Uncle Emanuel Watkins
11-23-2009, 10:10 AM
In order to make the economy work for the people, we need to become aware of the stark reality facing us. We can envision this stark reality by considering the very least member amongst us with this person being the worthless, trespassing prostitute who is made to work the streets under the bondage of a pimp. As I've pointed out in a prior post, it is quite easy for us to envision the king as being the representative of tyranny while it is quite difficult for us to envision the lowest amongst us as being the representative of the people.
When the state backs tyranny, the people are at a disadvantage to it as a trespassing prostitute is disadvantaged to her pimp. Although she might demand that it is his business to supply her with the protection of condoms, he can always work it around to making it her business. What is always going against the poor trespassing prostitute is that her existence is illegal.
Likewise, all the business of the people use to be illegal. The reason for this is family. Families by tradition customarily sent their eldest child into the business of the ruling monarchy while the second eldest went into the services of the Church. What did the remaining children do? They went about the illegal business of survival. Why? Well, the ruling monarchy and the Church owned all the property. In order to survive, the trespassing people had to pay a penalty tax.
This is a cruel fact of life. Although slavery has been abolished, we still tolerate it in our midst. We just can't get rid of it. What we can do however is understand how to utilize the economy to work for the enslaved prostitute.
Simply put, when the pimp is required to supply his prostitutes with protection, the price of condoms go down; whereas, when the prostitutes are required to supply their own protection, the price goes up.
This is true of cell phones. When the state backs the request of employers requiring all potential employees to have cell phones, the price goes up. When the state backs the people in requiring businesses to supply their employees with cell phones, if that is their wish, then the price goes down.
Like I said in a prior post, tyranny needs no economy. It is the people who need an established economy because they are the ones who receive an insufficient share of the wealth. The people should own the purse!
When the state backs tyranny, the people are at a disadvantage to it as a trespassing prostitute is disadvantaged to her pimp. Although she might demand that it is his business to supply her with the protection of condoms, he can always work it around to making it her business. What is always going against the poor trespassing prostitute is that her existence is illegal.
Likewise, all the business of the people use to be illegal. The reason for this is family. Families by tradition customarily sent their eldest child into the business of the ruling monarchy while the second eldest went into the services of the Church. What did the remaining children do? They went about the illegal business of survival. Why? Well, the ruling monarchy and the Church owned all the property. In order to survive, the trespassing people had to pay a penalty tax.
This is a cruel fact of life. Although slavery has been abolished, we still tolerate it in our midst. We just can't get rid of it. What we can do however is understand how to utilize the economy to work for the enslaved prostitute.
Simply put, when the pimp is required to supply his prostitutes with protection, the price of condoms go down; whereas, when the prostitutes are required to supply their own protection, the price goes up.
This is true of cell phones. When the state backs the request of employers requiring all potential employees to have cell phones, the price goes up. When the state backs the people in requiring businesses to supply their employees with cell phones, if that is their wish, then the price goes down.
Like I said in a prior post, tyranny needs no economy. It is the people who need an established economy because they are the ones who receive an insufficient share of the wealth. The people should own the purse!