Ninja Homer
10-03-2007, 09:35 PM
I don't know if this idea has been posted before, but I think it would be easy to put together and be very effective for converting democrats to RP supporters.
Something similar to this:
When asked if they would have all US troops out of Iraq by the end of their first term,
Hillary Clinton said, "It is very difficult to know what we're going to be inheriting."
Barak Obama said: "I think it's hard to project four years from now."
John Edwards said: "I cannot make that commitment."
Congressman Ron Paul voted against the war in Iraq, and is committed to bringing all US troops home immediately.
Do you want to bring our troops home immediately, or do you want to pay in blood and borrowed money for the war in Iraq to continue beyond 2013?
Clinton, Obama, and Edwards are getting a lot of press right now (especially Clinton), and MSM is strongly pushing them to the public. I don't think their supporters have a clue that the democrat front runners won't commit to ending the war by 2013.
What do you think? See any down side to this?
Something similar to this:
When asked if they would have all US troops out of Iraq by the end of their first term,
Hillary Clinton said, "It is very difficult to know what we're going to be inheriting."
Barak Obama said: "I think it's hard to project four years from now."
John Edwards said: "I cannot make that commitment."
Congressman Ron Paul voted against the war in Iraq, and is committed to bringing all US troops home immediately.
Do you want to bring our troops home immediately, or do you want to pay in blood and borrowed money for the war in Iraq to continue beyond 2013?
Clinton, Obama, and Edwards are getting a lot of press right now (especially Clinton), and MSM is strongly pushing them to the public. I don't think their supporters have a clue that the democrat front runners won't commit to ending the war by 2013.
What do you think? See any down side to this?