PDA

View Full Version : Council on Foreign Relations is disappointed that Copenhagen is largely a Failure




FrankRep
12-19-2009, 12:07 PM
Council on Foreign Relations is disappointed that Copenhagen is largely a Failure



Forest plan gets the ax at UN climate talks

Associated Press
Dec 19, 2009


COPENHAGEN — A plan to protect the world's biologically rich tropical forests by paying poor nations to protect them was shelved Saturday after world leaders failed to agree on a binding deal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
...

"The failure to conclude a comprehensive agreement on forests is disappointing," said Michael Levi, senior fellow for energy and the environment at the Council on Foreign Relations. "But if developed countries can deliver the $100 billion per year aimed for in the broader Copenhagen Accord, there is little doubt that a large part of that will go to help preserve forests."
...

Kevin Conrad, executive director of the Coalition of Rainforest Nations:

"It's depressing," he said. "It means I've got to spend another year ... coming to meetings and talking about the same things."
...


Full Story:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5itjv33F83HBx5I_LqkweBGMe3VYAD9CMG7QO1






============


Who are the Council on Foreign Relations?


http://www.shopjbs.org/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/5e06319eda06f020e43594a9c230972d/S/h/Shadows_of_Power_web.jpg (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0882791346/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=libert0f-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399349&creativeASIN=0882791346)

The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0882791346/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=libert0f-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399349&creativeASIN=0882791346)
by James Perloff



Does America have a hidden oligarchy? Is U.S. foreign policy run by a closed shop? What is the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)? It began in 1921 as a front organization for J.P. Morgan and Company. By World War II it had acquired unrivaled influence on American foreign policy. Hundreds of U.S. government administrators and diplomats have been drawn from its ranks - regardless of which party has occupied the White House. But what does the Council on Foreign Relations stand for? Why do the major media avoid discussing it? What has been its impact on America's past - and what is it planning for the future? (2008, 272pp, pb)



Ron Paul Has the Council on Foreign Relations Worried
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=209210

Hillary Clinton Lets the CFR Cat Out of the Bag
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=200251

Council on Foreign Relations: Forget Privacy, We Need to Spy More
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=206911

CFR Pushes Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST)
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=191460

CFR President, Richard Haass, calls for the End of National Sovereignty of Nations
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=197325

Rick Warren, the Council on Foreign Relations, and Barack Obama
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=197150


Council On Foreign Relations
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/foreign-policy/1462


The Council on Foreign Relations and their influence over the Media


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-FuaXvxWmQ

FrankRep
12-19-2009, 12:17 PM
Flashback:

Note: Foreign Affairs is a publication of the Council on Foreign Relations.


Lower your expectations for Copenhagen, says Foreign Affairs journal


Grist Magazine
13 Aug 2009


Michael A. Levi of the Council on Foreign Relations (http://www.cfr.org/), writing in the September/October Foreign Affairs (http://www.cfr.org/publication/by_type/foreign_affairs.html), finds “vanishingly small” odds that December’s international negotiations in Copenhagen will produce a comprehensive climate treaty.

From the journal’s summary (emphasis mine):


“Government officials and activists should fundamentally rethink their strategy and expectations” for the December climate conference in Copenhagen, argues Michael A. Levi, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. According to Levi, the odds of signing a comprehensive treaty in December are “vanishingly small.” With this in mind, rather than aim for a broad global treaty, negotiators should reinforce existing national policies and seek “international cooperation focused on specific opportunities to cut emissions” in rich nations and the developing world. Levi urges officials to view the conference as a chance to build efforts to cut emissions from the ground up, and try to “reinforce developed countries’ emissions cuts and link developing countries’ actions ... to objectives in other areas—such as economic growth, security, and air quality—that leaders of those countries already care about.”


SOURCE:
http://www.grist.org/article/2009-08-13-lower-expectations-for-copenhagen-says-foreign-affairs-journal/

cheapseats
12-19-2009, 12:20 PM
It is not a complete loss. Think of the Economic Stimulus of thousands and thousands and thousands of billable hours for Big Law.

Inquiring Taxpaying Minds want to know total tab for ANOTHER Copenhagen Clusterfuck, this one culminating in reams and reams of non-binding Two Cents. Plus soaring rhetoric from our Fearful Leader, natch.

FrankRep
12-19-2009, 12:25 PM
It is not a complete loss. Think of the Economic Stimulus of countless billable hours for Big Law.

The CFR got what they wanted / Expected.


Copenhagen Summit Ends With Political Agreement
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091219-700925.html

Obama wins meaningful 'first step' at UN talks: reports
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/obama-seeks-to-seal-deal-in-copenhagen-2009-12-18?reflink=MW_news_stmp

All nations agree Copenhagen climate deal: Sarkozy
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BH1SQ20091218

The Copenhagen Accord: a deal far from perfect
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/the-copenhagen-accord-a-deal-far-from-perfect-20091219-l6oi.html