View Full Version : All your E-mails are Belong to us - Time to expose the global warming scam!

11-24-2009, 08:20 AM
YouTube - All Your Emails Are Belong To Us (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SWAytBHG90&feature=player_embedded)


"I've just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline." - Phil Jones, Director Climatic Research Unit (CRU)

"...it would be nice to try to "contain" the putative "MWP", even if we don't yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back." - Michael Mann, Lead Author IPCC (2001)

"I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!" - Phil Jones, Director Climatic Research Unit (CRU)

"I'm getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don't any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom of Information Act!" - Phil Jones, Director Climatic Research Unit (CRU)

"The two MMs have been after the CRU station data for years. If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the UK, I think I'll delete the file rather than send to anyone." - Phil Jones, Director Climatic Research Unit (CRU)

"...If the RMS is going to require authors to make ALL data available - raw data PLUS results from all intermediate calculations - I will not submit any further papers to RMS journals." - Ben Santer, Lead Author IPCC (1995)

"The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't." - Kevin Trenberth, Lead Author IPCC (2001, 2007)

Subject: John L. Daly [Skeptic] Dead

"...this is cheering news!" - Phil Jones, Director Climatic Research Unit (CRU)

"Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I'll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted." - Ben Santer, Lead Author IPCC (1995)

450 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming (http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html)

Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions? (PDF) (http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0809/0809.3762.pdf)(Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Science, MIT)

Is the Sky Really Falling? A Review of Recent Global Warming Scare Stories (PDF) (Patrick J. Michaels, Ph.D. Climatology) (http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa576.pdf)

Is the U.S. Surface Temperature Record Reliable? (PDF) (http://www.heartland.org/books/PDFs/SurfaceStations.pdf)

Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate (PDF) (NIPCC) (http://heartland.temp.siteexecutive.com/pdf/22835.pdf)

11-24-2009, 08:32 AM
I don't know where you got those quotes from, but in the series dealing with the Freedom of informatin act, there is another. One guy tells another to delete all the correspondence he's had with Kieth, and says he will instruct another party to do the same.

This is being done to prevent the emails from being released.

11-24-2009, 09:56 AM
LOL, hillarioius video

11-24-2009, 10:16 AM
If these emails are true, it shows how much of the conspiracy was rooted during the 90s just as the global warming propaganda was about to run full course.

It shows how they were intent on monoplozing the peer review journals with only their limited views, and blacklisting or marginalizing all of those who opposed it.

Once the dissenting views are effectively eliminated, then the whole sham can run on autopilot. Why? It's because any other sociological experiment prove likewise. You can get quite a large segment of the population to believe the moon was made out of cheese, as long as the experts (peer reviewed of course, lol) say so.