PDA

View Full Version : Pollster: 2010 could be year of 'the angry White Male' heading into elections




bobbyw24
12-17-2009, 11:11 AM
By Sean J. Miller - 12/16/09 03:20 PM ET

2010 could be the year of the “angry white male” as Americans are anxious about the state of the economy, according Republican pollster Ed Goeas.

Citing results from a new bipartisan survey released on Wednesday that found more men than women are struggling to find work, Goeas said, “There is the potential for this being a 1994 year of the angry white male."


Republicans captured control of both the House and Senate in the 1994 elections.

Of the 1,000 likely voters surveyed Dec. 6-9 in The George Washington University Battleground Poll conducted by the Tarrance Group and Lake Research Partners, 20 percent described themselves as "angry" about "the way things are going in the country today."

While only 5 percent of Democrats feel that way, 26 percent of Independents and 33 percent of Republicans described themselves as angry. Moreover, 35 percent of respondents said the country is in recession and 56 percent said it is on the wrong track.

Looking ahead to the 2010 elections, Goeas said, "I’m certainly going to say this is good news for Republicans.”


The poll was released at a breakfast briefing sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor.

Citing voters' main issue in the survey, Democratic pollster Celinda Lake said, "It's still the economy."

“There have been some really dramatic demographic changes going on in the country, when you see, for example, women holding more jobs than men," Lake said.

That's a “a real key change in terms of the economy," Lake added.

Pointing to a 13-point lead that Republicans enjoy over Democrats in the category of “extremely likely to vote,” Lake acknowledged that “there is a very important enthusiasm gap."

Healthcare may not be the issue to help Democrats overcome that gap.

“People feel fairly secure in their access to healthcare,” Lake said. “We still have a challenge when it comes to the healthcare debate."

Lake called the White House’s hands-off approach in dealing with the specifics of healthcare reform a “mistake."

“People are looking for the president to lay out his agenda," she said. Only 48 percent of those surveyed said President Barack Obama is better at handling healthcare reform than Republicans, down from 53 percent in July.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/72583-pollster-2010-could-be-year-of-the-angry-white-male

FindLiberty
12-17-2009, 11:23 AM
Yea, but I really hope "the election" produces a Liberty minded Thomas Jefferson outcome,
and not lose America to an angry Adolf Hitler "final solution + hyper-inflation" situation.

bobbyw24
12-17-2009, 12:17 PM
By: Mary Katharine Ham
Weekly Standard
December 16, 2009

In early November, Democratic representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida accused House Republicans of giving women "back-of-the-hand treatment" during a parliamentary dust-up over a health care debate.

Her ridiculous rhetoric, about what amounted to a heated argument, happened to coincide with the media blitz of newly ordained press darling Dede Scozzafava, playing the role of mistreated moderate woman ousted from the Republican party by rabid conservatives because of her views on social issues.

And thus a storyline was born. The Politico's coverage led the way, under the headline, "The GOP's women problem":

Conservatives say they pushed Dede Scozzafava out of the House race in New York's 23rd District a week ago because of her left-of-Republican social views--and not because she is a woman. But the growing schism between the Republican party's ascendant right wing and its shrinking moderate core has clear gender undertones.

When did you stop beating your promising, reasonable, moderate female candidates? Hmm?

The storyline relies on a misunderstanding of Scozzafava, willful ignorance of the recent behavior of women voters, and denial of the GOP's 2010 candidate field.

Scozzafava's ouster had little to do with her sex and a lot to do with the fact that she was a "moderate" Republican only if you believe "moderates" are endorsed by Markos Zuniga of Daily Kos, support card-check and the stimulus, work closely with ACORN-entangled liberal advocacy groups, and are funded primarily by Planned Parenthood and the Service Employees International Union.

Scozzafava is far from the model for reasonable, moderate Republican women. She's the kind of woman who calls the cops on a reporter for asking her policy questions. But she's the woman liberals wish represented Republicans--because she's a liberal herself, which is why she became an improbable fetish of the Fourth Estate.

If the media had cared to look beyond the fluky, three-way race in NY-23 for national implications, they could have considered women voters in battleground Virginia.

On November 3, Virginia governor-elect Bob McDonnell won women by eight points, 54-46, against Democrat Creigh Deeds. A year before, Obama had won women by seven points; in his historic campaign to turn the state blue, he relied largely on the educated, affluent, suburban vote McDonnell would recover for the GOP. This information was obscured under the CNN headline, "Male, rural, suburban votes boost McDonnell."

McDonnell's edge among women--27 points among white women--is all the more astonishing given the particular line of attack Deeds employed throughout the campaign, with the help of his devoted oppo researchers at the Washington Post.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Women-will-be-willing-to-listen-to-the-GOP-in-2010-79440307.html

bobbyw24
12-17-2009, 03:21 PM
when they get politically active? It never calls black or Latino politically active people "Angry Black Males" etc.

Dunedain
12-17-2009, 03:24 PM
when they get politically active? It never calls black or Latino politically active people "Angry Black Males" etc.

Politically active white males are the nazis, in the eyes of the media. Politically active blacks are "civil rights activists" fighting against the nazi system.

bobbyw24
12-17-2009, 03:24 PM
Politically active white males are the nazis, in the eyes of the media. Politically active blacks are "civil rights activists" fighting against the nazi system.

Unfortunately, you are correct. May the MSM die a quick and painful death

Danke
12-17-2009, 09:49 PM
Politically active white males are the nazis, in the eyes of the media. Politically active blacks are "civil rights activists" fighting against the nazi system.

+1

paulpwns
12-17-2009, 10:00 PM
+1

+1=3

gls
12-17-2009, 10:03 PM
If it's going to be another 1994, with a Republican "takeover" that amounts to little more than a change in establishment rhetoric, I'd rather the Democrats just kept power. Otherwise when shit really hits the fan the clueless masses will once again blame free markets and capitalism for the failures of big government and corporatism.

Aratus
12-18-2009, 10:01 AM
1960 & 1964 also springs to mind...

james1906
12-18-2009, 09:50 PM
If it's going to be another 1994, with a Republican "takeover" that amounts to little more than a change in establishment rhetoric, I'd rather the Democrats just kept power. Otherwise when shit really hits the fan the clueless masses will once again blame free markets and capitalism for the failures of big government and corporatism.

Yeah, the rank and file will do something menial like a 1% income tax reduction across the board then go back to their big government ways.