Knightskye
12-03-2009, 03:51 PM
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/196/15602/
GLENN: Okay. Senator, I have been against every single one of these bailouts. This one I have said that I am for because I believe it is slow down catastrophe. However, there are caveats to that. Congress is taking this thing and I mean, introducing judges to be able to negotiate your renegotiate your interest level and your mortgage payments and everything else. And then the other disturbing thing that I'm starting to hear, I heard a lot of talk about it yesterday in the United Nations and everything else. United Nations is now saying to stem this, we must have one global financial system. You have China saying we need one global currency. You're starting to hear these things, making me believe that there's a lot of people in this that would certainly love to design a global financial system. Is that just talk of a raving madman?
Last night on his TV show, he claimed he supported it in September, 2008, but then two days later changed his mind and was against it.
In the transcript (link above), he talks about the "caveats" that made him not support it, meaning he would have supported the $700 billion to buy "toxic assets".
Beck has had Tom Woods on the show. I think he should read his book.
GLENN: Okay. Senator, I have been against every single one of these bailouts. This one I have said that I am for because I believe it is slow down catastrophe. However, there are caveats to that. Congress is taking this thing and I mean, introducing judges to be able to negotiate your renegotiate your interest level and your mortgage payments and everything else. And then the other disturbing thing that I'm starting to hear, I heard a lot of talk about it yesterday in the United Nations and everything else. United Nations is now saying to stem this, we must have one global financial system. You have China saying we need one global currency. You're starting to hear these things, making me believe that there's a lot of people in this that would certainly love to design a global financial system. Is that just talk of a raving madman?
Last night on his TV show, he claimed he supported it in September, 2008, but then two days later changed his mind and was against it.
In the transcript (link above), he talks about the "caveats" that made him not support it, meaning he would have supported the $700 billion to buy "toxic assets".
Beck has had Tom Woods on the show. I think he should read his book.