PDA

View Full Version : The New American: Ben Stein Says Ron Paul Uses "Anti-Semitic Arguments"




FrankRep
12-29-2009, 11:49 AM
Former actor-turned-economic and political advisor Ben Stein claimed Ron Paul was using an “anti-Semitic argument” when Congressman Paul argued the United States should refrain from bombing Yemen in a December 28 interview on CNN's Larry King Live. by Thomas R. Eddlem


Ben Stein Says Ron Paul Uses "Anti-Semitic Arguments" (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2651-ben-stein-says-ron-paul-uses-anti-semitic-arguments)


Thomas R. Eddlem | The New American (http://www.thenewamerican.com)
29 December 2009


Former actor-turned-economic and political advisor Ben Stein claimed Ron Paul was using an “anti-Semitic argument” when Congressman Paul argued the United States should refrain from bombing Yemen in a December 28 interview on CNN's Larry King Live.

YouTube - Ron Paul on Larry King 12/28/2009 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFdG4eySIU8)

Rep. Paul, a Republican from Texas, has argued for removing U.S. soldiers from the Middle East because the American presence there is increasingly seen by many Muslims as a foreign occupation force. Responding to Rep. Paul's argument that Americans should mind their own business and not become the policeman of the world, Stein argued: “No, we're not occupiers. That's the same anti-Semitic argument we've heard over and over again. That's the same anti-Semitic argument we've heard over and over again.”

Rep. Paul responded by saying, “That is a vicious attack,” and Stein defended his statement by saying, “Look, that is not a vicious attack.”

The argument began when Dr. Paul noted that American foreign policy experts make bombing decisions while “never asking the question: What is the motive?” He went on to explain that the most recent would-be airline hijacker “said why he did it. He said because we bombed Yemen two weeks ago. That was his motive.” Dr. Paul then went on to explain that the United States is falling into the interventionist trap:


Osama bin Laden said that he has a plan for America. First, he wants to bog us down in the Middle East in a no-win war. He wants to bankrupt this country, demoralize us, as well as have us do things that motivate people to join his radical movement. It seems like we have fallen into his trap.

Dr. Paul (he's an obstetrician as well as a Congressman) noted that the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, now in their seventh and ninth years respectively, have spurred terrorist attacks from Muslims who want the foreign troops out of their countries. Ben Stein responded to Dr. Paul by saying, “I never heard anything quite like that in my whole life. What he's basically saying is that we are doing something wrong by defending ourselves. Look, if these terrorists are trying to kill the government of Yemen, we've got to help defend them. They are our friends.”

That was an odd retort, since it leaves the question of who the “ourselves” is in Stein's sentence. While the question of whether Yemen is a government that ranks among “our friends” is debatable at best (it's a corrupt pseudo-democracy with a horrible human-rights record), it hardly stands to reason that defending a rather insignificant and corrupt government on the other end of the planet is equivalent to defending U.S. soil.

Asked again why terrorists were targeting the United States rather than other free countries, Stein replied, “They're terrorists and murderers because they are psychos. They're terrorists and murderers because they are psychos, same as all terrorists and murderers.” But, of course, if they are “psychos,” then they don't act with any reason. And if they don't act with any reason, then there's no reason to believe they would target the United States more than any other country. In fact, if they are indeed insane as Ben Stein suggests, there's less chance of them attacking the United States than the country where they are currently living because attacking the United States requires the kind of travel and planning that the insane rarely undertake.

Stein's attack on Dr. Paul is only the latest gaffe by the former movie actor. Stein served as a frequent financial advisor on CNBC in 2007, where he doled out terrible predictions (http://tiny.cc/4TlP5) in a debate with Euro-Pacific Capital President Peter Schiff. Faced with dire warnings about the coming housing market crash from Schiff, Stein predicted a healthy housing market. “Sub-prime is tiny. Sub-prime is a tiny, tiny blip,” Stein stressed, adding (http://tiny.cc/4TlP5):


The financials, as I keep saying, are just super-bargains. I predict that, like, Merrill Lynch which is an astonishingly well-run company. Did you know that a couple of days ago it was trading at barely more than seven times earnings? Financials typically trade at a low P-E [price to earnings ratio], but this is a joke. This stock, they might as well be giving it away in cereal boxes and giving it away, that's how cheap it is.

Ben Stein made that investment advice when Merrill Lynch was selling at $76.04 per share. That value quickly sunk to $21 per share and the firm only avoided bankruptcy after a 2008 Bank of America merger that nearly bankrupted the banking giant (Bank of America is the largest bank in the United States). Stein also predicted (http://tiny.cc/4TlP5) the stock market would continue to climb during the August 2007 CNBC show. “I think stocks will be a heck of a lot higher a year from now than they are now,” Stein announced confidently. When he made this prediction on August 18, 2007, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was bouncing between 13,000 and 14,000, but within a year and a half, the DJIA had sunk to less than 7,000.

Throughout the heated debate, Stein never even tried to explain why Paul's contention that the United States should not be the policeman of the world is anti-Semitic. Ben Stein's accusation of “anti-Semitic argument” is clearly as accurate as his financial predictions several years ago. Perhaps that's why some Ron Paul supporters have started a “Win Ben Stein's Apology” page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=238859634632), a play on the former actor's old game show Win Ben Stein's Money. Larry King announced that he would invite both people back onto the show December 29 to continue the heated conversation.


SOURCE:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2651-ben-stein-says-ron-paul-uses-anti-semitic-arguments

FrankRep
12-29-2009, 12:45 PM
"Win Ben Stein's Apology" page on Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=238859634632

Dunedain
12-29-2009, 01:05 PM
The non-interventionist viewpoint is fundamentally anti-Israel. This is why it is not popular in Washington.

If the U.S. was not invading Israel's enemies, providing massive foreign aid to Isarel and arming them to the teeth, the end of Israel would be very swift...and the Israel Lobby is very powerful and won't let them happen.

lester1/2jr
12-29-2009, 03:01 PM
dunedain- thank you. it's really not very complicated. we are supposed to be the land of the brave but for some reason people can't say the truth on this one issue!

MelissaWV
12-29-2009, 03:05 PM
I'll point it out here, too: the headlines I am seeing on this, and the accompanying stories, are actually --- dare I say it? --- fair to Dr. Paul :eek:

Not long ago this would have mentioned Dr. Paul as an anti-semite, and been focused more on Dr. Paul calling Ben Stein an "embarrassment."

I am slightly hopeful this might just be a little step in the right direction. Maybe people noticed that the sky IS falling, and the Government's the one that shot it down.

AmericaFyeah92
12-29-2009, 04:36 PM
The non-interventionist viewpoint is fundamentally anti-Israel. This is why it is not popular in Washington.

If the U.S. was not invading Israel's enemies, providing massive foreign aid to Isarel and arming them to the teeth, the end of Israel would be very swift...and the Israel Lobby is very powerful and won't let them happen.

How is America minding its own business fundamentally anti-Israel? Are you agreeing with Stein? We wouldn't cut off aid/support because we hate them, but to save money and lives. It would be the same for ALL countries, not some weird way of isolating Israel

Trigonx
12-29-2009, 04:58 PM
How is America minding its own business fundamentally anti-Israel? Are you agreeing with Stein? We wouldn't cut off aid/support because we hate them, but to save money and lives. It would be the same for ALL countries, not some weird way of isolating Israel

from how I read his post.

he is just explaining why Stein is so against non-intervention. It would force Israel to spend more of its own money on needed defenses and possibly lowering the living standards of its citizens.

squarepusher
12-29-2009, 05:13 PM
"Win Ben Stein's Apology" page on Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=238859634632

wow they have 550 members

Endgame
12-29-2009, 05:20 PM
How is America minding its own business fundamentally anti-Israel? Are you agreeing with Stein? We wouldn't cut off aid/support because we hate them, but to save money and lives. It would be the same for ALL countries, not some weird way of isolating Israel

It is if you actually are an anti-Semite. Look at this guy's other posts. Its obvious he's an 88.

By the way, I think Israel is a parasitic, racist apartheid state with a massive influence over our politicians and media which they use to milk us for their benefit. They know how to control both the left and right in this country.

FrankRep
12-29-2009, 06:01 PM
Ben Stein takes a cheap shot at Ron Paul

Examiner
December 29, 2009

Read:
http://www.examiner.com/x-16500-Lake-County-Independent-Examiner~y2009m12d29-Ben-Stein-takes-a-cheap-shot-at-Ron-Paul

FrankRep
12-29-2009, 09:16 PM
Former Israeli Minister exposes Ben Stein's trick against Ron Paul while on Larry King.

YouTube - Former Israeli Minister exposes Ben Stein's trick against Ron Paul while on Larry King. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIQf3u56PK8)

Danke
12-29-2009, 09:40 PM
Ben Stein Says Ron Paul Uses "Anti-Semitic Arguments" (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2651-ben-stein-says-ron-paul-uses-anti-semitic-arguments)


Thomas R. Eddlem | The New American (http://www.thenewamerican.com)
29 December 2009


Former actor-turned-economic and political advisor Ben Stein claimed Ron Paul was using an “anti-Semitic argument” when Congressman Paul argued the United States should refrain from bombing Yemen in a December 28 interview on CNN's Larry King Live.

YouTube - Ron Paul on Larry King 12/28/2009 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFdG4eySIU8)

Rep. Paul, a Republican from Texas, has argued for removing U.S. soldiers from the Middle East because the American presence there is increasingly seen by many Muslims as a foreign occupation force. Responding to Rep. Paul's argument that Americans should mind their own business and not become the policeman of the world, Stein argued: “No, we're not occupiers. That's the same anti-Semitic argument we've heard over and over again. That's the same anti-Semitic argument we've heard over and over again.”

Rep. Paul responded by saying, “That is a vicious attack,” and Stein defended his statement by saying, “Look, that is not a vicious attack.”

The argument began when Dr. Paul noted that American foreign policy experts make bombing decisions while “never asking the question: What is the motive?” He went on to explain that the most recent would-be airline hijacker “said why he did it. He said because we bombed Yemen two weeks ago. That was his motive.” Dr. Paul then went on to explain that the United States is falling into the interventionist trap:


Osama bin Laden said that he has a plan for America. First, he wants to bog us down in the Middle East in a no-win war. He wants to bankrupt this country, demoralize us, as well as have us do things that motivate people to join his radical movement. It seems like we have fallen into his trap.

Dr. Paul (he's an obstetrician as well as a Congressman) noted that the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, now in their seventh and ninth years respectively, have spurred terrorist attacks from Muslims who want the foreign troops out of their countries. Ben Stein responded to Dr. Paul by saying, “I never heard anything quite like that in my whole life. What he's basically saying is that we are doing something wrong by defending ourselves. Look, if these terrorists are trying to kill the government of Yemen, we've got to help defend them. They are our friends.”

That was an odd retort, since it leaves the question of who the “ourselves” is in Stein's sentence. While the question of whether Yemen is a government that ranks among “our friends” is debatable at best (it's a corrupt pseudo-democracy with a horrible human-rights record), it hardly stands to reason that defending a rather insignificant and corrupt government on the other end of the planet is equivalent to defending U.S. soil.

Asked again why terrorists were targeting the United States rather than other free countries, Stein replied, “They're terrorists and murderers because they are psychos. They're terrorists and murderers because they are psychos, same as all terrorists and murderers.” But, of course, if they are “psychos,” then they don't act with any reason. And if they don't act with any reason, then there's no reason to believe they would target the United States more than any other country. In fact, if they are indeed insane as Ben Stein suggests, there's less chance of them attacking the United States than the country where they are currently living because attacking the United States requires the kind of travel and planning that the insane rarely undertake.

Stein's attack on Dr. Paul is only the latest gaffe by the former movie actor. Stein served as a frequent financial advisor on CNBC in 2007, where he doled out terrible predictions (http://tiny.cc/4TlP5) in a debate with Euro-Pacific Capital President Peter Schiff. Faced with dire warnings about the coming housing market crash from Schiff, Stein predicted a healthy housing market. “Sub-prime is tiny. Sub-prime is a tiny, tiny blip,” Stein stressed, adding (http://tiny.cc/4TlP5):


The financials, as I keep saying, are just super-bargains. I predict that, like, Merrill Lynch which is an astonishingly well-run company. Did you know that a couple of days ago it was trading at barely more than seven times earnings? Financials typically trade at a low P-E [price to earnings ratio], but this is a joke. This stock, they might as well be giving it away in cereal boxes and giving it away, that's how cheap it is.

Ben Stein made that investment advice when Merrill Lynch was selling at $76.04 per share. That value quickly sunk to $21 per share and the firm only avoided bankruptcy after a 2008 Bank of America merger that nearly bankrupted the banking giant (Bank of America is the largest bank in the United States). Stein also predicted (http://tiny.cc/4TlP5) the stock market would continue to climb during the August 2007 CNBC show. “I think stocks will be a heck of a lot higher a year from now than they are now,” Stein announced confidently. When he made this prediction on August 18, 2007, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was bouncing between 13,000 and 14,000, but within a year and a half, the DJIA had sunk to less than 7,000.

Throughout the heated debate, Stein never even tried to explain why Paul's contention that the United States should not be the policeman of the world is anti-Semitic. Ben Stein's accusation of “anti-Semitic argument” is clearly as accurate as his financial predictions several years ago. Perhaps that's why some Ron Paul supporters have started a “Win Ben Stein's Apology” page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=238859634632), a play on the former actor's old game show Win Ben Stein's Money. Larry King announced that he would invite both people back onto the show December 29 to continue the heated conversation.


SOURCE:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2651-ben-stein-says-ron-paul-uses-anti-semitic-arguments

Excellent compilation of the background facts. I knew this information, but did not have links. Thanks FrankRep! You post great stuff.

FrankRep
12-29-2009, 11:01 PM
Peter Schiff Vs Ben Stein (August 18, 2007); Peter Schiff wins!

YouTube - August 18, 2007 - Peter Schiff Versus Ben Stein - Merrill Lynch was so cheap, they should have put them in Cereal boxes. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYX1AgEV0vo)

The Deacon
12-29-2009, 11:04 PM
You'd think if the Neos were so confident in their reasoning, that they wouldn't resort to the cheap anti-Semite card all the time.

ibaghdadi
12-30-2009, 12:40 AM
TIf the U.S. was not invading Israel's enemies, providing massive foreign aid to Isarel and arming them to the teeth, the end of Israel would be very swift...and the Israel Lobby is very powerful and won't let them happen.

I understand your argument but don't agree with where it leads. I don't think that an end to US aid to Israel would mean the end of Israel. I think ending US aid to Israel would ensure that the Arab-Israeli peace process be very swift. It's pretty much the best thing the US can do for the peace process without spending a penny - in fact while saving billions.

That's because it has always been Israel who stalls because they think they don't need peace, they can actually "win" this thing. Once they realize they can't win, they'll be forced to be serious about a peaceful solution. It's interesting that even Hamas and Al-Qaeda are willing to talk about a deal.

Let's face it, who's gonna invade and "end" Israel? All its neighbours are very weak, and mostly headed by sympathetic governments (Jordan, Egypt). Probably the only exception is Syria, which alone can't do much anyway.


Iyad

Immortal Technique
12-30-2009, 05:05 AM
YouTube - Ben Stein Would Like To See A Statue Made Of Ben Bernanke And Cheerlead's For The Fed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FulVYV9TnZI)

Nough said

FrankRep
12-30-2009, 02:17 PM
Ron Paul, Ben Stein, & Israeli Minister who said the anti-semitic label 'always used' as a trick VID

Examiner
December 30, 2009

Read:
http://www.examiner.com/x-27692-LA-County-Libertarian-Examiner~y2009m12d30-Ron-Paul-Ben-Stein--Israeli-Minister-who-said-the-antisemitic-label-always-used-as-a-trick-VID


Former Israeli Minister exposes Ben Stein's trick against Ron Paul while on Larry King.

YouTube - Former Israeli Minister exposes Ben Stein's trick against Ron Paul while on Larry King. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIQf3u56PK8)

FrankRep
12-30-2009, 02:42 PM
Ben Stein Gets in More Trouble (http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/45829.html)


Lew Rockwell
December 30, 2009


Ben Stein, after slandering (http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/45732.html) Ron Paul on the Larry King Show, doesn’t even offer (http://spectator.org/archives/2009/12/30/a-ron-paul-moment) a non-apology apology, though clearly we’ve given him a hotfoot. He starts out with a title that, in his sort of lingo, would be called an ageist slur. Then he goes on to demonstrate either his paranoia combined with warmongering, or his deliberate attempt to silence dissent on perpetual war against the Muslims. Oppose US invasion and occupation of other people’s countries? Then you must be Hitler. Really, are we supposed to take this sort of cultural-Marxist accusation seriously? Ben, you’ve only got one hope: Calm down and offer a real apology. Check your own comments (http://spectator.org/archives/2009/12/30/a-ron-paul-moment) to see the reaction to your stonewalling.

UPDATE from Robert Katz:


As a Semite, I solemnly proclaim that I am anti-Ben.

UPDATE from Ron Holland:


Yes, I’m an Anti-Benite: Ben Stein, Ben Bernanke, Ben Nelson.


SOURCE:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/45829.html