Derek Johnson vs. Neocon Radio - Wrecking Hannity & Levin Show Propaganda

[Derek Johnson]

YouTube - Derek Johnson vs. Neocon Radio - Wrecking Hannity & Levin Show Propaganda (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GCytsKBSoU)

[TheEvilDetector]

That was Gold, particularly the second guy!!

[Derek Johnson]

That was Gold, particularly the second guy!!

Both callers were me.

ooops, I mean, the second caller was Mark Levin calling into his own show (which he had off last night), after too much Christmas wine...a little too much neocon honesty came through :eek:

[TheEvilDetector]

Both callers were me.

ooops, I mean, the second caller was Mark Levin calling into his own show (which he had off last night), after too much Christmas wine...a little too much neocon honesty came through :eek:

Your call was good.

You were quite respectful to the host, letting him run the bullshit that attempted (but failed terribly) to discredit you.

[purplechoe]

Both callers were me.

ooops, I mean, the second caller was Mark Levin calling into his own show (which he had off last night), after too much Christmas wine...a little too much neocon honesty came through :eek:

"You are a great American."

:)

[Derek Johnson]

Your call was good.

You were quite respectful to the host, letting him run the bullshit that attempted (but failed terribly) to discredit you.


Thanks...:p my YouTube is cattleprods911, I've done many of these

When I did this in '07 the people here seemed to dislike the way the calls went, but never bothered to call in themselves. I've used many tactics, just sticking to intervention (foreign or domestic) and the expense is good enough....there is no time for this or that.

[Derek Johnson]

"You are a great American."

:)

No you, YOU are a great American!

:)

[Austrian Econ Disciple]

LOL I liked the last one, that was hilarious.

[Derek Johnson]

LOL I liked the last one, that was hilarious.

Karl Marx Levin really shouldn't call into his own show post-booze like that, Amerika can't tolerate such brutal honesty.

[TheConstitutionLives]

the more calm you are the more effective you are. When you get all animated the average listener starts rolling his eyes. It's tough, I know. I've been cut off Levin's show before.

[Derek Johnson]

the more calm you are the more effective you are. When you get all animated the average listener starts rolling his eyes. It's tough, I know. I've been cut off Levin's show before.

You call and be:

http://mizba.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/fictional15_09.jpg

Sorry, this is me:

http://rlv.zcache.com/psycho_clown_poster-p228255340372652638trma_400.jpg

Of course you have links to demonstrate this behavior?

[Derek Johnson]

the more calm you are the more effective you are. When you get all animated the average listener starts rolling his eyes. It's tough, I know. I've been cut off Levin's show before.

Seriously though, my 2nd call was all mockery. Karl Marx Levin does this zit popping vocal climax drama queen act every night...

[Liberty Star]

DJ, don't know what you did to turn off their listeners but owner company of Levin show , Citadel , just filed for bankruptcy. Hannity jumped ship just few months before that and went to another radio network, Citadel used to be third largest Talk Radio network in the US.

[Derek Johnson]

DJ, don't know what you did to turn off their listeners but owner company of Levin show , Citadel , just filed for bankruptcy. Hannity jumped ship just few months before that and went to another radio network, Citadel used to be third largest Talk Radio network in the US.

Wish I could take credit. But the neocon thing is going sour, election by election, and the hostile calls to these shows is up from when I was busier with it in 07...and that was during dumb dumb's administration.

Establishment lying pukes like Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, Savage, Levin etc will start to see in Paul's way more and more (because he's right and they're wrong and we're broke) and pay more homage to Renaldus Maximus Reaganum....maintaining the libertarian rhetoric underlying macho military nationalist pseudo-xenophobic puffery and hubris, if only they would remember that Reagan defeated the Soviets by non-intervention.

Keep the pressure up, call these pukes and rub their face in it.

War…is harmful, not only to the conquered but to the conqueror. Society has arisen out of the works of peace; the essence of society is peacemaking. Peace and not war is the father of all things. Only economic action has created the wealth around us; labor, not the profession of arms, brings happiness. Peace builds, war destroys. (Socialism, p. 59)

The market economy involves peaceful cooperation. It bursts asunder when the citizens turn into warriors and, instead of exchanging commodities and services, fight one another. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 817 ; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 821)

Economically considered, war and revolution are always bad business. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 152)

The market economy means peaceful cooperation and peaceful exchange of goods and services. It cannot persist when wholesale killing is the order of the day. (Interventionism: An Economic Analysis, p. 67)

War prosperity is like the prosperity that an earthquake or a plague brings. The earthquake means good business for construction workers, and cholera improves the business of physicians, pharmacists, and undertakers; but no one has for that reason yet sought to celebrate earthquakes and cholera as stimulators of the productive forces in the general interest. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 154)

There have been...in all other nations, eulogists of aggression, war, and conquest. (Omnipotent Government, p. 232)

War can really cause no economic boom, at least not directly, since an increase in wealth never does result from destruction of goods. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 154)

[T]he essence of so-called war prosperity; it enriches some by what it takes from others. It is not rising wealth but a shifting of wealth and income. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 158)

War is… a destroyer and annihilator, in short, as an evil that strikes all, victor as well as vanquished. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 86)

The philosophy of protectionism is a philosophy of war. The wars of our age are not at variance with popular economic doctrines; they are, on the contrary, the inescapable result of consistent application of these doctrines. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 683; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 687)

Whoever wishes peace among peoples must fight statism. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 77)

Modern society, based as it is on the division of labor, can be preserved only under conditions of lasting peace. (Liberalism, p. 44)

[O]nly tolerance can create and preserve the condition of social peace without which humanity must relapse into the barbarism and penury of centuries long past. (Liberalism, p. 56)

Modern war is not a war of royal armies. It is a war of the peoples, a total war. It is a war of states which do not leave to their subjects any private sphere; they consider the whole population a part of the armed forces. Whoever does not fight must work for the support and equipment of the army. Army and people are one and the same. The citizens passionately participate in the war. For it is their state, their God, who fights. (Omnipotent Government, p. 104)

Men are fighting one another because they are convinced that the extermination of adversaries is the only means of promoting their own well-being. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 175; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 176)

The existence of the armaments industries is a consequence of the warlike spirit, not its cause. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 297; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 300)

What basis for war could there still be, once all peoples had been set free? (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 34)

[V]ictorious war is an evil even for the victor, that peace is always better than war. (Liberalism, p. 24)

Wars, foreign and domestic (revolutions, civil wars), are more likely to be avoided the closer the division of labor binds men. (Critique of Interventionism, p. 115)

War is the alternative to freedom of foreign investment as realized by the international capital market. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 498; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 502)

The statement that one man's boon is the other man's damage is valid with regard to robbery, war, and booty. The robber's plunder is the damage of the despoiled victim. But war and commerce are two different things. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 662; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 666)

It is certainly true that our age is full of conflicts which generate war. However, these conflicts do not spring from the operation of the unhampered market society. It may be permissible to call them economic conflicts because they concern that sphere of human life which is, in common speech, known as the sphere of economic activities. But it is a serious blunder to infer from this appellation that the source of these conflicts are conditions which develop within the frame of a market society. It is not capitalism that produces them, but precisely the anticapitalistic policies designed to check the functioning of capitalism. They are an outgrowth of the various governments' interference with business, of trade and migration barriers and discrimination against foreign labor, foreign products, and foreign capital. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 680; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 684)

What has transformed the limited war between royal armies into total war, the clash between peoples, is not technicalities of military art, but the substitution of the welfare state for the laissez-faire state. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 820; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 824 )

Under laissez faire peaceful coexistence of a multitude of sovereign nations is possible. Under government control of business it is impossible. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 820; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 824)

Of course, in the long run war and the preservation of the market economy are incompatible. Capitalism is essentially a scheme for peaceful nations. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 824; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 828)

What the incompatibility of war and capitalism really means is that war and high civilization are incompatible. If the efficiency of capitalism is directed by governments toward the output of instruments of destruction, the ingenuity of private business turns out weapons which are powerful enough to destroy everything. What makes war and capitalism incompatible with one another is precisely the unparalleled efficiency of the capitalist mode of production. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 824; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 828)

The emergence of the international division of labor requires the total abolition of war. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 827; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 831)

Modern war is merciless, it does not spare pregnant women or infants; it is indiscriminate killing and destroying. It does not respect the rights of neutrals. Millions are killed, enslaved, or expelled from the dwelling places in which their ancestors lived for centuries. Nobody can foretell what will happen in the next chapter of this endless struggle. This has little to do with the atomic bomb. The root of the evil is not the construction of new, more dreadful weapons. It is the spirit of conquest. It is probable that scientists will discover some methods of defense against the atomic bomb. But this will not alter things, it will merely prolong for a short time the process of the complete destruction of civilization. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 828; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 832)

To defeat the aggressors is not enough to make peace durable. The main thing is to discard the ideology that generates war. (1st Ed. Human Action, p. 828; 3rd Ed. Human Action, p. 832)

The attainment of the economic aims of man presupposes peace, (Socialism, p. 62)

Social development is always a collaboration for joint action; the social relationship always means peace, never war. Death-dealing actions and war are anti-social. All those theories which regard human progress as an outcome of conflicts between human groups have overlooked this truth. (Socialism, p. 279)

Within a world of free trade and democracy there are no incentives for war and conquest. (Omnipotent Government, p. 3)

But what is needed for a satisfactory solution of the burning problem of international relations is neither a new office with more committees, secretaries, commissioners, reports, and regulations, nor a new body of armed executioners, but the radical overthrow of mentalities and domestic policies which must result in conflict. (Omnipotent Government, p. 6)

If some peoples pretend that history or geography gives them the right to subjugate other races, nations, or peoples, there can be no peace. (Omnipotent Government, p. 15)

For only in peace can the economic system achieve its ends, the fullest satisfaction of human needs and wants. (Omnipotent Government, p. 50)

It is not a shortcoming of the liberal program for international peace that it cannot be realized within an antiliberal world and that it must fail in an age of interventionism and socialism. (Omnipotent Government, p. 91)

Wars of aggression are popular nowadays with those nations which are convinced that only victory and conquest could improve their material well-being. (Omnipotent Government, p. 104)

The old liberals were right in asserting that no citizen of a liberal and democratic nation profits from a victorious war. (Omnipotent Government, p. 104)

Social cooperation and war are in the long run incompatible… But within the social system of cooperation and division of labor war means disintegration. The progressive evolution of society requires the progressive elimination of war. Under present conditions of international division of labor there is no room left for wars. The great society of world-embracing mutual exchange of commodities and services demands a peaceful coexistence of states and nations. (Omnipotent Government, p. 122)

If men do not now succeed in abolishing war, civilization and mankind are doomed. (Omnipotent Government, p. 122)

If you want to abolish war, you must eliminate its causes. What is needed is to restrict government activities to the preservation of life, health, and private property, and thereby to safeguard the working of the market. Sovereignty must not be used for inflicting harm on anyone, whether citizen or foreigner. (Omnipotent Government, p. 138)

The market economy involves peaceful cooperation and bursts asunder when people, instead of exchanging commodities and services, are fighting one another. (The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science p. 92)

Only one thing can conquer war--that liberal attitude of mind which can see nothing in war but destruction and annihilation, and which can never wish to bring about a war, because it regards war as injurious even to the victors. (Theory of Money and Credit, p. 433)

Where liberalism prevails, there will never be war. (The Theory of Money and Credit, p. 433)

If war is regarded as advantageous, then laws . . . will not be allowed to stand in the way of going to war. On the first day of any war, all the laws opposing obstacles to it will be swept aside. (The Theory of Money and Credit, p. 434)

The first condition for the establishment of perpetual peace is, of course, the general adoption of the principles of laissez-faire capitalism. (The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science p. 137)

He who wants to prepare a lasting peace must…be a free-trader and a democrat and work with decisiveness for the removal of all political rule over colonies by a mother country and fight for the full freedom of movements of persons and goods. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 86)

If one wants to make peace, then one must get rid of the possibility of conflicts between peoples. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 86)

If one holds the view that there are irreconcilable class antagonisms between the individual strata of society that cannot be resolved except by the forcible victory of one class over others, if one believes that no contacts between individual nations are possible except those whereby one wins what the other loses, then, of course, one must admit that revolutions at home and wars abroad cannot be avoided. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 87)

Whoever wants peace among nations must seek to limit the state and its influence most strictly. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 94)

The way to eternal peace does not lead through strengthening state and central power, as socialism strives for. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 96)

[W]ith the progress of the division of labor we see the number of wars and battles diminishing ever more and more. The spirit of industrialism, which is indefatigably active in the development of trade relations, undermines the warlike spirit. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 150)

Liberalism rejects aggressive war not on philanthropic grounds but from the standpoint of utility. It rejects aggressive war because it regards victory as harmful, and it wants no conquests because it sees them as an unsuitable means for reaching the ultimate goals for which it strives. Not through war and victory but only through work can a nation create the preconditions for the well-being of its members. Conquering nations finally perish, either because they are annihilated by strong ones or because the ruling class is culturally overwhelmed by the subjugated. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 87)

History has witnessed the failure of many endeavors to impose peace by war, cooperation by coercion, unanimity by slaughtering dissidents…. A lasting order cannot be established by bayonets. (Omnipotent Government, p. 7)

Whoever on ethical grounds wants to maintain war permanently for its own sake as a feature of relations among peoples must clearly realize that this can happen only at the cost of the general welfare, since the economic development of the world would have to be turned back at least to the state of the year 1830 to realize this martial ideal even only to some extent. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 151)

The losses that the national economy suffers from war, apart from the disadvantages that exclusion from world trade entails, consist of the destruction of goods by military actions, of the consumption of war material of all kinds, and of the loss of productive labor that the persons drawn into military service would have rendered in their civilian activities. Further losses from loss of labor occur insofar as the number of workers is lastingly reduced by the number of the fallen and as the survivors become less fit in consequence of injuries suffered, hardships undergone, illnesses suffered, and worsened nutrition. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 151–52)

There are circumstances which make the consumption of capital unavoidable. A costly war cannot be financed without such a damaging measure….There may arise situations in which it may be unavoidable to burn down the house to keep from freezing, but those who do that should realize what it costs and what they will have to do without later on. (Interventionism: an Economic Analysis, p. 52)

It is not the war profits of the entrepreneurs that are objectionable. War itself is objectionable! (Interventionism: an Economic Analysis, p. 74)

From the beginning the intention prevailed in all socialist groups of dropping none of the measures adopted during the war after the war but rather of advancing on the way toward the completion of socialism. (Nation, State, and Economy, p. 176)

[A]ggressors cannot wage total war without introducing socialism. (Interventionism: an Economic Analysis, p. 70)

The great British economist Edwin Cannan (1861–1935) wrote that if anyone had the impertinence to ask him what he did in the Great War, he would answer, "I protested." (Economic Freedom and Interventionism, p. 172.)

[Liberty Star]

Good points, their neoconish thing had lost its charm. I think you can take some credit like many others who helped expose their lies.


Citadel Broadcasting Files for Bankruptcy

By MICHAEL J. de la MERCED
Published: December 20, 2009

The Citadel Broadcasting Corporation, one of the nation’s largest radio broadcasters, filed for bankruptcy in New York on Sunday after agreeing to turn over control of the company to its creditors in exchange for reducing its debt.

Citadel, which is based in Las Vegas, also distributes news and talk radio programming to stations, including “The Mark Levin Show” and “The Huckabee Report.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/21/business/media/21citadel.html


It's sad, no one should face such troubles as people have families to feed. But neocons have done a lot to bring economic crisis for the whole nation.

[libertarian4321]

YouTube - Derek Johnson vs. Neocon Radio - Wrecking Hannity & Levin Show Propaganda (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GCytsKBSoU)

The show host is sort of technically correct.

The term "Neocon" was coined decades ago and it referred to a group of liberal intellectuals. However, the meaning of the word has morphed over time and has only some similarity to it's original usage.

He knew damned well that the caller wasn't referring to the old 1940's definition of neocon, and got into a semantic debate to avoid addressing the real issue.

This is not an uncommon ploy by right wing neocon talk show hosts, so we would be wise to understand the game they are playing in advance. This is a reasonably good explanation of the history of the term:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neocon

[Derek Johnson]

The show host is sort of technically correct.

The term "Neocon" was coined decades ago and it referred to a group of liberal intellectuals. However, the meaning of the word has morphed over time and has only some similarity to it's original usage.

He knew damned well that the caller wasn't referring to the old 1940's definition of neocon, and got into a semantic debate to avoid addressing the real issue.

This is not an uncommon ploy by right wing neocon talk show hosts, so we would be wise to understand the game they are playing in advance. This is a reasonably good explanation of the history of the term:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neocon

He pulled the 30s out of his ass, and he dodged the point that Ron Paul makes that we are falling into Al Qaeda's trap of spend spend spend over there. There were foreign interventionalists (Henry Clay, Lincoln's political boss) in the 19th century who plotted to invade Canada for example...but Leo Strauss and Irving Kristol are the origin of the Republican party infiltration.

A Neocon radio personality will say something like this: we are at war with jihad terrorism and we need to kill kill kill wherever and whenever. Then two minutes later...these damn democrats just want to spend spend spend wherever and whenever, we need more Republicans for small limited government. :rolleyes:

[sofia]

It's time we step up our efforts to expose false flag terror (9/11 , shoe bomber, and the underwear bomber)


unless 911 is exposed, iwe will never get through to the sheeple with argumanets against the war.....and every subsequent "failed terror plot" will just reinforce the myth of Al Qaeda...


THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AL QAEDA!....We fall into the neo-con trap everytime we accept the fairy tale of Muslim terrorists.

9/11 was an inside job

[Stary Hickory]

You know I heard this yesterday on Sirius Radio and I recognized this guy from his other youtube video call ins. I kind of started laughing. There was some disgusting neocon talk go on during that program....Ann Coulter was on and she is the very definition of Neocon bitch.

[pacelli]

Both callers were me.

ooops, I mean, the second caller was Mark Levin calling into his own show (which he had off last night), after too much Christmas wine...a little too much neocon honesty came through :eek:

That was awesome!!!! Excellent impersonation of Levin, too. By the way, if you want to harangue Tom Marr, he's on a huge AM radio station in Baltimore that is listened to by millions.

Get your first slice of the conservative pie in morning Baltimore radio on the Tom Marr Show weekdays 9am to noon on Talk Radio 680 WCBM.

http://tommarr.com/

http://www.wcbm.com/index.php

[sluggo]

It's funny to hear neocons trying to distance themselves from other neocons.

Great calls, BTW.

[Austrian Econ Disciple]

That was awesome!!!! Excellent impersonation of Levin, too. By the way, if you want to harangue Tom Marr, he's on a huge AM radio station in Baltimore that is listened to by millions.

Get your first slice of the conservative pie in morning Baltimore radio on the Tom Marr Show weekdays 9am to noon on Talk Radio 680 WCBM.

http://tommarr.com/

http://www.wcbm.com/index.php

I still laugh everytime I listen to that. That Levin impersonation is killer, you big dope!

[Liberty Star]

YouTube - Derek Johnson vs. Neocon Radio - Wrecking Hannity & Levin Show Propaganda (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GCytsKBSoU)

That was some fine radio!

[CharlesTX]

That was awesome!! LMAO!

[Derek Johnson]

It's time we step up our efforts to expose false flag terror (9/11 , shoe bomber, and the underwear bomber)


unless 911 is exposed, iwe will never get through to the sheeple with argumanets against the war.....and every subsequent "failed terror plot" will just reinforce the myth of Al Qaeda...


THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AL QAEDA!....We fall into the neo-con trap everytime we accept the fairy tale of Muslim terrorists.

9/11 was an inside job



Sofia, oh there is such thing as Al Qaeda, and what's sad is that it was exclusively our CIA linked assets during the Afgan-Soviet conflict. The short of the story is that our intervention has many many consequences, and costs a ton of printed, taxed, or borrowed money; and each of these intervention consequences get used to destroy what used to be America, liberty, and the libertarian "leave me alone" mantra.

9/11 as we know it is the biggest lie since JFK, and you're right. We create the boogie men we pay media whores like Marx Levin and Sean ******y to fear monger those who think their "conservative". How about a "real" 9-11 investigation, something that one person who builds steel framed building recommends:

YouTube - Mechanical Engineer Derek Johnson "Engineering Destruction" part 1 - Ae911Truth (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=142Ati4GEJQ)

[Bman]

Not your best work, but still enjoyable.:)

[christagious]

lol, you big dope

[Dianne]

OMG !!! Actually the radio show host is a total loser. Every time a good point was about to be made that would make him look like a fool, he would raise his voice to block out the caller's comment.

[Romulus]

damn fing hilarious LOL.

[Liberty Star]

"You're great neocon American" LOL

[Dunedain]

oh Hell ya! We need to drop MORE bombs on Yemen....that was great. He was probably thinking "yes you are right but shhhh....we want to be subtle about this."

Now you've got me wanting to do this. hmmmm....who is a good target....? I'd call Hannity but how hard is it to get through? plus, what did you say to get past the neo-con pre-screeners.

[Derek Johnson]

oh Hell ya! We need to drop MORE bombs on Yemen....that was great. He was probably thinking "yes you are right but shhhh....we want to be subtle about this."

Now you've got me wanting to do this. hmmmm....who is a good target....? I'd call Hannity but how hard is it to get through? plus, what did you say to get past the neo-con pre-screeners.

Thanks! Yes, please do this. Go ahead, permission granted. Yeah, I'm attention whoring a bit by posting videos like this, but much more important is that it's much more than a small handful of us challenging the establishment media liars like Hannity and Levin. An organized minorty trumps a lazy majority, and we can shape the GOP and grow the Libertarian party at the present.

I'd be equally damaging on "liberal" radio, but these shows are not on the airwaves in central Texas....so I plant Mises Libertarian seeds in the minds of those who really think that Iran is more of a threat than, say, China. The only real threat to the Misesian is the historical fact that military power lags, but ultimately always follows economic power. Ron Paul says this often when he get the "you're not for the military Ron, are you?" nonsense. Ron Paul is one of the greatest military minds alive in the US, he knows when to hit and how to do it legally, as well as when to leave be. Leaving be gives us the economic, and ultimately continued military superiority if say, China wanted California and Alaska for an over-due and likely unpayable debt.

In terms of the magic thing to say to screeners...Ron Paul is a "don't go there" sacred cow in the world of neocon radio. Do not mention this man's name to any screener ever, take it from me. Just try to appear as an Obama supporter, and try not to come off as well informed. The screeners want fresh meat for the neocon hosts to devour in 2 minutes or less.

Once you are on air, don't assume that you will have time, you won't. I received criticism that I go for the juggler and this shorts my time. Try for yourself, but you will quickly understand there is no time for lengthy discourses on the Libertarian non aggresion principle, Rothbardian-Lockeian "natural" property rights, Austrian Economics vs. Chicago monetarists / Friedmanite supply siders or any such similar "out there" thing on reactionary propaganda shows like these.

Just ask them why our foreign policy is marching goose-step with Bin Laden's wishes, or similar financial aspects of our foreign policy. Again, appear somewhat stupid and very liberal (as it's widely understood) to the screaners and bombs away the moment your voice is on air. Keep it simple, you'll do fine.

[Dunedain]

Thanks! Yes, please do this. Go ahead, permission granted. Yeah, I'm attention whoring a bit by posting videos like this, but much more important is that it's much more than a small handful of us challenging the establishment media liars like Hannity and Levin. An organized minorty trumps a lazy majority, and we can shape the GOP and grow the Libertarian party at the present.

I'd be equally damaging on "liberal" radio, but these shows are not on the airwaves in central Texas....so I plant Mises Libertarian seeds in the minds of those who really think that Iran is more of a threat than, say, China. The only real threat to the Misesian is the historical fact that military power lags, but ultimately always follows economic power. Ron Paul says this often when he get the "you're not for the military Ron, are you?" nonsense. Ron Paul is one of the greatest military minds alive in the US, he knows when to hit and how to do it legally, as well as when to leave be. Leaving be gives us the economic, and ultimately continued military superiority if say, China wanted California and Alaska for an over-due and likely unpayable debt.

In terms of the magic thing to say to screeners...Ron Paul is a "don't go there" sacred cow in the world of neocon radio. Do not mention this man's name to any screener ever, take it from me. Just try to appear as an Obama supporter, and try not to come off as well informed. The screeners want fresh meat for the neocon hosts to devour in 2 minutes or less.

Once you are on air, don't assume that you will have time, you won't. I received criticism that I go for the juggler and this shorts my time. Try for yourself, but you will quickly understand there is no time for lengthy discourses on the Libertarian non aggresion principle, Rothbardian-Lockeian "natural" property rights, Austrian Economics vs. Chicago monetarists / Friedmanite supply siders or any such similar "out there" thing on reactionary propaganda shows like these.

Just ask them why our foreign policy is marching goose-step with Bin Laden's wishes, or similar financial aspects of our foreign policy. Again, appear somewhat stupid and very liberal (as it's widely understood) to the screaners and bombs away the moment your voice is on air. Keep it simple, you'll do fine.

Great idea. Act like a dumb liberal for optimal selection on neo-con radio. I was thinking acting like a Hannity-diddle-head but they probably don't want choir preachers...but fresh meat like you said.

I'm going to have to work on why I love Obama so much.

[Austrian Econ Disciple]

Thanks! Yes, please do this. Go ahead, permission granted. Yeah, I'm attention whoring a bit by posting videos like this, but much more important is that it's much more than a small handful of us challenging the establishment media liars like Hannity and Levin. An organized minorty trumps a lazy majority, and we can shape the GOP and grow the Libertarian party at the present.

I'd be equally damaging on "liberal" radio, but these shows are not on the airwaves in central Texas....so I plant Mises Libertarian seeds in the minds of those who really think that Iran is more of a threat than, say, China. The only real threat to the Misesian is the historical fact that military power lags, but ultimately always follows economic power. Ron Paul says this often when he get the "you're not for the military Ron, are you?" nonsense. Ron Paul is one of the greatest military minds alive in the US, he knows when to hit and how to do it legally, as well as when to leave be. Leaving be gives us the economic, and ultimately continued military superiority if say, China wanted California and Alaska for an over-due and likely unpayable debt.

In terms of the magic thing to say to screeners...Ron Paul is a "don't go there" sacred cow in the world of neocon radio. Do not mention this man's name to any screener ever, take it from me. Just try to appear as an Obama supporter, and try not to come off as well informed. The screeners want fresh meat for the neocon hosts to devour in 2 minutes or less.

Once you are on air, don't assume that you will have time, you won't. I received criticism that I go for the juggler and this shorts my time. Try for yourself, but you will quickly understand there is no time for lengthy discourses on the Libertarian non aggresion principle, Rothbardian-Lockeian "natural" property rights, Austrian Economics vs. Chicago monetarists / Friedmanite supply siders or any such similar "out there" thing on reactionary propaganda shows like these.

Just ask them why our foreign policy is marching goose-step with Bin Laden's wishes, or similar financial aspects of our foreign policy. Again, appear somewhat stupid and very liberal (as it's widely understood) to the screaners and bombs away the moment your voice is on air. Keep it simple, you'll do fine.

You've inspired me to come up with something witty for the Levin show haha.

[Derek Johnson]

I'm going to have to work on why I love Obama so much.

That does require work...;)

Well, get em Dunedain! Bring them down.

[Derek Johnson]

You've inspired me to come up with something witty for the Levin show haha.

Great, post a link Austrian when mission accomplished.

Good luck!

[Liberty Star]

This clip is packed with such witty energy and sharp exchange, we need more lively calls like these in to MSM programs.

[ClayTrainor]

Great work Derek. Hilarious!

[Derek Johnson]

Great work Derek. Hilarious!

Thanks! I sucker punched Hannity and promoted Adam Kokesh on Mark Levin's neocon show today. Mark said he hadn't heard of Kokesh. More to come...I'd fetch the audio and share....

[Romulus]

^post up that audio!!

[cheapseats]

Did we ever learn the Authoritative Office to which Derek Johnson aspires?

[roho76]

Derek I really like your attitude. Those calls were great and there is no time for cordial calls into these Neo-Con bath houses especially when all they do is talk over you when they don't like what your saying. They are down right rude to anybody who tries to speak the truth and they in turn deserve no respect. With that being said....


if only they would remember that Reagan defeated the Soviets by non-intervention.

How is using Osama Bin Laden to defeat the Soviets non-intervention?

[Romulus]

Did we ever learn the Authoritative Office to which Derek Johnson aspires?

activism takes on many forms.

[Liberty Star]

It does.