PDA

View Full Version : Dick Armey Defends Checklist of Principles for GOP Candidates




bobbyw24
11-30-2009, 07:11 AM
Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, a leader among conservatives vying to set the direction of the Republican party, said a 10-point checklist being proposed to determine whether a candidate merits GOP support is "not a litmus test" but an effort to ensure the party's ability to win future elections by presenting a true alternative.


"If the Republican Party is going to win any future elections, it has to be presented as an alternative to the Democrat Party's fiscal spending," Armey said on CBS' Face the Nation. "And in fact, it's a very reasonable thing to say, if you want the support of the Republican Party, demonstrate some allegiance to the primary positions taken by the party."

The checklist was proposed by conservative Indiana Republican James Bopp Jr. Under Bopp's resolution, which will be presented at the Republican National Committee winter meeting early next year, candidates would have to agree with at least seven of the ten points to get RNC funding or support.

Armey said "if you read the list, at least five of the 10 are right at the center stage -- center post of the big 10 of American politics today, fiscal conservatism."

Former RNC chairman Ed Gillespie acknowledged that "if you look at those 10 things that a Republican running in a primary for Congress against another Republican, the Republican who agrees with nine out of, you know, those 10 will beat the Republican who agrees with seven out of those 10."

But Gillespie expressed concern that use of the checklist to determine who merited support "would be in the best interest of the party at the end of the day."

"The question for me is...as a former chairman ... what if you have a Republican who agrees with seven out of those ten things running against a Democrat who agrees with zero out of those ten things and you want to put some money into a race to try to win back the House and you're constrained from doing that?" Gillespie said, also on CBS.

New York Republican Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, who dropped out of an upstate New York congressional race after Armey and other activists lined up behind Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, said on the show that "I would have been at seven out of 10 on the list."

"I think you've got to look at (my) predecessor," Scozzafava said. "John McHugh served this district very well. He was a moderate. Some of the positions that I got criticized for taking were positions that John already had. I think it's important that sometimes there are regional differences even as Mr. Armey represented Texas. There are certain things that he voted against that are right on the litmus test, the 10 steps."

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/11/29/armey-defends-checklist-of-principles-for-gop-candidates/

RM918
11-30-2009, 07:45 AM
A complete failure to even acknowledge anti-war opinion.

Athan
11-30-2009, 12:21 PM
Dick Armey is irrelevant. America has no money and his war posturing will be refuted by economic reality.

Liberty Star
11-30-2009, 12:35 PM
Dick Armey is irrelevant. America has no money and his war posturing will be refuted by economic reality.

There were rumors gouig around recently that he was finanacing and organizing recent Fox news promoted Tea Parties. He could still have thousands of supporters in GOP.

Brian4Liberty
11-30-2009, 01:45 PM
This is just a couple of jerks in the GOP attempting to rig the GOP platform. Comments on the "checklist":

(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama's "stimulus" bill;Since when? Actions speak louder than false pledges.

(2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run healthcare;Another new plank. Where was support for open competitive markets when you had the Bush majority?

(3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation; Good for you. Another new position.

(4) We support workers' right to secret ballot by opposing card check; Yippee.

(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants; McAmnesty anyone?

(6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges;When does the military recommend anything else? You want to supply police to the whole world? Global socialism?

(7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat;Yadda, yadda, yadda...

(8) We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act; Wow, that's important.

(9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; So you are saying that government health care will happen...

(10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership; Really? What about the rest of the Bill of Rights?

fisharmor
11-30-2009, 01:59 PM
For as long as I've been voting, politics has always been about choosing the lesser of two evils.
This will work, because Americans are ignorant, stupid, and have short memories.

I particularly like #10, though... when they seriously suggest we repeal NFA34 or GCA68, I'll believe it. Status quo is not support of gun rights.