PDA

View Full Version : Fifth Column media lies -- “public option” is an illusion!




johnwk
12-29-2009, 05:05 PM
Our Fifth Column media personalities are playing their role to perfection theses days in trying to convince the public that there is a big fight in Congress over a “public option”, AKA government controlled health insurance. Our talking heads continue to report that Democrats are deeply divided but the “far left” will eventually agree a half of loaf is better than no loaf at all and will begrudgingly vote for the Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 without a “government option” being contained in the bill.

But this performance by our Fifth Column media personalities is designed to distract concerned Americans who correctly realize a government control over their health care choices is not in their best interests. What our media personalities are now doing is going along with the Democrat Leader’s charade that there is a big fight among the Democrat Party Leadership over a “public option“. This charade will eventually allow for an illusion that a concession has been made by the far left dropping their demand for the government controlled option, who will finally vote for passage of the bill, and ABRACADABRA! the American people will have been saved from a government takeover of their health care choices.

But the illusion is intended to hide the real object of our control freak Congress and flimflamming President which has always been a fascist government takeover of the entire health issuance industry! Why settle for a mere government option when one can work to seize regulatory control over the entire industry, which is cleverly provided for within the bill? Is it so difficult to realize establishing this new regulatory control over the industry will create a new and never ending tidal wave of bribery payoffs to folks in government by the industry to avoid the iron fist of Obama’s regulatory Czars?

Why is there so much corruption and bribery in Congress you ask? Because Congress has been allowed to usurp regulatory powers over countless subject matters unauthorized by our written Constitution, and uses those regulatory powers to blackmail for profit!

And just what are Congress’ constitutionally authorized powers? They were summed up in Federalist No. 45 as follows:

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.

The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”

And, the above intentions expressed in Federalist 45 were given force and effect by the Tenth Amendment which incorporated them into our Constitution and confirmed a federal government with defined and limited powers --- limited powers which were later confirmed by our very own Supreme Court in the following words:

“The government of the United States is of the latter description. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing; if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts prohibited and acts allowed are of equal obligation. It is a proposition too plain to be contested, that the constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it; or, that the legislature may alter the constitution by an ordinary act.

Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.

If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law: if the latter part be true, then written constitutions are absurd attempts, on the part of the people, to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.

Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void.” ___ MARBURY v. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

Bottom line is, Congress has no authority to “regulate” our personal health care choices as proposed under the insidiously named Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009, and, our Fifth Column media personalities know it, just as our RINO Fifth Column sympathizers know Congress has no constitutionally authorized power over our health care choices but play along with the illusion involving a “government option”.

When will the America People rise up and punish these gangsters on Capitol Hill --- no punishment to be left off the table?

JWK

"To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen and with the other to bestow upon favored individuals, to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes [Congress’ Wall Street bailout] is none the less a robbery because it is done under forms of law and called taxation." ____ Savings and Loan Assc. v. Topeka,(1875).