View Full Version : We need to assume that NH will be in mid Dec.
foofighter20x
10-02-2007, 04:47 PM
Get crackin', folks!
Better to be early, in place, and ready than blindsided, late, and surprised! ;)
foofighter20x
10-02-2007, 04:49 PM
I say this since Wyoming has moved up to Jan 5 and NH state law requires their primary to be a week before the earliest state. That'd put their primary between X-mas and New Year's Day, so they'd likely push their primary up further to before the holiday travel season.
noxagol
10-02-2007, 04:54 PM
All of this primary scheduling crap pisses me off.
foofighter20x
10-02-2007, 04:56 PM
I know...
The Delaware Plan would be kicking so much ass right now if it had been adopted. :(
Badger Paul
10-02-2007, 04:58 PM
Not necessarily. State law requires it to be the first primary state in the nation. Iowa has a caucus and Wyoming has county conventions. My guess it will be the Saturday after Iowa, Jan. 12.
I think don't anyone wants a primary in December 2007.
foofighter20x
10-02-2007, 05:02 PM
Not necessarily. State law requires it to be the first primary state in the nation. Iowa has a caucus and Wyoming has county conventions. My guess it will be the Saturday after Iowa, Jan. 12.
I think don't anyone wants a primary in December 2007.
Not according to the Wyoming GOP... (http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RAPI500&show_article=1&catnum=3)
Any selection in the state that binds them to selecting delegates to the convention is de facto a primary, no matter what they call it.
NH is traditionally the first binding primary. Iowa, always a week before NH, has always been non-binding.
paulitics
10-02-2007, 05:46 PM
We need to get cracking anyway before the cold.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.