returning to their former arrogance.

AuH20
01-19-2010, 09:08 PM
I hope you're right, but I fear you're wrong. There are still a lot of unrepentant neocons around. Some admit Bush was a failure but can't articulate why, and they still support the same basic policies. The rest never stopped loving Bush in the first place...as insane as that sounds. :rolleyes: When it comes to the general public, proving a policy to be an unmitigated failure doesn't seem to prevent it from being retried over and over again; see price controls, which ancient Babylon proved to be a failure. ;)

Although we've been trying to win people's hearts and minds on principle and arguments about issues, another big argument in our favor was, "Look, you're just not going to win in the general with a rabidly pro-war, pro-police state guy. Why not just give up on that part of your platform?" Even unrepentant neocons had become disoriented by wildly anti-GOP sentiment in the US, and I think that weakened their resolve against us. As public outrage shifts from the wars to Obamacare though (and the Dems failed on their peace promise), the electability argument is losing its validity, and I think a lot of neocons are just returning to their former arrogance.

The key is retaking the congressional leadership positions. We need to retire that crook McConnell and bring in a deficit hawk & Fed opponent like Demint. In the house, we need someone other than Boehner (though he's improved substantially but I'm still leery) or Cantor.

tangent4ronpaul
01-19-2010, 10:33 PM
The interim senator has stepped down effective immediately and The Mass gvmt has indicated that they will fast track the approval of the election if there is no doubt as to the winner - and there is not any doubt.

Getting a modified health care bill through the house then the senate is not going to happen. If the witch Pelosi tries something slimy - that will seriously hurt dem incumbents in November, and as the Senate bill contains unexceptable abortion language - many House dems won't vote for it. Other reasons for dem no votes too.

The dem super majority is OVER! as is Obama's radical agenda! YEAH!!!!!

It's times like these that I wish the forum has a somersault emoticon! :D

Browns victory speech left me with a lot of hope. anti-tax, anti-big gov, anti-special interests... This guy could actually be good. He really didn't sound neocon at all.

-t

parocks
01-19-2010, 11:22 PM
The Democrats won't be winning in Kentucky in November.


If our guys win the primaries, they will get swept in on the GOP wave. For instance, let's say Rand wins the primary, in a GOP wave year, his chances go way up and there is nothing the leadership can do about it.

Then in a few years, we can run a few people as Democrats like they have in NH and, according to SpeciallyBlend, there is something of a liberty movement in the Colorado Democratic Party. We can have some good people on both sides within a few elections.

parocks
01-19-2010, 11:25 PM
Yay Brown!!!!!!!!!!


The interim senator has stepped down effective immediately and The Mass gvmt has indicated that they will fast track the approval of the election if there is no doubt as to the winner - and there is not any doubt.

Getting a modified health care bill through the house then the senate is not going to happen. If the witch Pelosi tries something slimy - that will seriously hurt dem incumbents in November, and as the Senate bill contains unexceptable abortion language - many House dems won't vote for it. Other reasons for dem no votes too.

The dem super majority is OVER! as is Obama's radical agenda! YEAH!!!!!

It's times like these that I wish the forum has a somersault emoticon! :D

Browns victory speech left me with a lot of hope. anti-tax, anti-big gov, anti-special interests... This guy could actually be good. He really didn't sound neocon at all.

-t