PDA

View Full Version : Nevada high court: O.J. jury questions should have been public!




Galileo Galilei
01-01-2010, 01:03 AM
Nevada high court: O.J. jury questions should have been public!

By The Associated Press

LAS VEGAS — Jury questionnaires in last year's O.J. Simpson robbery-kidnapping trial are subject to public disclosure and should not have been kept from the news media by the judge, the Nevada Supreme Court has ruled.

In a 6-0 ruling Dec. 24 in Stephens Media v. Dist. Ct., the court sided with open-records arguments by the Associated Press and Stephens Media LLC, owner of the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Attorney Donald Campbell, who represented AP and the Review-Journal in the case, hailed the decision as "a victory for the First Amendment and a victory for every citizen."

"One of the most critical features of our legal system is public access and open trials," Campbell said. "This decision reinforces just how important that commitment to full access is."

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=22442

This is the first set in overturning an outrage of justice; the persecution of O.J. Simpson by a Police State.
____

Galileo Galilei
01-02-2010, 12:57 AM
Mass Deception! You have all been duped!

The OJ Simpson murder trial was the crown jewel of the police state; makes the public think that people acquitted by juries are still guilty, even when they are proven innocent!

You can't win!!!

You are presumed innocent unless proven guilty!

PROOF that OJ Simpson is INNOCENT of murder!
OJ GUILTY BUT NOT OF MURDER.avi (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7905933759946122795&hl)

Galileo Galilei
01-02-2010, 02:23 PM
OJ's son Jason ... is HE the guilty one?

YouTube - OJ's son Jason ... is HE the guilty one? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUg_wzuWAJw)