Climategate - CRU Source Code Explained

[Immortal Technique]

YouTube - Update - Climategate - CRU Source Code Explained (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp4sMasX-_8)

Update on the actual source code that was released in the recent hack of the CRU.

The source code confirms the manipulation of climate data by climate scientists

So busted, i for the life of me cant figure out why people are not in the streets enraged
MSM sure is keeping quiet though, quite possibly one of the biggest hoaxes ever perpetrated on man and they are virtually silent.

[TheEvilDetector]

Honest Scientists should stand against these men!

[TheEvilDetector]

Nice comment from http://mindyourowndamnbusinesspolitics.com/wordpress/2009/11/25/fanaticism-brought-us-hacked-emails-and-climategate/


"
mkurbo November 25, 2009 at 2:53 pm

Daddy, why are we killing the polar bears with global warming ?

Oh sweetie, come here and sit down for a minute. You see, certain scientists told the world
some lies about this thing called global warming. Then, leaders from around the world supported
those lies and told more lies of their own. Even our leaders here in America told us lies too about
how this made-up thing would hurt people.

Look peanut, these people did a really bad thing. Their lies have cost trillions of dollars and wasted
people’s time and energy all around the world. But now these bad people have been caught lying
so don’t worry, the polar bears will be fine and we will all be ok.

Now I want you to go out and play and stop thinking about this stuff some people at school and
other places have put in your head. Go out and have fun and just remember, don’t tell lies, they
might affect the whole world someday.

End of Story"

[TheEvilDetector]

another one from the same place

"jallen November 26, 2009 at 4:30 pm

Consider – The emails were not a result of a hacker’s activity.
They were also not going to be produced under a FOIA request.

Rather, they are the residual emails comprising those which had already
been *sanitized* from the CRU systems to illegally prepare an incomplete
response for a future (likely successful) FOIA request.
Note that there is a very small percentage of personal chatter that typically
make up close colleagues’ communication. Therefore, it points to a previous
culling.

Theory: These are deleted emails from a sanitized batch which were foolishly
or purposely archived and/or discovered by an insider (perhaps the sanitizer
himself). The insider then had pangs of conscience or an axe to grind and
released them surreptitiously.


Also, data fabrication and algorithm manipulation are not the most important
issues here.

The travesty is that they were peer-reviewing each other’s work! They had
control of their own process. It was a closed-loop system comprised of several
dozen researchers in an incestuous, self-affirming academic relationship.
"