PDA

View Full Version : Would this bar Rand from receiving GOP money???




sofia
11-23-2009, 04:25 PM
No room for peace candidates and states rights candidates in the "conservative" GOP?????check out items 6, 7 , and 8 as possible conditions for being denied RNC money in races against Democrats.

miss 3 of the 10 conditions and you might be cut off by the RNC.....

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/11/23/rnc-socialist-resolution-returns/#more-78983

torchbearer
11-23-2009, 04:27 PM
GOP leadership is irrelevant.

Chieftain1776
11-23-2009, 04:43 PM
No room for peace candidates and states rights candidates in the "conservative" GOP?????check out items 6, 7 , and 8 as possible conditions for being denied RNC money in races against Democrats.

miss 3 of the 10 conditions and you might be cut off by the RNC.....

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/11/23/rnc-socialist-resolution-returns/#more-78983

Despite it's name I believe DOMA (#9) is simply upholding a federalist position on marriage i.e. what happens in Vermont stays in Vermont and Rand Paul would support it. Even #7 is vague.

lynnf
11-23-2009, 05:38 PM
No room for peace candidates and states rights candidates in the "conservative" GOP?????check out items 6, 7 , and 8 as possible conditions for being denied RNC money in races against Democrats.

miss 3 of the 10 conditions and you might be cut off by the RNC.....

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/11/23/rnc-socialist-resolution-returns/#more-78983


did I miss something?

I believe it says - miss any of the 10 "planks" and you risk cutoff.....


EDIT: never mind -- saw that it says 3 misses in another story on it!!!!!

lynn

Austrian Econ Disciple
11-23-2009, 06:34 PM
GOP leadership is irrelevant.

This. We don't need, or want their money. This is a grass-roots movement. In fact, it's better we oust them ASAP, and get liberty-minarchists and voluntarysts in prominent positions. People who are philosophers, Statesman, and those who understand economics.

We funded Schiff. We funded Ron. We funded Adam. We funded RJ. We funded Jake T. We will fund one and all liberty candidates and we will win, and if we don't win the elections we will win in the hearts and minds and in another 2 or 4 years we will win. Tyranny has nowhere to hide now. Get out your banners, plant r3VOLution banners, billboards, shirts, everywhere. We should be activists and educators every single day. We are the Sons of Liberty...

Austrian Econ Disciple
11-23-2009, 06:40 PM
Despite it's name I believe DOMA (#9) is simply upholding a federalist position on marriage i.e. what happens in Vermont stays in Vermont and Rand Paul would support it. Even #7 is vague.

Marriage would be a non-issue if it was was expressely and entirely contractual. The State has no business of the issue of marriage. Our marriage message should be just that. Marriage is a private contract between two consenting individuals. It is of no business to the State whatsoever!

LibertyEagle
11-23-2009, 06:58 PM
Registered Republicans might want to email them and let them know the issues you have with the resolution. If you do, it will have more impact if you are professional and take the high road.

I just did and singled out the resolution about Iraq and Afghanistan and let them know why I had a problem with it, how it had nothing to do with our national defense, or traditional conservatism and that I would leave the party if it stayed in.

If enough people would do that, I think they would take notice. It sure couldn't hurt to try.