dude58677
12-01-2009, 09:43 PM
Liberals-
Costello: So you agree that the US shouldn't be in 140 countries around the world?
Abbot: Why sure.
Costello: You also think that the US having troops in 140 countries is the result of a standing army being a danger to liberty as the founding fathers claimed?
Abbot: Why sure.
Costello: So why not abolish our standing army and rely on our armed populace?
Abbot: Our armed populace isn't trained to defend the homeland and besides, only the military should have guns.
Costello: You said that our standing army was a danger to liberty?
Abbot: Why yes.
Costello: So why not rely on an armed populace?
Abbot: An armed populace isn't trained and only the military should have guns.
Costello: So us having troops in 140 countries is a danger to liberty as the founding fathers stated and therefore we should not have an armed populace because only the military should have guns?
Abbot: There, now that is the first thing you said right.
Costello: I don't know what the hell I'm talking about.
Conservatives-
Costello: You agree that the second amendment is an individual right to bear arms?
Abbot: Why sure.
Costello: You also agree that it eliminates the need for a standing army which is a danger to liberty?
Abbot: Why sure.
Costello: Why do we have troops in 140 countries?
Abbot: They are defending our freedoms. If you don't like it, you can leave.
Costello: You agree that a standing army is a danger to liberty?
Abbot: Yes.
Costello: Why do we have troops in 140 countries?
Abbot: To defend our freedoms and if you don't like it you are an unpatriotic liberal who should leave the country.
Costello: So we have an individual right to bear arms to prevent the need of a standing army which is a danger to liberty but we have troops in 140 countries because our army is defending our freedoms and if I don't agree I'm an unpatriotic liberal loon who should leave the country?
Abbot: There, now that is the first thing you said right.
Costello: I don't know what the hell I'm talking about.
Costello: So you agree that the US shouldn't be in 140 countries around the world?
Abbot: Why sure.
Costello: You also think that the US having troops in 140 countries is the result of a standing army being a danger to liberty as the founding fathers claimed?
Abbot: Why sure.
Costello: So why not abolish our standing army and rely on our armed populace?
Abbot: Our armed populace isn't trained to defend the homeland and besides, only the military should have guns.
Costello: You said that our standing army was a danger to liberty?
Abbot: Why yes.
Costello: So why not rely on an armed populace?
Abbot: An armed populace isn't trained and only the military should have guns.
Costello: So us having troops in 140 countries is a danger to liberty as the founding fathers stated and therefore we should not have an armed populace because only the military should have guns?
Abbot: There, now that is the first thing you said right.
Costello: I don't know what the hell I'm talking about.
Conservatives-
Costello: You agree that the second amendment is an individual right to bear arms?
Abbot: Why sure.
Costello: You also agree that it eliminates the need for a standing army which is a danger to liberty?
Abbot: Why sure.
Costello: Why do we have troops in 140 countries?
Abbot: They are defending our freedoms. If you don't like it, you can leave.
Costello: You agree that a standing army is a danger to liberty?
Abbot: Yes.
Costello: Why do we have troops in 140 countries?
Abbot: To defend our freedoms and if you don't like it you are an unpatriotic liberal who should leave the country.
Costello: So we have an individual right to bear arms to prevent the need of a standing army which is a danger to liberty but we have troops in 140 countries because our army is defending our freedoms and if I don't agree I'm an unpatriotic liberal loon who should leave the country?
Abbot: There, now that is the first thing you said right.
Costello: I don't know what the hell I'm talking about.