PDA

View Full Version : Glenn Beck, our founders, and the National Endowment for the Arts




johnwk
10-31-2009, 09:50 PM
Recently, Glenn Beck did a show(s) regarding the Obama administration using the National Endowment for the Arts as a tool for propaganda. Some of Glenn’s inside information came from a tapped conference call arranged by Yosi Sergant. The conference call included at least 16 participants who had received grants from the NEA. Glenn went on to point out the grants were our money and when he first brought it up, there were those who were complaining that Glenn was on “a Hitler hunt” see: Glenn Beck gets another 'scalp' (http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/31112/)


But the truth is, as it turns out, the administration is in fact using the NEA as a tool through which taxpayer money is carefully channeled to fund a propaganda machine, and Glenn Beck has documented this!


Now, the question is, did our founding fathers have anything to say about the newly created federal government having power to tax for and spend on the production or creation of art? Hopefully Glenn’s crack research team will have time to do a little research into our founding father’s views on the subject, for example, on February 7th 1792 Representative John Page speaking before the House of Representatives addresses the issue as follows:


"The framers of the Constitution guarded so much against a possibility of such partial preferences as might be given, if Congress had the right to grant them, that, even to encourage learning and useful arts, the granting of patents is the extent of their power. And surely nothing could be less dangerous to the sovereignty or interest of the individual States than the encouragement which might be given to ingenious inventors or promoters of valuable inventions in the arts and sciences. The encouragement which the General Government might give to the fine arts, to commerce, to manufactures, and agriculture, might, if judiciously applied, redound to the honor of Congress, and the splendor, magnificence, and real advantage of the United States; but the wise framers of our Constitution saw that, if Congress had the power of exerting what has been called a royal munificence for these purposes, Congress might, like many royal benefactors, misplace their munificence; might elevate sycophants, and be inattentive to men unfriendly to the views of Government; might reward the ingenuity of the citizens of one State, and neglect a much greater genius of another. A citizen of a powerful State it might be said, was attended to, whilst that of one of less weight in the Federal scale was totally neglected. It is not sufficient, to remove these objections, to say, as some gentlemen have said, that Congress in incapable of partiality or absurdities, and that they are as far from committing them as my colleagues or myself. I tell them the Constitution was formed on a supposition of human frailty, and to restrain abuses of mistaken powers.” Annals of Congress Feb 7th,1792 Rep Page (http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llac&fileName=003/llac003.db&recNum=194)


Wow! That seems to be exactly what the present administration is doing, and doing so in violation of our written Constitution because Congress has not been granted power to tax for and fund the production of art!

It should also be noted that a few days before Rep. Page’s speech, Rep. Giles gives the following speech and focuses on a primary function of government.


"Under a just and equal Government, every individual is entitled to protection in the enjoyment of the whole product of his labor, except such portion of it as is necessary to enable Government to protect the rest; this is given only in consideration of the protection offered. In every bounty, exclusive right, or monopoly, Government violates the stipulation on her part; for, by such a regulation, the product of one man's labor is transferred to the use and enjoyment of another. The exercise of such a right on the part of Government can be justified on no other principle, than that the whole product of the labor or every individual is the real property of Government, and may be distributed among the several parts of the community by government discretion; such a supposition would directly involve the idea, that every individual in the community is merely a slave and bondsman to Government, who, although he may labor, is not to expect protection in the product of his labor. An authority given to any Government to exercise such a principle, would lead to a complete system of tyranny." ___ Rep. Giles, speaking before Congress February 3rd, 1792 (http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llac&fileName=003/llac003.db&recNum=179)

And so, Obama’s use of the federal government’s powers to redistribute the wealth is not only a system of tyranny, but Obama’s techniques are attempting to complete such tyranny by using the force of government as a tool for propaganda and to drown out any opposition to his tyranny!


JWK


America, we have a problem, we have been attacked from within! We are being destroyed from within by a group of domestic enemies who have managed to seize political power and whose mission is in fact to bring “change” to America ___ the dismantling of our military defensive power; the allowance of our borders to be overrun by foreign invaders, the diluting of our election process by allowing ineligible persons to vote; the destruction of our manufacturing capabilities; the strangulation of our agricultural industry and ability to produce food under the guise of environmental necessity; the looting of both our federal treasury and a mandatory retirement pension fund; the brainwashing of our nation’s children in government operated schools; the creation of an iron fisted control unauthorized by our written Constitution over America’s businesses and industries; the devaluation of our nation’s currency, and, the future enslavement of our children and grand children via unbridled debt and inflation, not to mention an iron fisted government which intends to rule their very lives!

johnwk
11-01-2009, 03:47 PM
Wow. No interest in the Obama administration using the NEA as their personal propaganda machine? Let us consider the following.

The irrefutable fact is, Congress is not authorized under the Constitution to tax for and spend federal revenue to promote the production of art. And more importantly, for Obama’s ringleaders at the NEA to appropriate federal revenue in the form of grants so their recipients will advance the personal interests of the Obama administration, as Obama’s administration has been caught doing and is on tape conspiring in such an act, is not only a misappropriation of federal revenue but a criminal offense under statutory law!

Aside from the criminal aspects mentioned above it may come as a surprise to some, but funding the arts using federal revenue violates the protection guaranteed to taxpayers under the First Amendment! Let me explain.

In 1998, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled in the case National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley that NEA grants are constitutional if content does not offended "...general standards of decency..." But the Court not only ignored the absence of a power granted to Congress by our Constitution to fund the promotion of art, it likewise ignored the carefully limited wording in our Constitution granting power to Congress To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts and how shall this be done? by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries Now how could Justice texualist SCALIA, who claims the words of the Constitution must be followed, managed to have joined in part in the ruling in the case?


So, how does federal funding of the arts violate a taxpayer’s guarantee that Congress shall make no law …abridging the freedom of speech ? Federal funding does so by allowing A, who has received federal grant money taxed away from B, to vocalize and express their opinions and feelings in a more forceful manner than B, while B’s financial resources, which may have been used by B to finance his or her own expressions and feelings are reduced by the hand of the federal government in its quest to fund A. In clear and simple language, federal funding of the arts provides a select group with a powerful megaphone to express their opinions and feelings, while such funding is forcefully taken from those who may object to the expressions and opinions spewed out over the federally funded megaphone.

And this brings us back to the danger of allowing the federal government to engage in such funding as stated by Representative John Page:

"The framers of the Constitution guarded so much against a possibility of such partial preferences as might be given, if Congress had the right to grant them, that, even to encourage learning and useful arts, the granting of patents is the extent of their power. … the wise framers of our Constitution saw that, if Congress had the power of exerting what has been called a royal munificence for these purposes, Congress might, like many royal benefactors, misplace their munificence; might elevate sycophants, and be inattentive to men unfriendly to the views of Government …Annals of Congress Feb 7th,1792 Rep Page (http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llac&fileName=003/llac003.db&recNum=194)

Glenn Beck needs to follow up on this issue, especially its criminal aspects as I outlined above.

JWK


As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances there is a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air - however slight - lest we become unwitting victims of darkness.___Supreme Court Justice William Douglas

purplechoe
11-01-2009, 06:40 PM
No interest in Glenn Beck. May that controlled opposition rot in hell!!!

heavenlyboy34
11-01-2009, 06:46 PM
As an artist myself, I am sad that so many artists sell out to the State. :(

tonesforjonesbones
11-01-2009, 07:03 PM
Glenn Beck was talking about voting for "the lesser of two evils". He is the only talking head I have heard reference that. tones

Liberty Star
11-01-2009, 07:33 PM
No interest in Glenn Beck. May that controlled opposition rot in hell!!!

He's been dumped on from all sides lately, was that really necessary LOL